Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
In the bustling city of Pune, where the cacophony of traffic and the aroma of street food blend seamlessly, a seemingly innocuous bus ride becomes a microcosm of larger societal questions. The AC bus ticket prices, tailored for senior citizens, raise eyebrows and provoke contemplation. Let us dissect this issue and explore potential solutions.
The Jet-Setting Senior Citizen: Our first traveler, a sprightly septuagenarian, embarks on a journey from Mumbai to Pune. His life story reads like a novel: two children settled in the United States, dual homes in Pune and Mumbai, and a biannual sojourn to the land of the free. But wait, he gets a subsidy for his bus fare? The irony is palpable. The US government, unyielding in its visa fees, doesn’t extend the same courtesy to elderly citizens in VISA fees. Is this subsidy a mere formality, a token gesture? Perhaps. But it raises questions about equity and allocation of resources.
The Entrepreneurial Spirit: Our second traveler, a budding industrialist, shuttles between Pune and Jogeshwari. His factory dreams are taking shape, and he’s a man on a mission. The half-priced ticket barely registers on his radar. Does he care? The subsidy, a mere blip in his financial landscape, doesn’t sway his entrepreneurial zeal. But herein lies the paradox: those who need it least benefit the most.
The Educated Duo: Our third duo, a well-educated couple, boards the bus with their cherubic 6-year-old son. The husband and son pay full fare, while the wife enjoys a discount. Their appearance exudes affluence, and their education levels suggest financial stability. Do they truly need this subsidy? The answer is elusive. Beneath the surface, societal norms and expectations play a role. The wife, conditioned by tradition, accepts the concession. But is it fair?
Bigger Picture:
Subsidies, like raindrops on a parched land, should nourish the needy. Yet, they often cascade onto the well-heeled. The government’s intent—to provide for all—sometimes backfires. The lady earning 20 lakhs annually, on the Shivneri AC bus, sipping her coffee at Starbucks epitomizes this paradox. She doesn’t need the subsidy, but it’s hers for the taking. Extend this to railways, and we enter a labyrinth of caste and religion-based allocations. The question lingers: Why do people embrace handouts with open arms?
Innovative Solutions:
Direct Cash Transfers: Instead of convoluted subsidies, deposit a modest sum annually into citizens’ bank accounts. Let them decide how to allocate it. A thousand rupees may not change lives, but it empowers choice.
Healthcare Top-Ups: Augment existing medical insurance policies. Imagine a family with a 10-lakh mediclaim policy receiving an automatic top-up of 20 lakhs. It’s a win-win: financial security for families and reduced strain on public healthcare.
Shift the Foucs: Shift the focus from gender-based subsidies to universal access.
Conclusion: Subsidies, like spices in a curry, must be judiciously sprinkled. Let’s recalibrate our approach. Prioritize the truly needy, empower the self-sufficient, and ensure that every rupee spent serves a purpose.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint