AAP leader Sanjay Singh has said the property owned by Nirav Modi & other fugitives in the country should be auctioned by the government to return people's money.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While Pakistani authorities have not clarified what intended target was, the incident adds to a troubling pattern of PAF strikes killing civilians, including women and children.
Many really smart people now share the position that playing cricket with Pakistan is politically, strategically and morally wrong. It is just a poor appreciation of competitive sport.
Hi somehow an AAP persopnnel raise a justified geneine questions of fellow country men , carryon the motive , please raise above petty cheap issue make a swacch samarpit simplified samridh Sindhu Bharat
Thumps Down. AAP must know that something has been achieved. You started your party to fight against corruption and you joined hands with those against your Basic principles. One can see the classic example that how Money and Power can corrupt in modern time.
Arrest is part of a legal process to bring Nirav Modi back to India, to face the law. Welcome development. 2. When one scamster flees with an unpaid bill of 13,000 crores it does not hurt us the way it should, for no one is making a proportionate debit to our funds lying in the bank. There was a proposed amendment to the law – fortunately dropped – that would have allowed banks to freeze part of depositors’ funds and convert them into ( worthless ) equity. Recap funds are being burnt through by banks to defray losses, without enhancing their capacity to lend to productive sectors. MUDRA loans have started turning sour. Mr Chidambaram hinted once that there is no sovereign guarantee for funds lying in deposit with PSBs. Politicians being what they are, expect drastic surgery only when it is no longer possible to kick the can further down the road.
How is it that one gets the distinct feeling that the AAP, founded supposedly on the cry for a corruption-free India, would have much preferred that Nirav Modi had not been arrested? The AAP seems to be worreid that Nirav Modi might be extradited soon to India. That court testimony by Nirav Modi might help identify bad actors in PNB. That Nirav might have to face the consequences of his criminal actions. That the entire saga will help move India toward a less corrupt society and a more law-abiding society. Why does AAP prefer to protect the corrupt and rejoice when the corrupt are caught? Why?
Hi somehow an AAP persopnnel raise a justified geneine questions of fellow country men , carryon the motive , please raise above petty cheap issue make a swacch samarpit simplified samridh Sindhu Bharat
Thumps Down. AAP must know that something has been achieved. You started your party to fight against corruption and you joined hands with those against your Basic principles. One can see the classic example that how Money and Power can corrupt in modern time.
Politicians are also playing vital role in huge money loan to business men,
Arrest is part of a legal process to bring Nirav Modi back to India, to face the law. Welcome development. 2. When one scamster flees with an unpaid bill of 13,000 crores it does not hurt us the way it should, for no one is making a proportionate debit to our funds lying in the bank. There was a proposed amendment to the law – fortunately dropped – that would have allowed banks to freeze part of depositors’ funds and convert them into ( worthless ) equity. Recap funds are being burnt through by banks to defray losses, without enhancing their capacity to lend to productive sectors. MUDRA loans have started turning sour. Mr Chidambaram hinted once that there is no sovereign guarantee for funds lying in deposit with PSBs. Politicians being what they are, expect drastic surgery only when it is no longer possible to kick the can further down the road.
How is it that one gets the distinct feeling that the AAP, founded supposedly on the cry for a corruption-free India, would have much preferred that Nirav Modi had not been arrested? The AAP seems to be worreid that Nirav Modi might be extradited soon to India. That court testimony by Nirav Modi might help identify bad actors in PNB. That Nirav might have to face the consequences of his criminal actions. That the entire saga will help move India toward a less corrupt society and a more law-abiding society. Why does AAP prefer to protect the corrupt and rejoice when the corrupt are caught? Why?