West Bengal is an Indian state in the eastern part of the country, and the only one in India with an incumbent woman Chief Minister — Mamata Banerjee.
The region, which was the political heart of the Bengal Presidency during British Rule, was divided into East and West Bengal in 1947. Bengal was a hotbed of the Indian Independence movement and has remained one of the country’s great artistic and intellectual centres, being home to Nobel laureates Rabindranath Tagore, Mother Teresa, Amartya Sen and Abhijit Banerjee as well as freedom fighter Subhash Chandra Bose and Oscar winner Satyajit Ray.
Geographically, the state is happily situated with the Himalayas in the north and the Sundarbans in the south. It shares a roughly 2,200-sqkm border with Bangladesh (East Bengal at the time of Partition).
For the first 30 years, the Congress ruled Bengal, but made way for Left domination for the next 34 years. In 2011, Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress — a breakaway from the Congress — came to power.
all investigations by police forces of any kind including cbi are to be conducted under the code of criminal procedure.
the code has detailed provisions for each act to be undertaken by an investigating officer.
when police from one jurisdiction wish to do anything in another jurisdiction, they are bound to fallow the provisions of the code of criminal procedure.
this is what section 160 says
160. Police officer’ s power to require attendance of witnesses.
(1) Any police officer, making an investigation under this Chapter may, by order in writing, require the attendance before himself of any person being within the limits of his own or any adjoining station who, from the information given or otherwise, appears to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case; and such person shall attend as so required: Provided that no male person under the age of fifteen years or woman shall be required to attend at any place other than the place in which such male person or woman resides.
(2) The State Government may, by rules made in this behalf, provide for the payment by the police officer of the reasonable expenses of every person, attending under sub- section (1) at any place other than his residence.
but admittedly the present commissioner of police kolkata is not and can not be a witness for cbi.
he too is a police officer who was in charge of the SIT, or special investigation team that was formed to investigate certain offences. the subject matter of such investigations was handed over by the supreme court to cbi. cbi has collected the case records from the earlier investigation team.
if cbi has any issue with what material was given to it, it has to fallow the procedure laid down for collection or records by a new team of investigation from the old team.
the state government normally makes such detailed rules. so cbi should have raised the issue with the state government, which it appears to have done. if the cbi was not satisfied with their response, they ought to have brought the matter to the notice of the supreme court from whose order it has drawn the mandate to investigate this case as an investigating team or investigation officer as prescribed under the code of criminal procedure.
it has not done so.
whenever any visiting police team wants to do anything, specially making a raid on the residence of another police officer, they must consult the local police.
in this case it was the very officer who had the power to authorize the visiting police team to do what they want to do. as such they could not have asked his permission. so they ought to have worked out an arrangement with the director general of the police, west Bengal for a solution. they could have given this officer every question they want to ask him and he would have given his answers in writing. and if his answers were not satisfactory, they could have called him as a witness and he could have been examined under oath in a court when the case came up for trail.. the cbi bigwigs have clearly stated that they wanted to arrest him. how can they arrest a police officer who has investigated the matter they are now investigating under a court order?
they would have no power.
we do not seem to have access to the affidavit of the cbi in supreme court. press reports say that they claim that he has destroyed evidence.
there is no power vested in any police officer, or court or authority of any kind in India to begin an investigation or arrest any person without first registering an FIR, a first information report in a police station or cbi which is equivalent to a police station. the FIR must be dispatched to the concerned magistrate expeditiously!
in the instant case the matter seem to be almost five years or so old. cbi appears to have taken over the case in 2014 or so under the orders of the supreme court.
the charge of destruction of evidence is a new offence.
supreme court appears to have directed the cbi to investigate the sarada scam.
allegations of destruction of evidence in the earlier sarada scam forms a distinct offence.
for that, in all probability, the cbi must lodge an fir with the local police against the police officer they find have or might have destroyed evidence.. they have to furnish the material and information they have for this allegation to the local police station station house officer and any investigating officer assigned by him to investigate the same.
if the police do not investigate or do not investigate to the satisfaction of the cbi, they can move the concerned magistrate or they can place the matter before the supreme court and seek their guidance.
recently cbi director and additional directors appear to have registered such firs against each other in different sections of cbi.
forty cbi officers raiding the house of a quasi judicial officer, an officer who is vested with magisterial powers is a clear violation of the code of criminal procedure. cbi does not have such power.
mr rajeev kumar has requested the cbi to give him a list of questions for which he would send answers.
he appears to be within his rights.
his answers would have been in black and white and available for Judaical scrutiny.
if the cbi has insisted that he come to Delhi, a clear nefarious design is patent.
cbi has an office in kolkata. if they wish to speak to a senior ips officer, they must go to his office. and if that officer insists the questions be in writing for whatever reason, he must be obliged.
i think it is part of right to life for any person to request any authority to put all their questions in writing and to furnish all answers in writing, assuming the asking authority has the right to ask, so that no dispute can arise as to what was asked and what was answered, and if what was asked was something that can be asked under law and what was answered was in conformity with the legal liability to answer! the supreme court seem to have missed in finding out under which provision of law and what questions the cbi wanted to ask mr rajeev kumar. the cbi ought have been able to place the questions before the supreme court and the provision of code of criminal procedure under which it wanted to ask those questions.it would have been a simple matter for the supreme court to examine if the provision and questions were lawful, and ask mr kumar to answer them.
police in general and cbi and other special police forces have been generally not fallowing the lawful procedure prescribed under the code of criminal procedure. that it self is a serious offence. but most victims do not have the where whittle to question and make police answerable.
cbi appears to have been taking advantage of a not so learned order of the supreme court in directing them to investigate this matter.
there appears to be a serious mistake on the part of supreme court to refer all and sundry matters to CBI or NSA disregarding the code of criminal procedure and the constitutional mandate of law and order and crimes being a state subject in the constitution of India.
cbi is not vested with power to investigate matters in states unless the states have given a mandate.
ruling parties in India have been blatantly misusing cbi to cow down their political opponents or save criminals belonging to the ruling party. supreme court of india has acknowledged the mischief for which cbi has been put to by different union governments over time.
criminal procedure code is a law that governs all investigations in india.
there is a provision for every situation.
supreme court must respect that.
supreme court must respect the basic structure of constitution concerning the separation of powers and the Federal structure provided by the constitution.
if there is a grievance for anyone against any investigation officer, they have a right to move the concerned magistrate who is having superintending powers under the code of criminal procedure. he can provide for alternate investigations by another officer or a superior officer as per the code. and if he believes the police officers are incapable of doing their job, or are under political pressure from the state government or higher police officers, then the magistrate can appoint any person as an investigation officer.
there is obviously no FIR about destruction of evidence in sarada scam by the earlier investigation team. any member of the earlier investigation team can not have any knowledge of sarada scam unless they were a participant in the original scam. any investigation officer can not therefore be called as a witness into sarada scam. if cbi has information or reason to believe, must reduce the alleged information into an FIR and send it to concerned magistrate and investigate the same under his supervision as is done into any cognizable offence.
while that be the situation, the supreme court which is impossibly and unjustly burdened with too many cases appears to be loosing track of the law of the land and some how becoming a party to bringing in a partisan CBI into investigating offences alleged against the political adversaries of the party that is in power in union government and has all the power, motive, reason and even a necessity to misuse the machinery and powers of cbi against political adversaries.
the cbi officers are stated to have given answer as a secrete operation behind their raid.
the code of criminal procedure does not provide for or vest any authority in cbi or any police officer to conduct any operation that is secrete, and so secrete that it can not be disclosed to local police.
any search operation requires necessary documentation as provided in the code of criminal procedure.
the affidavit filed before supreme court to the extent reported does not appear to be satisfying any of the conditions mentioned in the code of criminal procedure. it is rather puzzling why the Honorable supreme court of india did not scrutinize this fiasco from the lens of of the code of criminal procedure.
as the highest court in the land supreme court is vested with special powers. but generally it has been an established principle of the supreme court and various high courts to insist on fallowing the general law and procedure before any special and extraordinary jurisdiction is invoked. what prevented the supreme court from ensuring compliance of every aspect of the code of criminal procedure relevant to the circumstances of this case needs to be made public by legal luminaries present in the curt or by the supreme court itself. otherwise there will be serious erosion of faith in the supreme court and it’s application and exercise of the extraordinary power vested with it under constitution for special situations.
i have another major serious worry concerning the unity and integrity of India.
the union government has been misusing its armed forces and investigative and tax authorities to fix it’s political adversaries or to enlist legislators from adverse political parties to defect to it’s side or to make to neutralize them. union government and certain elements in kerala high court have been causing serious problems to kerala government which has been trying to give effect to the judgment of supreme court about entry of women into sabarimala temple.
in Kashmir it has dismissed the state assembly.
in north east it has been playing with fire destabilizing lawfully established elected governments.
now it has brought in the citizenship act amendment bill passed in loksabha.
north east states are seriously worried.
it has been refusing special status promised in loksabha to new state of andhra pradesh
west Bengal is a very key state geographically. it is the only connection between the north east of india and mainland India.
erstwhile mighty USSR got broken down and a score or so of new countries have come into existence. they have all been more or less in some or other turmoil.
the horn of Africa has been experiencing serious trouble.
central Europe and parts of eastern Europe have got broken down into a few new countries.
there has been a western powers and USA engineered coup in Ukraine against the elected government.
trump appears to be bent upon invading Venezuela and tightening noose around Cuba. all this amidst development of superior high speed un matched missiles by Russia and china.
there appears to be serious forces and trends of destabilization all around.
the NDA government which in practice is modi shaw government has been playing with every kind of fire in different parts of India trying to usurp power that is not vested in it under the constitution. they appear to be openly subverting the constitution and it’s institutions without any remorse.
i am seriously worried if this will provoke different peoples of India like the Bengal, tamilnadu and andhra and north east to examine their being part of the union of India.
if elected governments are to be sabotaged like they are being now sabotaged, their options may shrink and forces of separation may rise their ugly head.
is modi-shaw duo that foolish?
they appear to be on a path of provocation of a very high degree to destabilize and to de-legitimize elected governments.
i am seriously afraid about the consequences of their irresponsible actions.
i wonder if others too see what see coming!
I doubt if this raid was ordered by the interim Director of CBI. It had the hallmark of Mr Modi himself — sensational! Like DeMo announcement, GST celebration at midnight of announcement. If Amit Shah too was threatening to have the CP arrested as mentioned in this article, then he too might have nudged the PM to nudge Nageshwar Rao to act in this manner. Or who knows, he might have HIMSELF ordered Nageshwar Rao! Bizarre things have been happening in this country anyway. I have never seen the leader of a political party, who holds no government office, show the chutzpah of threatening a commissioner of police with arrest!
The outgoing – interim – Director could have enjoyed his well deserved Sunday siesta, allowed the regular Director, whose appointment had been announced, to apply his mind to what appears to have been an old case, one amongst thousands, and decide the appropriate course of action.