Pope Francis' historic visit to the UAE and Abu Dhabi's Crown Prince building an Abrahamic Family House show the increasing acceptance of religious diplomacy.
As Delhi elections near, AAP focus has turned to religion — be it Ravidas protests or tirth yatras — a far cry from 2017 when health, education were its poll agendas.
The Supreme Court’s judgment pushes the conversation in the right direction, but it does not resolve the full range of structural issues that determine how tribunals work on the ground.
The Centre is considering an increase in the National Company Law Tribunal's bench capacity, while the Standing Committee of Finance suggests fast-track courts.
The helicopters produced by Lockheed Martin are known as ‘submarine hunters’. India ordered 24 of these aircraft in 2020 to replace the Sea King helicopters. 15 have been delivered till date.
The India-South Africa series-defining fact is the catastrophic decline of Indian red ball cricket where a visiting team can mock us with the 'grovel' word.
The writer itself is a muslim so what do we expect more. Obviously he is going to lean his empty head towards fake nationalist who imitated Gandhi’s footsteps. I don’t mean harm or offence to muslims who are against jinnah’s ideology and the partition of india.
What a wonderful article to create a biased view in favour of a biased man. Jinnah was great, he wanted a “secular” Pakistan, such that he can be its ruler. Fair enough? This article just wanted to test how many would ascribe to this idea. Unfortunately not many in favour…
Let me believe whatever you are projecting in this article, Jinnah was a Secular, great, symbol of H-M unity blah-blah. Please answer, why was Pakistan created then?
Because of what is happening to the Muslims in India. He knew this would always be the case and he has been proved right.
Well, you should ask Bangladeshi, I’m sure they have a word or two to say about it.
Joginder Nath Mondal, whom you refer to as symbol of communal Jinnah;s secularism, fled to India from Karachi in Oct 1950, accusing the Jinnah-Liaqat administration of carrying out liquidation and genocide of Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan.
Pakistan has carried out genocide of Hindus and Sikhs and the greatest massacres were carried out under Jinnah-Liaqat administration in the 1947-1950 period. Please read the 17 page resignation leter of Joginder Nath Mondal as he fled to India to save himself from muslim killers.
Jinnah was 100% right in creating Pak and eventually Bangladesh. Seeing how much Hindus and Muslims hate each other, if India was a united country there would have been sectarian riots daily all across India. South Asia is the home of Illiteracy and Hate.
Every one knows that if a muslim is killed by a muslim , it is no issue and vice versa for hindus. In this animal kingdom of hate, religious bigotry, racist chauvinism, sense of caste superiority; every division of pak and india is welcome and quite right.
Yasser bhai if Stanley Wolport’s Jinnah of Pakistan is right then the Quaid was ambassador of Hindu Muslim unity only so long as he , not Nehru, was made PM of independent India. By the way what happened to the lakhs of Biharis still stuck in “East Pakistan” who fought against Mukti Vahini, along side Tiger Niazi led blundering, plundering and surrendering Pak Army.
why allow such stupids to write articles here.
writer is following what Jnnah said..we are seeing what he DID.
he did partition the nation on basis of religion..he did impose Urdu on bangladesh ppl (not letting them be bengali first)
Jinnha invoked islam all te time..when did congres invoked Hinduism/sikh/islam ?
in short, Jinnah is the mail culprit behind all these illgeal immigrats stuff..had he neither imposed urdu, imposed Islam, army-dictatorship in pakistan – neither there would have been heavy handed acts in E-pakistan..and neither would have been mass scale rapes,murder and displacement
Jinnah is themail cuplrit behind secatian and religion issues in India/bangladesh/pakistan
What nonsense this guy writes , read all paper statements made by Jinnah from 1940 onwards, he clearly very clearly stated that Pakistan will be governed by Sharia , read them just google them , under sharia Znon Muslims will be treated as third class citizens and that is what happening in Pakistan, Hindus need to first eliminate these liberals to regain their unity , just go and see in Kashmir and see any Hindus left over there
Who wants a citizenship law when India will have only Hindus , that’s why Pakistan donot care about their citizen ship law
BR PREPARED FOR THE RSS IT CELL TO ORDER THEIR CADRES TO RUBBISH THIS ARTICLE.
