On Saturday, Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan faced protests during his speech at the 80th session of Indian History Congress. ABVP has condemned the protest.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi alleged the poor will be forced to bribe officials to ensure they remain citizens, making NRC-NPR exercise another kind of tax.
Our study presents evidence suggestive of the fact that farmers who demonstrate greater knowledge about the importance of potassium tend to achieve higher yields and revenues.
Open to public feedback until 26 November, the revised guidelines, among other changes, give CA firms more flexibility to advertise & promote their services.
Bihar is blessed with a land more fertile for revolutions than any in India. Why has it fallen so far behind then? Constant obsession with politics is at the root of its destruction.
This article is baseless , hypothetically creating panic among muslims , Writer of the article itself is in ambiguity who is unable to see difference between NRC and CAA.and he passed his verdict that CAA is unconstitutional while matter is pending with court. CAA and NRC both are clearly different things. NRC is applicable for all persons in Assam irrespective of religion where CAA is for granting citizenship of suffering minorities coming from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afganistan only three countries upto 31/12/2014. and not snatching citizenship of any Indian. Does writer think Muslim is minority in Pakistan or in Bangladesh or in Afganistan who is refugee in India? Acquiring Indian citizenship for foreigners including Muslims (section 6 of the citizenship Act) or Section 5 is still operational and it is not affected in any way by CAA. Writer of the article should see through lens of Welfare State of Indian constitution rather than communal lens for provoking or misguiding.
what kind of system is this… that give any tom dick and harry passport… people living in foreign countries are not handed passports… once you apply for passports you require to show certain documents how can passport which clearly states nationality = Indian is not enough… i lived in russia for one year.. did they gave me citizenship ?? what non sense.. is this.. people should stop giving votes to pakoda friers.
Suppose a muslim has been living in India for 50 years and he does not have any of the described documents by the government or he does not come under the enacted rules which will be later told by the government.What would happen to those?
50 saal se India me rehe raha documents nahi hai to ab Tak Kya bhajiya tal raha tha
I think tibbitian Nepalese and srilankakan migrants should learn Urdu nd then bribe bureaucrats they will claim refugee without documents from three countries….. Surely will get citizenship
Nepalese are legal migrants , indian and Nepalese can work in each other countries without restrictions as they have an agreement regarding this . For bhutan , you need to work permit and Tibetans are recognised as legal refugees by government . Srilanka na were also given indian citizenship
As many or more Hindus are migrating out than the saffron crowd is inviting the Hindu refugee. in. Ganges can handle 3 or 4 Kumbh mela at the same time if that is what the saffron crowd wants.
If you were an illegal immigrant, how could the date of entry into India be documented , since this was a secret entry across borders ? If one was a minority in say Afghanistan, why would their GOvt issue a certificate regarding one’s religion ? It doesn’t make sense. Finally if one was persecuted there, who would certify that ? WHy would a Govt indict itself ?
The author’s point is that most applicants for citizenship under CAA will not have even a single document that is theoretically required.
Agreed with the article, but we must also have the guts to demand that CAA include ALL genuine refugees… that is what India is asking. Do not use religion as a discriminator – do not trash our constitution.
Good analysis! This is only the second article by Shivam in which he does not come across as a juvenile twit. We have to await the notification of detailed rules under CAA. But the bigger picture is that it is imperative for India to document the list of citizens so that we can identify illegal immigrants going forward – otherwise, we have no country. Nobody will question the need to ensure that no legitimate citizen of India will lose her citizenship. But the fear of how well the government will do that job cannot prevent us from securing vital national interests. We have enough safeguards through our legal systems to everybody. The entire lefty mediawallahs and their political masters are guilty of fanning a disinformation campaign against CAA.
I agree with Shivam. We need to remove all arbitrariness in government, and not allow government employees to use any discretionary powers.
Of course, I also hope Shivam supports my advocacy on another issue: We should not allow government employees to use their discretion in hiring for the UPSC-based services. Here, I mean the use of group discussions and interviews to perform a holistic evaluation of candidates – basically a ruse to get in more minority and deprived candidates (this is how Shah Faesal and other J&K candidates are topping the civil services exams, by the way).
I think we all know which way Shivam will swing on this one!
Lincon was a slave owner himself. And Gandhi never accepted that India was only for Hindus – that is why he was murdered by NRG. Nehru did not accept India as solely Hindu either and remember that HE was a Kashmiri Pandit. In any case, India is secular and if it does not remain so, it will not be India. So anyone saying India is only for Hindus is anti-India.
Where is this written that Gandhiji divided this county on the basis of religion
The law of unintended consequences: just as Muslims are told to go to Pakistan, now Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan will be told to go to India.
