This will allow several research organisations to directly sponsor highly-skilled individuals, such as specialist technicians, to work and train in the UK.
When asked to draw a scientist, studies found that younger children are more likely to draw female scientists. The tendency to stereotype increase with age.
The immediate benefit of Single Tax would be to reduce the sale prices of land to nominal ones. Landowners would no longer find it profitable to keep idle lands, wrote DM Kulkarni in 1960.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
If Pathaan gave both conservatives and liberals room to hide, Dhurandhar extends no such courtesy. Aditya Dhar ripped open that tent of hypocrisy and turned the knife.
This is at best, a mistake in data analysis or in taking data.
The possibility of somebody from IISC cooking up data for the biggest discovery in the field seems unlikely.
If they had to cheat, these chemists would have done that in a chemistry journal, and on something not this big.
The authors are really not backing down from their claims, and unless more progress happens, nothing can be said.
Most importantly, science moves slow, and we should let the authors take their sweet time.
Alleging them of data fabrication is a huge misconduct on our side, and it will discourage people from taking risks or doing science.
They should not have put it in the http://arxiv.org/, instead, the internal validation would have been much safe. However, since now the results are available in arxiv they have the claim on their discovery. I am sure the result produced could never be the fabric, they are from the experiments. Please don’t use the derogatory words to prove yourselves to be foolish. The people of IISc knows the depth of science.
It can’t be case of fabrication. He has still not published it. Moreover any average researcher know how much bang it can create in the field and he can get embarrassed if it can’t get replicated by others. So it will be more harmful to his reputation in fabricating the data. Don’t jump to any conclusions. It’s just a preprint not any final publication. Let him come with explanation. Moreover Prof TVR is a highly recognised theoretician who had written commendable papers with Noble Laureate Prof Anderson. If he has given a reason, it will have some substance.
This is a fabrication, it’s not at all possible. We will see as time unfolds. There are many such fake research at IISc n recent times, but nobody not even government seems to care. This time they have been caught, professors are involved in this they must hanged.
Hanged? You are definitely not from a scientific background. It’s not petty politics where we randomly hang people for allegations of wrongdoing. This community is far more tolerant and logical than that. Nothing, i repeat, nothing is proven against them yet.
Or maybe you just don’t know anything and proving yourself to be an as*hole by saying that. Bcz it’s just a preprint, paper is yet to be published. And know scientist will fabricate data in such a way that it will affect their own reputation when experiment is repeated by other fellow scientists…
This is at best, a mistake in data analysis or in taking data.
The possibility of somebody from IISC cooking up data for the biggest discovery in the field seems unlikely.
If they had to cheat, these chemists would have done that in a chemistry journal, and on something not this big.
The authors are really not backing down from their claims, and unless more progress happens, nothing can be said.
Most importantly, science moves slow, and we should let the authors take their sweet time.
Alleging them of data fabrication is a huge misconduct on our side, and it will discourage people from taking risks or doing science.
They should not have put it in the http://arxiv.org/, instead, the internal validation would have been much safe. However, since now the results are available in arxiv they have the claim on their discovery. I am sure the result produced could never be the fabric, they are from the experiments. Please don’t use the derogatory words to prove yourselves to be foolish. The people of IISc knows the depth of science.
It can’t be case of fabrication. He has still not published it. Moreover any average researcher know how much bang it can create in the field and he can get embarrassed if it can’t get replicated by others. So it will be more harmful to his reputation in fabricating the data. Don’t jump to any conclusions. It’s just a preprint not any final publication. Let him come with explanation. Moreover Prof TVR is a highly recognised theoretician who had written commendable papers with Noble Laureate Prof Anderson. If he has given a reason, it will have some substance.
This is a fabrication, it’s not at all possible. We will see as time unfolds. There are many such fake research at IISc n recent times, but nobody not even government seems to care. This time they have been caught, professors are involved in this they must hanged.
Hanged? You are definitely not from a scientific background. It’s not petty politics where we randomly hang people for allegations of wrongdoing. This community is far more tolerant and logical than that. Nothing, i repeat, nothing is proven against them yet.
Or maybe you just don’t know anything and proving yourself to be an as*hole by saying that. Bcz it’s just a preprint, paper is yet to be published. And know scientist will fabricate data in such a way that it will affect their own reputation when experiment is repeated by other fellow scientists…