WATCH THESE HALF EDUCATED CREATURES TO COME UP WITH THEIR OWN VERSION OF HISTORY.
WITH THE FREEDOM OF THE INTERNET THE GAME IS UP, FOR THESE FAKE NEWS, FAKE HISTORY COMMUNAL STORYTELLERS.
ANYONE CAN NOW READ THE WORKS AND STUDY THE SPEECHES OF BOTH JINNAH AND SAVAKAR AND MAKE THEIR OWN MINDS UP.
ITS ALL RATHER PATHETIC REALLY, IF IT WAS NOT SO DANGEROUS, RSS THOUGHT LEADS TO MURDER AND LYNCHING, THOSE WHO MURDER IN COMMUNAL RIOTS THEN GO ON TO RAPE AND POLLUTE INDIAN SOCIETY
Some may find it curious that we are still arguing about a Hindu Muslim squabble seventy three years after Partition.
But this appears not so strange when one considers the RSS has kept this hatred alive all these years.
Hatred for the Muslim is the oxygen that feeds this communal monster.
It’s at the core of their ideology and writings of Savakar.
It’s hatred for Muslims that these people win elections.
As a Muslim citizen of India who has visited Pakistan I can say no such hatred exists the other side of our border.
Without the Muslim bogey the RSS is finished. If all the Muslims vanished from India the RSS will have to invent some to target and get votes.
This fascism started a long time before Jinnah made his appearance from london.
Their Guru even justified rape as a weapon in an endless war against Muslims.
Read a Savakar line by lime to understand what inspires these evil people, the RSS who threw children into the fire under their Savakar worshipping Parachark in Gujarat.
and who kept hatred towards other communities in india, pakistan, Bangladesh alive yet ?
ethnic and sectarian issues in pakistan/Bangladesh.
IM, SIMI cardes are from indian muslim..Al-Queda, ISIS sypathisers and joining from among India muslims..
who started godhra rioting and planted bombs in Bombay in 93 ?
wake to reality uncle..there are comunal figures among all groups/sects/religions
Given one hundred and seventy million Muslims in India, according to Ajit Doval less than a dozen have joined ISIS.
The Muslim community in India is peaceful.
Before RSS came about, people identified themselves by the region they belonged to, the language they spoke, their caste.
It was never Hindu or Muslim identity.
This RSS splitting people into Hindu Muslim is a relatively recent phenomenon from the decades pre partition.
The RSS was started by Marathi Chitpavan Brahmins who initially wanted India too keep the caste structure in a united Hindu Rashtra.
The Muslims in India do not have an engine of hate incessantly fuelling riots via a fascist communal ideology.
Savakar wrote “The Status of Muslims must be akin to that of Jews in Germany “ this was before Jinnah came into the scenes.
Probably your opinion. One most people do not agree with. Look around and you will see that if Muslims has no one to rape or torture, they usually do it to their own.
“As a Muslim citizen of India who has visited Pakistan I can say no such hatred exists the other side of our border.”
-Sau choohay kha kay billi haj ko chali.
After reducing Hindus/Sikhs to 1% of the population ( from 27-30%), there is hardly anyone left to hate.
Even Hindus in India would not hate Muslims if they had left for Pakistan and were only 1% of the Indian population
The Hindu population migrated during the time of partition.
If you wish fo whataboutry!
Then what about the 200,000 Muslim massacred in Jummu and the huge exodus of the Muslim population. Google it and educate yourself.
I could go on.
Bye the way you are an example of Muslim hate.
You have been brainwashed by the RSS probably since very young and you do not know it.
