scorecardresearch
Thursday, May 16, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeTechAI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case

AI cannot be patent ‘inventor’, UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case

Follow Us :
Text Size:

LONDON (Reuters) – An American computer scientist on Wednesday lost his bid to register patents over inventions created by his artificial intelligence system, in a landmark case in Britain about whether AI can own patent rights.

Stephen Thaler wanted to be granted two patents in the UK over inventions he says were devised by his “creativity machine” called DABUS.

His attempt to register the patents was refused by Britain’s Intellectual Property Office on the grounds that the inventor must be a human or a company, rather than a machine.

Thaler appealed to the UK’s Supreme Court, which on Wednesday unanimously rejected his appeal.

Judge David Kitchin, announcing the court’s ruling, said that under UK patent law “an inventor must be a natural person”.

Thaler earlier this year lost a similar bid in the United States, when the Supreme Court there declined to hear a challenge to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s refusal to issue patents for inventions created by his AI system.

(Reporting by Sam Tobin, Editing by Kylie MacLellan)

Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibilty for its content.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

  • Tags

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular