The Congress MP was responding to a question about his recent remark that no good Hindu would want a temple at the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site.
Until now, units operating even in recognised industrial areas needed a separate factory licence. The move is expected to especially give a boost to small and medium enterprises.
As Narendra Modi becomes India’s second-longest consecutively serving Prime Minister, we look at how he compares with Indira Gandhi across four key dimensions.
Bang on, Advani was the architect and executor of that demolition and author is absolutely right that if he really had a moment of repentance then he would have worked towards an out of court settlement. But probably he was too starry eyed of the possibility of his priministership that even if he had an iota of repentance it was drowned in his ambition.
SHASHI THAROOR and his supporters should also read Inside exclusive details in OUTLOOK HIND issues ( around 2006-2008 ) when we published all facts , records including video records of Advani and Vajpayee speech in Lucknow before demolishing disputed structure ( as claimed by them — AREA KO SAMATAL KARNA HAI . Also don’t forget who was Home Ministert and Deputy Prime Minister during 2002 of Gujarat riots and also guiding STATE GOVERNMENT
Majority of Indians attach their identity to the Sanatan Dharma which is called Hindu Dharma also. From time immemorial India had varied culture but religious identity and faith was one. Ramayana, Mahabharata and Vedas depicts one faith. When invaders succeeded to conquer Indian territory, the first thing they did was to destroy our symbols of faith, cultural identity and intelligentsia. They imposed their religion through force and violence and made us slave. When British left and freed the country, Islamic leaders said they can not coexist with non Islamic population and that Islam is different Nationality. Few Indian majority leaders still governed by Non violence and secularism agreed to divide the Nation based on Islamic Population. Even after division a large chunk of Islamic population retained in India. Then onward secularism became synonymous to Muslim appeasement.
A self respecting citizen with pride when reads the history to know how our places of worship were desecrated by barbaric invaders and demolished. Lacs of population butchered and intimidated, natural outcome is anguish.
We are now in free India we are reminded of this fact by such structures like Babari Masjid remains and failure to reconstruct Ram Mandir, every one feels bad. One party which governed this country for so long taught us secularism means suppressing majority feeling for appeasement of others.
Our so called intellectuals should work to convince every citizen that injustice even done in past must be corrected through consensus so as to restore prestige of majority population of land and not to give chance to politicians to take undue advantage.
Courts and constitution are made by People and are subject to review and corrections. Judiciary is also made of people which may at times reflect their own views. A balance approach is required where every one of us detach ourselves from history which brings us in Low light and reminds us of bleak past. New identity will be common Indian identity, cultural nationalism is not a wrong word.
One wonders if Tharoor has NOW taken to saying things that will directly attract the attention of Rahul and others who matter; much in the manner of Divya Spandana aka Ramya, and some others, who also come up with some startling statements from time to time. Perhaps, Congress now has many who have been sidelined and need such props to climb again into reckoning.
“The same could be said of the Advani-Vajpayee response to Gujarat 2002: Advani lent tacit support to the incumbent chief minister and Vajpayee failed to enforce ‘Raj Dharma’.”
Ramani Venkatesan has hit the nail on its head. The above quote from this article, in my opinion, is why LK Advani cannot be given a clean chit.
If Modi government was dismissed over Gujarat riots as Atal ji wanted, Narendra Modi would have slipped back into oblivion from where he had emerged. So indirectly — Babri mosque is only one episode — LK Advani is responsible for all the turmoil in Indian society that has happened after installation of Modi government at the centre.
It is nice to see an ex-civil servant with clarity of thought on this issue and sharing his experience. He is right that Tharoor cannot be complimented on giving a free pass to Advani for his actions. Today, with Hindu extremists being in power, Tharoor probably feels that even a masjid-demolisher like Advani is a moderate!
extremist
/ɪkˈstriːmɪst,ɛkˈstriːmɪst/
nounDEROGATORY
a person who holds extreme political or religious views, especially one who advocates illegal, violent, or other extreme action.
Choose words as carefully as you care for the minorities who demolished what not since their rule which was particularly HINDU,SANATANA DHARMA. Yes, advani is not a moderate. Hell has not broken because of it. It’s people like you who create a divide between any. Your pseudo liberal thought won’t wipe out popular thought on Extremism. What HINDU terror you have observed in your life for that sake ? Don’t Tell me Gau rakshak Kahaani.
Kudos to Ramani for having the courage to speak the truth. In these times there are few who are willing to stick their neck out. If only there were more like Ramani, most sensitive issues could be resolved peacefully, and the nation would be the better for it.
The author’s comment “generosity and sanity must prevail” does sadly lacks deep thinking and impartiality. This sermon is certainly for those constituting majority population as has been followed for long by the so- called progressive thinkers. This state of affairs being lop- sided could not become a part of public etiquette and social behaviour.It was bound to collapse at some point of time .And why not? After all our civilization has been profusely wounded by Islamic violence that has left plenty of blood stained scars in every nook and corner of India.Babri was one such scars which was destined to be demolished one day, if not in 1992 then some other day or year.Even if Advani was principal perpetrator though he is certainly not, heaven has not fallen. I need not elaborate mediveal history and its imperative repercussions because if a Nuclear Scientist like me , knows something, a former civil servant will certainly be aware much more.Anyway, unless perfect secularism is observed, unlike the appeasement being always termed by Congress as secularism, the revengeful mind set will keep on getting intensified and thereby wrecking the nation. For all that happened Congress is covertly one of major stakeholders. Orthodox minority also can
not escape the blame owing to their parochial outlook being displayed in day to day actions.
In his nineties, Shri L K Advani is facing trial. He has a case to answer. 2. I once read of some senior leaders suggesting to him what they felt would be a fair, equitable solution to the Ayodhya dispute. He smiled cynically and said, In that case how would we fight the next election …
Bang on, Advani was the architect and executor of that demolition and author is absolutely right that if he really had a moment of repentance then he would have worked towards an out of court settlement. But probably he was too starry eyed of the possibility of his priministership that even if he had an iota of repentance it was drowned in his ambition.
SHASHI THAROOR and his supporters should also read Inside exclusive details in OUTLOOK HIND issues ( around 2006-2008 ) when we published all facts , records including video records of Advani and Vajpayee speech in Lucknow before demolishing disputed structure ( as claimed by them — AREA KO SAMATAL KARNA HAI . Also don’t forget who was Home Ministert and Deputy Prime Minister during 2002 of Gujarat riots and also guiding STATE GOVERNMENT
Majority of Indians attach their identity to the Sanatan Dharma which is called Hindu Dharma also. From time immemorial India had varied culture but religious identity and faith was one. Ramayana, Mahabharata and Vedas depicts one faith. When invaders succeeded to conquer Indian territory, the first thing they did was to destroy our symbols of faith, cultural identity and intelligentsia. They imposed their religion through force and violence and made us slave. When British left and freed the country, Islamic leaders said they can not coexist with non Islamic population and that Islam is different Nationality. Few Indian majority leaders still governed by Non violence and secularism agreed to divide the Nation based on Islamic Population. Even after division a large chunk of Islamic population retained in India. Then onward secularism became synonymous to Muslim appeasement.
A self respecting citizen with pride when reads the history to know how our places of worship were desecrated by barbaric invaders and demolished. Lacs of population butchered and intimidated, natural outcome is anguish.
We are now in free India we are reminded of this fact by such structures like Babari Masjid remains and failure to reconstruct Ram Mandir, every one feels bad. One party which governed this country for so long taught us secularism means suppressing majority feeling for appeasement of others.
Our so called intellectuals should work to convince every citizen that injustice even done in past must be corrected through consensus so as to restore prestige of majority population of land and not to give chance to politicians to take undue advantage.
Courts and constitution are made by People and are subject to review and corrections. Judiciary is also made of people which may at times reflect their own views. A balance approach is required where every one of us detach ourselves from history which brings us in Low light and reminds us of bleak past. New identity will be common Indian identity, cultural nationalism is not a wrong word.
One wonders if Tharoor has NOW taken to saying things that will directly attract the attention of Rahul and others who matter; much in the manner of Divya Spandana aka Ramya, and some others, who also come up with some startling statements from time to time. Perhaps, Congress now has many who have been sidelined and need such props to climb again into reckoning.
“The same could be said of the Advani-Vajpayee response to Gujarat 2002: Advani lent tacit support to the incumbent chief minister and Vajpayee failed to enforce ‘Raj Dharma’.”
Ramani Venkatesan has hit the nail on its head. The above quote from this article, in my opinion, is why LK Advani cannot be given a clean chit.
If Modi government was dismissed over Gujarat riots as Atal ji wanted, Narendra Modi would have slipped back into oblivion from where he had emerged. So indirectly — Babri mosque is only one episode — LK Advani is responsible for all the turmoil in Indian society that has happened after installation of Modi government at the centre.
It is nice to see an ex-civil servant with clarity of thought on this issue and sharing his experience. He is right that Tharoor cannot be complimented on giving a free pass to Advani for his actions. Today, with Hindu extremists being in power, Tharoor probably feels that even a masjid-demolisher like Advani is a moderate!
extremist
/ɪkˈstriːmɪst,ɛkˈstriːmɪst/
nounDEROGATORY
a person who holds extreme political or religious views, especially one who advocates illegal, violent, or other extreme action.
Choose words as carefully as you care for the minorities who demolished what not since their rule which was particularly HINDU,SANATANA DHARMA. Yes, advani is not a moderate. Hell has not broken because of it. It’s people like you who create a divide between any. Your pseudo liberal thought won’t wipe out popular thought on Extremism. What HINDU terror you have observed in your life for that sake ? Don’t Tell me Gau rakshak Kahaani.
Kudos to Ramani for having the courage to speak the truth. In these times there are few who are willing to stick their neck out. If only there were more like Ramani, most sensitive issues could be resolved peacefully, and the nation would be the better for it.
The author’s comment “generosity and sanity must prevail” does sadly lacks deep thinking and impartiality. This sermon is certainly for those constituting majority population as has been followed for long by the so- called progressive thinkers. This state of affairs being lop- sided could not become a part of public etiquette and social behaviour.It was bound to collapse at some point of time .And why not? After all our civilization has been profusely wounded by Islamic violence that has left plenty of blood stained scars in every nook and corner of India.Babri was one such scars which was destined to be demolished one day, if not in 1992 then some other day or year.Even if Advani was principal perpetrator though he is certainly not, heaven has not fallen. I need not elaborate mediveal history and its imperative repercussions because if a Nuclear Scientist like me , knows something, a former civil servant will certainly be aware much more.Anyway, unless perfect secularism is observed, unlike the appeasement being always termed by Congress as secularism, the revengeful mind set will keep on getting intensified and thereby wrecking the nation. For all that happened Congress is covertly one of major stakeholders. Orthodox minority also can
not escape the blame owing to their parochial outlook being displayed in day to day actions.
In his nineties, Shri L K Advani is facing trial. He has a case to answer. 2. I once read of some senior leaders suggesting to him what they felt would be a fair, equitable solution to the Ayodhya dispute. He smiled cynically and said, In that case how would we fight the next election …