This is why a facist ideology is so dangerous.
why dont muslims leave india-ilive in danmark-nomasjids, burkhe banned, musslims r hated.some danes want to expeel muslims.
ROFLMAO….. yeah, then why call yourself Islamic Republic, set up a capital called, what else, Islamabad, constitutionally bar non-Muslims from holding high office, incl the military.
Pakistan was created with “god in every pocket” and since then it is a triple A country — Allah, Army and America!
Jinnah demanded and Congress conceded, and Lo! we had Pakistan? Poor Savarkar took the blame for Two Nation theory. Though Dr.Ambedkar openly supported formation of Pakistan by writing a small book, none dare call him a supporter of Two Nation Theory!
I draw an entirely different lesson from this. Leaders, in their misguided wisdom, will take nuanced positions on complex issues while making lawyerly (not sure if that is a word) , politically expedient arguments, coated with a dollop of moral positioning, but the reality on the ground will always be very different.
Political positions very often unleash forces in society which are hard to control. They cater to the basest of emotions, prejudice, violence and ignorance which leads to unspeakable acts of cruelty in society. It is not as if people articulating these points of view are not aware of their consequences. Jinnah and the Muslim League knew what they were doing. Gandhi mixed religion with politics freely too. All of their nuances can be debated, but they were all recipes for disaster.
Seventy years later, we are now “solving” the solution of that disaster by making more nuanced arguments. History repeats itself.
The Article deliberately hides the fact and conveniently misrepresent the situation of that time.
1. Write mention the name of Joginder Nath Mandal, but hide the fact that Joginder Nath Mandal had to run away from pakistan and took shelter in India later on. He on record admitted that it was a greatest mistake to rely on Muslim League. The riots of East pakistan just after creation of Pakistan where Namshudras community was massacred happened when Jinnah was head of Pakistan estate
2. Direct Action Day which triggered “The Great Calcutta Killings” was conceived and executed by Muslim League headed my Mr Jinnah
3. Duplicity on various things were shown by Jinnah. He accepted the accession of Junagarh (despite Hindu majority) but sent tribal invaders in Kashmir when India did the same ( as Kashmir was Muslim majority)
you can not hide the history though you can misrepresent that. You can not take away the criminality of killings millions of peoples due to Partition from Jinnah. He was mail culprit for the massacre of 1947.
The writer itself is a muslim so what do we expect more. Obviously he is going to lean his empty head towards fake nationalist who imitated Gandhi’s footsteps. I don’t mean harm or offence to muslims who are against jinnah’s ideology and the partition of india.
What a wonderful article to create a biased view in favour of a biased man. Jinnah was great, he wanted a “secular” Pakistan, such that he can be its ruler. Fair enough? This article just wanted to test how many would ascribe to this idea. Unfortunately not many in favour…
Let me believe whatever you are projecting in this article, Jinnah was a Secular, great, symbol of H-M unity blah-blah. Please answer, why was Pakistan created then?
Because of what is happening to the Muslims in India. He knew this would always be the case and he has been proved right.
Well, you should ask Bangladeshi, I’m sure they have a word or two to say about it.
Joginder Nath Mondal, whom you refer to as symbol of communal Jinnah;s secularism, fled to India from Karachi in Oct 1950, accusing the Jinnah-Liaqat administration of carrying out liquidation and genocide of Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan.
Pakistan has carried out genocide of Hindus and Sikhs and the greatest massacres were carried out under Jinnah-Liaqat administration in the 1947-1950 period. Please read the 17 page resignation leter of Joginder Nath Mondal as he fled to India to save himself from muslim killers.
Jinnah was 100% right in creating Pak and eventually Bangladesh. Seeing how much Hindus and Muslims hate each other, if India was a united country there would have been sectarian riots daily all across India. South Asia is the home of Illiteracy and Hate.
Every one knows that if a muslim is killed by a muslim , it is no issue and vice versa for hindus. In this animal kingdom of hate, religious bigotry, racist chauvinism, sense of caste superiority; every division of pak and india is welcome and quite right.
