Indian communists have come to regret many political blunders – from opposing Quit India to supporting Emergency. Saying no to anti-Modi alliance could be another.
The Indian planning system did not encourage individuals based on ‘what they knew’, but on ‘whom they knew’. Many left for countries that recognised their talent.
The new law, which the government has framed as a moral duty, forced major platforms like Dream11 & Zupee to shut operations, wiping out hundreds of crores in market capitalisation.
Joint Doctrine for Special Forces Operations, released Wednesday, also outlines plans for the future expansion of AFSOD and the creation of Joint Service Training Institutes.
Putin sees this as a victory. Europeans have decided to deal with Trump on his terms for the sake of the larger Western alliance. We look at the lessons for us in India.
Though I m not a CPI(M) supporter, I believe Prakash Karat did the right thing by not allying with the INC. For the CPI(M), INC and BJP are nearly the same as far as economic policies are concerned. Even in social cases, though INC projects itself as a secular to the Hindu nationalist approach of BJP, it is not truly secular. It follows an appeasement based secularism wherein a certain community or caste is favored at the cost of the other depending on the situation to create divisions over people and then ruling over it. This is way different from the atheist approach of true communism, which aims at keeping religion and caste away altogether. So, for CPI(M), aligning with INC for beating BJP away is like allying with a tiger to beat the lion. It can very well ally with BJP with same logic to keep INC away so as to protect India from casteist divisions. Moreover, backing INC would make CPI(M) weaker since it erodes the niche, however small, support it currently has.
The Communist Party of India,of any variety, is on a natural course of ending a political life. What difference whether one Karat or another Yechuri can make? Any hair splitting and plausible dialectics is an undue and even unfair attention bestowed
on a political ideology which the public has already forgotten.
Who got shaheed – it is warrior or patriots’ class and some mixed race of Subcontinent.
Who took reins of guardianship of Hindus – it is educating class or the stakeholders of Hinduism philosophy, rest crowd followed the educationists and policy makers of contemporary India (it is who set the curruculum, schemes and gave direction to all sets of disciplines).
Prakash karat is right for anti-congress stand becoz of opportunistic oscillation or psuedo approach of congress on issues of national importance purely on vote bank considerations.
This article is boosa.Yechuri is trying to sell what is left of CPM to Congress at a throwaway price,a Rajya Sabha seat for himself.Karat and his wife are trying to stop both plans.They have prevailed so far and the CPM is still alive.
Mr.ketkar , a congress sympathiser cum journalist, has been expecting a nomination on Rajyasabha for so many years. But, he never got anything. Still, this poor fellow has not given up hope. Here he is criticising communist to please his congress masters , hoping that if (at all) they come to power, they will nominate him on rajyasabha as representative
Though I m not a CPI(M) supporter, I believe Prakash Karat did the right thing by not allying with the INC. For the CPI(M), INC and BJP are nearly the same as far as economic policies are concerned. Even in social cases, though INC projects itself as a secular to the Hindu nationalist approach of BJP, it is not truly secular. It follows an appeasement based secularism wherein a certain community or caste is favored at the cost of the other depending on the situation to create divisions over people and then ruling over it. This is way different from the atheist approach of true communism, which aims at keeping religion and caste away altogether. So, for CPI(M), aligning with INC for beating BJP away is like allying with a tiger to beat the lion. It can very well ally with BJP with same logic to keep INC away so as to protect India from casteist divisions. Moreover, backing INC would make CPI(M) weaker since it erodes the niche, however small, support it currently has.
The Communist Party of India,of any variety, is on a natural course of ending a political life. What difference whether one Karat or another Yechuri can make? Any hair splitting and plausible dialectics is an undue and even unfair attention bestowed
on a political ideology which the public has already forgotten.
Who got shaheed – it is warrior or patriots’ class and some mixed race of Subcontinent.
Who took reins of guardianship of Hindus – it is educating class or the stakeholders of Hinduism philosophy, rest crowd followed the educationists and policy makers of contemporary India (it is who set the curruculum, schemes and gave direction to all sets of disciplines).
instigating for rulling class wah there must be a limitation.Historical blunder is a word of opportunist politicians.
Prakash karat is right for anti-congress stand becoz of opportunistic oscillation or psuedo approach of congress on issues of national importance purely on vote bank considerations.
Modi should encourage opposition leaders like Rahul Gandhi, Prakash Karat etc. His 2019 victory is guaranteed.
This article is boosa.Yechuri is trying to sell what is left of CPM to Congress at a throwaway price,a Rajya Sabha seat for himself.Karat and his wife are trying to stop both plans.They have prevailed so far and the CPM is still alive.
Mr.ketkar , a congress sympathiser cum journalist, has been expecting a nomination on Rajyasabha for so many years. But, he never got anything. Still, this poor fellow has not given up hope. Here he is criticising communist to please his congress masters , hoping that if (at all) they come to power, they will nominate him on rajyasabha as representative