Maneesh Chhibber was Editor (Investigations & Special Projects) at ThePrint. He is one of India’s top legal, politics and government reporters who has worked at The Tribune, Hindustan Times, The Indian Express and DNA.
Why free speech no longer convinient.All the while journalist were lecturing free speech ,freedom and all nonsense.So much for liberal democracy.What about the safety valve argument of mah lord.It was never about freedom of speech ,governace .Now that this instruments are left useless you feel powerless so now there to protect free speech the journalist is supporting authoritism.Bloody hypocrites.Its always about religion and power.
Should newspaper and online media outlets not be held to account also in that case. You cannot cry freedom of speech when the media outlets peddle the narrative of one party or another. In fact, journalists brazenly shill for political parties, post fake news, and spread blatant falsehoods from their privileged positions. How come they are completely free to do this but intermediaries are supposed to have responsibilities on social media networks?
If anything, content on media outlets is carefully curated to present falsehoods, ignore inconvenient news, and thus should be held far more liable. You cannot demand freedom of the press to push the agenda of a few elite but then turn around and demand controls on the general population and their enablers for their views.
They are biggest frauds at least politicians can be changed by elections this people are totally unaccountable but wield so much influence and power in society.Journalist and bureaucrats are real power centre’s who are the only constants in system.Effective mechanism should be set up to hold them accountable to people.
What if the one vitiating the environment and dividing the society is from the government?? Do you expect them to create a law that will stop them from doing their communal politics??
We recall and remember the divisive and hate spreading agenda of the Main Stream Media, in the selection and reportage of communally sensitive incidents since Independence, blaming the majority community for everything. Unfortunately this is continuing even now. Then came the saviour in the form of social media, to exchange the correct news and views. There will be a few cases of misuse, but not to the extent and scale of the Main Stream Media, which has been coopted by the radical left and other Muslim appeasing governments. The spread of social media is so pervasive, that no one believes MSM anymore. This will continue till they redeem themselves, by accepting the errors of their way.
Lol… You’re a next level gobarbhakt!!!
Social media memes cannot replace facts and reality. But your infamous IT cell is always working overtime to control the social media narrative.
FACTS and REALITies are now manufactured in the labs of LIBRANDUS. Better you get tuned to the emerging time where fakeness is part of life.
This will be used as a pretext bybMSM to target social media as social media has ruthlessly exposed them for their doubles peak.
Why free speech no longer convinient.All the while journalist were lecturing free speech ,freedom and all nonsense.So much for liberal democracy.What about the safety valve argument of mah lord.It was never about freedom of speech ,governace .Now that this instruments are left useless you feel powerless so now there to protect free speech the journalist is supporting authoritism.Bloody hypocrites.Its always about religion and power.
Parents of hate agenda’s are LIBRANDUS. Just shut their mouth and dump them into gutters.
Where is the dislike icon?
Should newspaper and online media outlets not be held to account also in that case. You cannot cry freedom of speech when the media outlets peddle the narrative of one party or another. In fact, journalists brazenly shill for political parties, post fake news, and spread blatant falsehoods from their privileged positions. How come they are completely free to do this but intermediaries are supposed to have responsibilities on social media networks?
If anything, content on media outlets is carefully curated to present falsehoods, ignore inconvenient news, and thus should be held far more liable. You cannot demand freedom of the press to push the agenda of a few elite but then turn around and demand controls on the general population and their enablers for their views.
They are biggest frauds at least politicians can be changed by elections this people are totally unaccountable but wield so much influence and power in society.Journalist and bureaucrats are real power centre’s who are the only constants in system.Effective mechanism should be set up to hold them accountable to people.
What if the one vitiating the environment and dividing the society is from the government?? Do you expect them to create a law that will stop them from doing their communal politics??
We recall and remember the divisive and hate spreading agenda of the Main Stream Media, in the selection and reportage of communally sensitive incidents since Independence, blaming the majority community for everything. Unfortunately this is continuing even now. Then came the saviour in the form of social media, to exchange the correct news and views. There will be a few cases of misuse, but not to the extent and scale of the Main Stream Media, which has been coopted by the radical left and other Muslim appeasing governments. The spread of social media is so pervasive, that no one believes MSM anymore. This will continue till they redeem themselves, by accepting the errors of their way.
Lol… You’re a next level gobarbhakt!!!
Social media memes cannot replace facts and reality. But your infamous IT cell is always working overtime to control the social media narrative.
FACTS and REALITies are now manufactured in the labs of LIBRANDUS. Better you get tuned to the emerging time where fakeness is part of life.