Yasser bhai if Stanley Wolport’s Jinnah of Pakistan is right then the Quaid was ambassador of Hindu Muslim unity only so long as he , not Nehru, was made PM of independent India. By the way what happened to the lakhs of Biharis still stuck in “East Pakistan” who fought against Mukti Vahini, along side Tiger Niazi led blundering, plundering and surrendering Pak Army.
why allow such stupids to write articles here.
writer is following what Jnnah said..we are seeing what he DID.
he did partition the nation on basis of religion..he did impose Urdu on bangladesh ppl (not letting them be bengali first)
Jinnha invoked islam all te time..when did congres invoked Hinduism/sikh/islam ?
in short, Jinnah is the mail culprit behind all these illgeal immigrats stuff..had he neither imposed urdu, imposed Islam, army-dictatorship in pakistan – neither there would have been heavy handed acts in E-pakistan..and neither would have been mass scale rapes,murder and displacement
Jinnah is themail cuplrit behind secatian and religion issues in India/bangladesh/pakistan
Is this the same Anonymous who is after the skin of Shivam ??
What nonsense this guy writes , read all paper statements made by Jinnah from 1940 onwards, he clearly very clearly stated that Pakistan will be governed by Sharia , read them just google them , under sharia Znon Muslims will be treated as third class citizens and that is what happening in Pakistan, Hindus need to first eliminate these liberals to regain their unity , just go and see in Kashmir and see any Hindus left over there
Who wants a citizenship law when India will have only Hindus , that’s why Pakistan donot care about their citizen ship law
BR PREPARED FOR THE RSS IT CELL TO ORDER THEIR CADRES TO RUBBISH THIS ARTICLE.
WATCH THESE HALF EDUCATED CREATURES TO COME UP WITH THEIR OWN VERSION OF HISTORY.
WITH THE FREEDOM OF THE INTERNET THE GAME IS UP, FOR THESE FAKE NEWS, FAKE HISTORY COMMUNAL STORYTELLERS.
ANYONE CAN NOW READ THE WORKS AND STUDY THE SPEECHES OF BOTH JINNAH AND SAVAKAR AND MAKE THEIR OWN MINDS UP.
ITS ALL RATHER PATHETIC REALLY, IF IT WAS NOT SO DANGEROUS, RSS THOUGHT LEADS TO MURDER AND LYNCHING, THOSE WHO MURDER IN COMMUNAL RIOTS THEN GO ON TO RAPE AND POLLUTE INDIAN SOCIETY
Some may find it curious that we are still arguing about a Hindu Muslim squabble seventy three years after Partition.
But this appears not so strange when one considers the RSS has kept this hatred alive all these years.
Hatred for the Muslim is the oxygen that feeds this communal monster.
It’s at the core of their ideology and writings of Savakar.
It’s hatred for Muslims that these people win elections.
As a Muslim citizen of India who has visited Pakistan I can say no such hatred exists the other side of our border.
Without the Muslim bogey the RSS is finished. If all the Muslims vanished from India the RSS will have to invent some to target and get votes.
This fascism started a long time before Jinnah made his appearance from london.
Their Guru even justified rape as a weapon in an endless war against Muslims.
Read a Savakar line by lime to understand what inspires these evil people, the RSS who threw children into the fire under their Savakar worshipping Parachark in Gujarat.
and who kept hatred towards other communities in india, pakistan, Bangladesh alive yet ?
ethnic and sectarian issues in pakistan/Bangladesh.
IM, SIMI cardes are from indian muslim..Al-Queda, ISIS sypathisers and joining from among India muslims..
who started godhra rioting and planted bombs in Bombay in 93 ?
wake to reality uncle..there are comunal figures among all groups/sects/religions
Given one hundred and seventy million Muslims in India, according to Ajit Doval less than a dozen have joined ISIS.
