The private lender's shares tumbled to be top Nifty 50 loser after India's central bank barred it from taking on new customers through online and mobile banking channels.
Another addition to military cooperation has been the Strategic Space Dialogue, inaugurated in Paris in 2023. Last month, India participated as an observer to France’s AsterX.
This is a very ignorant article. Not only is it clearly biased and severely lacking in Economic understanding and insight, the author seems to be altogether uninterested in an answer to his own rhetorical question. What the author calls political will is actually a fear by the Centre of affecting the market adversely. MSPs harm consumers and make the market inefficient. It is indeed sad that the farmers are in this state, but the government has to address the cost issue rather than the price one. MSPs incentivize noncompetitive techniques, which will only harm the country in the future.
The government priorities should be towards the future, and bullet trains and other infrastructure projects are more important for long term growth.
The author himself is clearly biased, opinionated, boorish and ignorant. He is ignorant not only of basic economics, but also of his own ignorance. Now ask yourself a simple question: is this an attempt by the journalist to sincerely question the government’s actions? Probably not, I like to call it political will: something all journalists lacking rigor and talent employ to sway the opinions of those who have the same political opinions. I suggest everyone to skip this guys articles from now on, if this is the level of economic understanding present in them.
If there is drought farmer bear it, they lose money with nothing to sell. Now next year full crop so every farmer got full crop now everybody wants to sell result Selling Price less than cost price. Next year may be drought or flood. Cant Govt have cold storage and give them to farmers for free of rent so he can use it and sell when there is profit.
Silly whataboutism (bullet train,etc) coupled with a fact-free emotional argument for a proposal that will needlessly burden the exchequer with no long-term benefits
Lefties truly leave their brain before typing or opening their mouths.
A shut banking system would collapse the economy. Bullet train is funded by a Japanese soft loan. Why, why do we suffer these fools!
This is a very ignorant article. Not only is it clearly biased and severely lacking in Economic understanding and insight, the author seems to be altogether uninterested in an answer to his own rhetorical question. What the author calls political will is actually a fear by the Centre of affecting the market adversely. MSPs harm consumers and make the market inefficient. It is indeed sad that the farmers are in this state, but the government has to address the cost issue rather than the price one. MSPs incentivize noncompetitive techniques, which will only harm the country in the future.
The government priorities should be towards the future, and bullet trains and other infrastructure projects are more important for long term growth.
The author himself is clearly biased, opinionated, boorish and ignorant. He is ignorant not only of basic economics, but also of his own ignorance. Now ask yourself a simple question: is this an attempt by the journalist to sincerely question the government’s actions? Probably not, I like to call it political will: something all journalists lacking rigor and talent employ to sway the opinions of those who have the same political opinions. I suggest everyone to skip this guys articles from now on, if this is the level of economic understanding present in them.
If there is drought farmer bear it, they lose money with nothing to sell. Now next year full crop so every farmer got full crop now everybody wants to sell result Selling Price less than cost price. Next year may be drought or flood. Cant Govt have cold storage and give them to farmers for free of rent so he can use it and sell when there is profit.
Silly whataboutism (bullet train,etc) coupled with a fact-free emotional argument for a proposal that will needlessly burden the exchequer with no long-term benefits