So dear Modiji has done a great disservice not only to Indian Muslims, but also to Hindus in neighboring countries.
This article is baseless , hypothetically creating panic among muslims , Writer of the article itself is in ambiguity who is unable to see difference between NRC and CAA.and he passed his verdict that CAA is unconstitutional while matter is pending with court. CAA and NRC both are clearly different things. NRC is applicable for all persons in Assam irrespective of religion where CAA is for granting citizenship of suffering minorities coming from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afganistan only three countries upto 31/12/2014. and not snatching citizenship of any Indian. Does writer think Muslim is minority in Pakistan or in Bangladesh or in Afganistan who is refugee in India? Acquiring Indian citizenship for foreigners including Muslims (section 6 of the citizenship Act) or Section 5 is still operational and it is not affected in any way by CAA. Writer of the article should see through lens of Welfare State of Indian constitution rather than communal lens for provoking or misguiding.
what kind of system is this… that give any tom dick and harry passport… people living in foreign countries are not handed passports… once you apply for passports you require to show certain documents how can passport which clearly states nationality = Indian is not enough… i lived in russia for one year.. did they gave me citizenship ?? what non sense.. is this.. people should stop giving votes to pakoda friers.
Suppose a muslim has been living in India for 50 years and he does not have any of the described documents by the government or he does not come under the enacted rules which will be later told by the government.What would happen to those?
50 saal se India me rehe raha documents nahi hai to ab Tak Kya bhajiya tal raha tha
I think tibbitian Nepalese and srilankakan migrants should learn Urdu nd then bribe bureaucrats they will claim refugee without documents from three countries….. Surely will get citizenship
Nepalese are legal migrants , indian and Nepalese can work in each other countries without restrictions as they have an agreement regarding this . For bhutan , you need to work permit and Tibetans are recognised as legal refugees by government . Srilanka na were also given indian citizenship
As many or more Hindus are migrating out than the saffron crowd is inviting the Hindu refugee. in. Ganges can handle 3 or 4 Kumbh mela at the same time if that is what the saffron crowd wants.
If you were an illegal immigrant, how could the date of entry into India be documented , since this was a secret entry across borders ? If one was a minority in say Afghanistan, why would their GOvt issue a certificate regarding one’s religion ? It doesn’t make sense. Finally if one was persecuted there, who would certify that ? WHy would a Govt indict itself ?
The author’s point is that most applicants for citizenship under CAA will not have even a single document that is theoretically required.
Agreed with the article, but we must also have the guts to demand that CAA include ALL genuine refugees… that is what India is asking. Do not use religion as a discriminator – do not trash our constitution.
Good analysis! This is only the second article by Shivam in which he does not come across as a juvenile twit. We have to await the notification of detailed rules under CAA. But the bigger picture is that it is imperative for India to document the list of citizens so that we can identify illegal immigrants going forward – otherwise, we have no country. Nobody will question the need to ensure that no legitimate citizen of India will lose her citizenship. But the fear of how well the government will do that job cannot prevent us from securing vital national interests. We have enough safeguards through our legal systems to everybody. The entire lefty mediawallahs and their political masters are guilty of fanning a disinformation campaign against CAA.
I agree with Shivam. We need to remove all arbitrariness in government, and not allow government employees to use any discretionary powers.
Of course, I also hope Shivam supports my advocacy on another issue: We should not allow government employees to use their discretion in hiring for the UPSC-based services. Here, I mean the use of group discussions and interviews to perform a holistic evaluation of candidates – basically a ruse to get in more minority and deprived candidates (this is how Shah Faesal and other J&K candidates are topping the civil services exams, by the way).
I think we all know which way Shivam will swing on this one!
clear minority baiting! what proof do you have to say ” basically a ruse to get in more minority and deprived candidates”?
Why shame in accepting country was divided on the basis of religion, Gandhiji himself allowed as per religion.
If they were against religion country division, they would have fought like abhrahm Lincoln fought war against slavery.
Lincon was a slave owner himself. And Gandhi never accepted that India was only for Hindus – that is why he was murdered by NRG. Nehru did not accept India as solely Hindu either and remember that HE was a Kashmiri Pandit. In any case, India is secular and if it does not remain so, it will not be India. So anyone saying India is only for Hindus is anti-India.
Where is this written that Gandhiji divided this county on the basis of religion
The law of unintended consequences: just as Muslims are told to go to Pakistan, now Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan will be told to go to India.
So dear Modiji has done a great disservice not only to Indian Muslims, but also to Hindus in neighboring countries.
Gade murdoan ko nahi khodna chaiye.