The Muslim community in India is peaceful.
Before RSS came about, people identified themselves by the region they belonged to, the language they spoke, their caste.
It was never Hindu or Muslim identity.
This RSS splitting people into Hindu Muslim is a relatively recent phenomenon from the decades pre partition.
The RSS was started by Marathi Chitpavan Brahmins who initially wanted India too keep the caste structure in a united Hindu Rashtra.
The Muslims in India do not have an engine of hate incessantly fuelling riots via a fascist communal ideology.
Savakar wrote “The Status of Muslims must be akin to that of Jews in Germany “ this was before Jinnah came into the scenes.
Probably your opinion. One most people do not agree with. Look around and you will see that if Muslims has no one to rape or torture, they usually do it to their own.
“As a Muslim citizen of India who has visited Pakistan I can say no such hatred exists the other side of our border.”
-Sau choohay kha kay billi haj ko chali.
After reducing Hindus/Sikhs to 1% of the population ( from 27-30%), there is hardly anyone left to hate.
Even Hindus in India would not hate Muslims if they had left for Pakistan and were only 1% of the Indian population
The Hindu population migrated during the time of partition.
If you wish fo whataboutry!
Then what about the 200,000 Muslim massacred in Jummu and the huge exodus of the Muslim population. Google it and educate yourself.
I could go on.
Bye the way you are an example of Muslim hate.
You have been brainwashed by the RSS probably since very young and you do not know it.
This is why a facist ideology is so dangerous.
why dont muslims leave india-ilive in danmark-nomasjids, burkhe banned, musslims r hated.some danes want to expeel muslims.
ROFLMAO….. yeah, then why call yourself Islamic Republic, set up a capital called, what else, Islamabad, constitutionally bar non-Muslims from holding high office, incl the military.
Pakistan was created with “god in every pocket” and since then it is a triple A country — Allah, Army and America!
Jinnah founded a country in which a non Muslim even can’t be the president. Enough for your paki worshipping.
Jinnah demanded and Congress conceded, and Lo! we had Pakistan? Poor Savarkar took the blame for Two Nation theory. Though Dr.Ambedkar openly supported formation of Pakistan by writing a small book, none dare call him a supporter of Two Nation Theory!
Why the demand for Pakistan then? That question remains unanswered if we go by your article.
I draw an entirely different lesson from this. Leaders, in their misguided wisdom, will take nuanced positions on complex issues while making lawyerly (not sure if that is a word) , politically expedient arguments, coated with a dollop of moral positioning, but the reality on the ground will always be very different.
Political positions very often unleash forces in society which are hard to control. They cater to the basest of emotions, prejudice, violence and ignorance which leads to unspeakable acts of cruelty in society. It is not as if people articulating these points of view are not aware of their consequences. Jinnah and the Muslim League knew what they were doing. Gandhi mixed religion with politics freely too. All of their nuances can be debated, but they were all recipes for disaster.
Seventy years later, we are now “solving” the solution of that disaster by making more nuanced arguments. History repeats itself.
The Article deliberately hides the fact and conveniently misrepresent the situation of that time.
1. Write mention the name of Joginder Nath Mandal, but hide the fact that Joginder Nath Mandal had to run away from pakistan and took shelter in India later on. He on record admitted that it was a greatest mistake to rely on Muslim League. The riots of East pakistan just after creation of Pakistan where Namshudras community was massacred happened when Jinnah was head of Pakistan estate
2. Direct Action Day which triggered “The Great Calcutta Killings” was conceived and executed by Muslim League headed my Mr Jinnah
3. Duplicity on various things were shown by Jinnah. He accepted the accession of Junagarh (despite Hindu majority) but sent tribal invaders in Kashmir when India did the same ( as Kashmir was Muslim majority)
you can not hide the history though you can misrepresent that. You can not take away the criminality of killings millions of peoples due to Partition from Jinnah. He was mail culprit for the massacre of 1947.
There are ample