A survey by NGO Common Cause and Lokniti shows Adivasis are most afraid of being framed for Maoist activities, while Dalits are afraid of being falsely accused of petty thefts.
The Congress president faces trial in a defamation case filed against him by a RSS worker over his comments accusing the Sangh of killing Mahatma Gandhi.
According to data released by the registrar general of India, Kerala registered the lowest maternal mortality ratio in 2014-16, at 46, emerging as one of the few states with a double-digit figure.
The Devendra Fadnavis government planned to build 6.64 lakh houses under the PMAY scheme but only 86,320 are complete or under construction; government hopes to clear backlog through PPP model scheme.
Punjab & Haryana HC judge Ajay Kumar Mittal wrote to the Union law minister on 30 May saying some of the names don’t merit appointment as high court judges.
BJP’s fate in the second phase of 2024 Lok Sabha election will be decided in Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Maharashtra, where it performed very well in 2019 but faces a stiff competition now.
The private lender's shares tumbled to be top Nifty 50 loser after India's central bank barred it from taking on new customers through online and mobile banking channels.
Another addition to military cooperation has been the Strategic Space Dialogue, inaugurated in Paris in 2023. Last month, India participated as an observer to France’s AsterX.
Vibudha LK. Correct, so what should be the minimum sample size for such deduction? Coming from a research background, for prevalence estimation, a’g to any widely understood formula for sample size calculation like 4pq/lsquare, the sample size seems more than enough.
I don’t know whether you have a science background or not but if you are demanding a sample bigger than this then you should also stop believing in clinical trials and modern medicine. All of them are conducted in a far lesser population than this, because the criteria should be at least minimum sample size not any magic number that one considers important by virtue of experience etc.
I am sorry I am not using my real name because I don’t want to be abused and trolled, I am too old for that. Probably you wouldn’t, but many do. Please ask for clarification if you want to know further about the same.
I’m sorry if you were trolled or abused. Everyone experience that at one or the other point in their life including me. And, you make a good point. But the thing is, a research in Chemistry or Medicine is a totally diff ball game. A person in UK or US can be tested for medicinal purpose and the same medicine can be use in other parts of the world. But thats not the same thing here right. What I feel is not the same as what you feel. Two people coming from the same background, with the same education and bringing up, will feel differently about different topics. Hence, you can’t, and I stress it, you simply cannot put up a headline saying 1 in 2 Indian Muslims, jus because you claim that you have interviewed some 0.001% of the population. Because each individual has a different feeling. You cannot generalise it. All you achieve in doing so is creating fear and incepting your own opinions in people’s mind. Which is so wrong on so many levels. Hope you get my point.
I hope they dont cancel my reply
The population of India is 135.4 crores aprox.
You claim to do a study among merely 15,000 respondants. That is approx 0.001% of the total population. And u put up a headline stating 1 in 2 muslim feels something. I mean, how desperate are you? You should be ashamed of your articles.
I hope they dont cancel my reply
Vibudha LK. Correct, so what should be the minimum sample size for such deduction? Coming from a research background, for prevalence estimation, a’g to any widely understood formula for sample size calculation like 4pq/lsquare, the sample size seems more than enough.
I don’t know whether you have a science background or not but if you are demanding a sample bigger than this then you should also stop believing in clinical trials and modern medicine. All of them are conducted in a far lesser population than this, because the criteria should be at least minimum sample size not any magic number that one considers important by virtue of experience etc.
I am sorry I am not using my real name because I don’t want to be abused and trolled, I am too old for that. Probably you wouldn’t, but many do. Please ask for clarification if you want to know further about the same.
I’m sorry if you were trolled or abused. Everyone experience that at one or the other point in their life including me. And, you make a good point. But the thing is, a research in Chemistry or Medicine is a totally diff ball game. A person in UK or US can be tested for medicinal purpose and the same medicine can be use in other parts of the world. But thats not the same thing here right. What I feel is not the same as what you feel. Two people coming from the same background, with the same education and bringing up, will feel differently about different topics. Hence, you can’t, and I stress it, you simply cannot put up a headline saying 1 in 2 Indian Muslims, jus because you claim that you have interviewed some 0.001% of the population. Because each individual has a different feeling. You cannot generalise it. All you achieve in doing so is creating fear and incepting your own opinions in people’s mind. Which is so wrong on so many levels. Hope you get my point.
I hope they dont cancel my reply
The population of India is 135.4 crores aprox.
You claim to do a study among merely 15,000 respondants. That is approx 0.001% of the total population. And u put up a headline stating 1 in 2 muslim feels something. I mean, how desperate are you? You should be ashamed of your articles.