Muslims would do better to think about whether the public performance of religion strengthens or weakens secularism—the idea in which they have the highest stake.
BJP says ‘while some detractors attempted to dismiss former MLC N. Ramchander Rao as low-profile choice, those familiar with party’s inner workings recognise his credibility’.
Kolkata cops arrested Panoli from Gurugram over Instagram video in which she made alleged controversial remarks on Prophet. Court has remanded her to judicial custody till 13 June.
The MLA was suspended by BJP and arrested by Telangana police last year over alleged derogatory remarks on Prophet Muhammad. He was lone winning BJP candidate in 2018 Telangana polls.
In 2020, Singh was banned by Facebook for violating its hate speech policy. On Tuesday, he was arrested for his alleged remarks against the Prophet Muhammad.
In a recent survey of law school admissions officers, 94% said the current political climate in the US played at least a moderate role in the increase.
New CPI series will take 2024 as base year, will provide more accurate measure of inflation, spending on digital services. Expected to enhance representation and reliability, says Saurabh Garg.
The agreement, signed after meeting between Rajnath and US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on sidelines of ADMM-Plus in Kuala Lumpur, aims to deepen bilateral ties in the critical sector.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
Mr. Bharati does not hedge. His essays command the reader’s attention from the get-go… The way he gets to the heart of any question that stirs his consciousness is staggering. This article of his, too, like many earlier ones, bears testimony to what a fine mind he is. Armed with a deep knowledge of Islam, its history and of the psyche of the faithful, he presents his arguments so logically and with such authenticity that only those not enough knowledgeable or out-and-out intransigent would have the courage to be on at him.
Mr. Bharati does not hedge. His essays command the reader’s attention from the get-go… The way he gets to the heart of any question that stirs his consciousness is staggering. This article of his, too, like many earlier ones, bears testimony to a fine mind that he is. Armed with a deep knowledge of Islam, its history and of the psyche of the faithful, he presents his arguments so logically and with such authenticity that only those not enough knowledgeable or out-and-out intransigent would have the courage to be on at him.
The central question of the article is trite (“Would their theology, ideology, religious discourse, political narrative, and societal restrictions let them wear Ram’s love on the sleeve?”)
The entire faith begins with a repudiation of everything it defines as outside its axioms as low and unworthy (“There is no god but God”, or by implication, “No deity is worthy of worship but God”). It should hardly come as a surprise, then, that anyone who “testifies” to this “truth” must necessarily, as a corollary, not just opt out of, but actively oppose any “respect,” symbolic or otherwise, for any “other.”
Mr. Bharati does not hedge. His essays command the reader’s attention from the get-go… The way he gets to the heart of any question that stirs his consciousness is staggering. This article of his, too, like many earlier ones, bears testimony to what a fine mind he is. Armed with a deep knowledge of Islam, its history and of the psyche of the faithful, he presents his arguments so logically and with such authenticity that only those not enough knowledgeable or out-and-out intransigent would have the courage to be on at him.
Mr. Bharati does not hedge. His essays command the reader’s attention from the get-go… The way he gets to the heart of any question that stirs his consciousness is staggering. This article of his, too, like many earlier ones, bears testimony to a fine mind that he is. Armed with a deep knowledge of Islam, its history and of the psyche of the faithful, he presents his arguments so logically and with such authenticity that only those not enough knowledgeable or out-and-out intransigent would have the courage to be on at him.
The central question of the article is trite (“Would their theology, ideology, religious discourse, political narrative, and societal restrictions let them wear Ram’s love on the sleeve?”)
The entire faith begins with a repudiation of everything it defines as outside its axioms as low and unworthy (“There is no god but God”, or by implication, “No deity is worthy of worship but God”). It should hardly come as a surprise, then, that anyone who “testifies” to this “truth” must necessarily, as a corollary, not just opt out of, but actively oppose any “respect,” symbolic or otherwise, for any “other.”