Speaking to ThePrint RS MP Ram Chander Jangra stood by his statement, asserting it was made in specific context as he was at a function to celebrate birth anniversary of Rani Ahilyabai.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
Really feel sad and frustrated after reading your news article but also happy that you have reported this the shameful act of honorable member of Rajya Sabha. I fully appreciate and salute your guts to show real face of such shameless people.
Sometimes I wonder does our country really needed democracy? See what kind of leaders represent the citizens of our country. I only hope people will be more careful while voting.
May God save us all and our country.
Women are equal to men, and in many cases much better. No doubt that this is true in the matter of courage and loyalty. The terrorists wouldn’t have killed women because that would have reflected on their social sense of bravery.
Thus, if the women had shielded the men – perhaps many people would have been saved or the terrorists would have perhaps been delayed enough for others to come and intervene.
This same strategy can be used to save lives in times of war – by enabling women to come forward and defend the lives of men, and their own lives. However, menfolk will feel highly humiliated by this suggestion, even though it’s intelligent and practical….and they will vociferously oppose it, and claim that they are more courageous, etc, etc.
In matters of business, it can be observed that many business people keep all their wealth in the names of their women – specially those who are corrupt or exploitative – they keep all their ill-gotten wealth in their wives, daughters’ and minors’ names. It’s obviously very difficult for the law abiding authorities to go after the women. It’s the Shikhandi principle.
You can check for yourselves how the ultra rich coaching owners of Delhi and Kota guard their ill-gotten wealth – the gentlemen don’t own anything, but their partners do. You can also see how the authorities bend over backwards (in a show of chivalry) to please the women – once a woman’s name is on it – it’s a social phenomenon.
All in all, it’s not a bad idea – is it?
Really feel sad and frustrated after reading your news article but also happy that you have reported this the shameful act of honorable member of Rajya Sabha. I fully appreciate and salute your guts to show real face of such shameless people.
Sometimes I wonder does our country really needed democracy? See what kind of leaders represent the citizens of our country. I only hope people will be more careful while voting.
May God save us all and our country.
Women are equal to men, and in many cases much better. No doubt that this is true in the matter of courage and loyalty. The terrorists wouldn’t have killed women because that would have reflected on their social sense of bravery.
Thus, if the women had shielded the men – perhaps many people would have been saved or the terrorists would have perhaps been delayed enough for others to come and intervene.
This same strategy can be used to save lives in times of war – by enabling women to come forward and defend the lives of men, and their own lives. However, menfolk will feel highly humiliated by this suggestion, even though it’s intelligent and practical….and they will vociferously oppose it, and claim that they are more courageous, etc, etc.
In matters of business, it can be observed that many business people keep all their wealth in the names of their women – specially those who are corrupt or exploitative – they keep all their ill-gotten wealth in their wives, daughters’ and minors’ names. It’s obviously very difficult for the law abiding authorities to go after the women. It’s the Shikhandi principle.
You can check for yourselves how the ultra rich coaching owners of Delhi and Kota guard their ill-gotten wealth – the gentlemen don’t own anything, but their partners do. You can also see how the authorities bend over backwards (in a show of chivalry) to please the women – once a woman’s name is on it – it’s a social phenomenon.
All in all, it’s not a bad idea – is it?
He should ask if his female relatives if they would have had courage to do this.