Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
The Trump administration’s recent attempt to revoke Harvard University’s ability to admit International students at first glance might come across just as a policy dispute. But looking closer it is an assault on academic freedom, pluralism, immigrant dignity and the idea of open society. This step has been blocked as of now by a federal judge has marked a dangerous escalation in the immigration policy by the government as a political weapon.
Homeland Security has made vague accusations that Harvard has collaborated with the Chinese Communist Party and is fostering anti-semitism, which are not only inflammatory but rather unsubstantiated which are meant to increase silence, fear, dissent and send a firm message to the academic institutions of either abiding to their ideology or be punished instead. For the international students, it’s a crisis for existence rather than a political skirmish.
Boulevard of Deferred Dreams
Harvard has always represented something which is precious and rare, giving the possibility to its students to become their fullest selves and promised access to not just resources, networking but also to ideas and freedom. The academic freedom to learn, to speak, to challenge, to question. Many people left behind their home countries where opportunity is scarce, where governments are oppressive or where academic inquiry is tightly controlled. Harvard, and by extension the United States represented something precious a future built on merit, curiosity, and courage.
But now, the students find themselves caught in a battle that should never have included them. On Thursday, the Trump administration escalated its ongoing standoff with Harvard by revoking the university’s certification to host international students-a move that could force over a quarter of the student body to leave or be denied re-entry. Thousands of scholars, researchers, future physicians, engineers, and teachers stand to lose the very thing they crossed oceans for. This is not about national security. It is not about antisemitism, China, or curriculum integrity-despite what the department of Homeland Security has claimed. This is about power. It is about an administration flexing its muscle to punish a university that refused to bend to political demands and the students have become collateral damage.
Attack on Diversity
The administration’s cruelty towards immigrants is well- documented. But this latest act crosses another line. It uses the immigration status of students who already faced detention for speaking up. The students are very well aware of how easily a system can be weaponized. How a protest, a tweet, or even an academic paper can become grounds for surveillance or arrest. There is a deep irony in all this. The students came here because they believed in America and in its founding values, in its bold, sometimes messy, always vital commitment to freedom of speech and thought. The students believed in its universities which have been long sanctuaries for ideas that challenge the world and change it. But the message the students are getting now is clear that if one speaks up they’ll risk their education. Question authority and one may end up losing their visa, disagree too loudly and one may find themselves on a plane or worse in a detention facility. The students cannot afford to be silent and neither can Harvard.
The Trump administration’s move is not just an attack on international students. It is an attack on Harvard’s identity. The university’s strength lies in its global diversity, in its ability to bring together the most brilliant minds from around the world to work, argue, and learn together. Take away that diversity, and Harvard becomes smaller. Narrower, less innovative, less courageous. President Alan Garber was right when he said the judge’s restraining order was “a critical step to protect the rights and opportunities of our international students and scholars, who are vital to the University’s mission and community.” But Harvard must go further. It must fight this battle not just in courtrooms, but in the court of public opinion. It must stand not only for its own autonomy, but for the values that define a truly great institution: openness, inclusion, and fearless inquiry. This is not a moment for cautious diplomacy. It is a moment for moral clarity.
Because the truth is, what happens to Harvard today will happen to other universities tomorrow. If the government can strip Harvard of its certification because it doesn’t like its hiring practices or academic tone, what stops it from doing the same to the other Ivy League colleges. This is not about one elite university. It is about the future of education in America. International students are not a threat but actually an asset, they pay full tuition often without federal aid. They support over 368,000 jobs and contribute more than $40 billion annually to the U.S. economy. More importantly, they enrich the cultural and intellectual fabric of every campus we inhabit. They bring with themselves the stories shaped by war, climate crisis, dictatorship, and economic hardship. They bring determination, humility, and hope and they bring the kind of fierce love for democracy that comes from having lived without it.
How Harvard should stand up for its Integrity
The student presence here is not a gift; it’s an exchange. They give, build, innovate and in return, they ask only for the right to learn freely, live safely, and be treated with dignity. But this administration sees things differently. It sees international students as a bargaining chip, a liability, or worse, a threat. It accuses Harvard of “fostering violence” and “coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party,” with no evidence but only political posturing. It has already frozen $2.2 billion in grants and contracts to the university in a thinly veiled attempt to force ideological compliance. This is not governance but rather blackmail and if it’ll be left unchecked it can create a future where colleges would be under scrutiny and would be penalized for refusing to not align with a certain political ideology and visas would be revoked on the basis of ideology and scholarships would be under surveillance.
Not only Harvard the stakes are gigantic for international students all across the US and the soul of diversity amongst universities in America is on the borderline. If a political party dictates who can be enrolled, who can be allowed on campus and what can be taught, then the universities lose the very essence of what makes American education unique and the legacy it carries around the world and Harvard must continue to challenge this judgement not only in court but also through its policies and American citizens shall too understand that not only education is at stake, but also the country’s vision and its ideologies are too stake and what America has stood for all these years.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.