The definition of rape in India is still looked at through the lens of a woman’s marital status. If you oppose criminalising marital rape, you are a rape apologist.
An array of issues will throw themselves open to the privacy test after the Supreme Court ruled the right to privacy as a fundamental right, experts said.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
A common thread runs through the memories of soldiers of the 1965 war—ingenuity, courage and camaraderie that withstood an apparently technologically superior foe.
Many really smart people now share the position that playing cricket with Pakistan is politically, strategically and morally wrong. It is just a poor appreciation of competitive sport.
There is no such thing as marital rape.Don’t get married in that case if you intend to deny your husband sex.First see all the laws which are biased against men before making such asinine assertions.This is the reason Indian judiciary is bogged down no thanks to these frivolous assertions.
India is the only country in the world who have 49+ gender biased law …..
According to data boys r more prone to sexual assault (52%)than girls , according to indian law male can’t be raped , can’t be molested best part is that even child caant be raped by women they r booked under pocso .
We live in a country where we want to control rape by allowing Women child rapist to hide their name & face .
more than 85% cases r fake & in 498A 98% cases r fake ….women file rape cases on bf & person to take revenge from women .
We already know in India boy r booked for rape if he breakup with girl girl can’t it means girls never do break up (gold digger ) …we all noe the women (bhabi ) r indulging in extra martial affairs in every cities of India but according to law , women caant be punished for this & this adultery is termed as women empowerment even in divorce men loose 4-5 year with great financial looses .
Feminist & some gold digger noe if women started lifted & prosecuted for sex on the pretext of marriage not a single educated girl of metro cities would be left .
For martial rape , feminist r saying law should not be discriminative just bcoz of its misuse .
Then y govt r so regressive in implementing Gender Neutral law .
Just like every developed countries who have gender neutral law .
At last during my whole life I observed that feminist r not only anti male but they r anti nationalist .
Only bcoz of Feminist & some male feminist too Delhi r considered as rape capital , most of the rape cases r fake ,
they never demand to punish false accuser (anti nationalist) .
They demand only gender biased law but say right to equality’ this time in India not a single law is in favour of men & they demand one more biased law , martial rape (anti men ) .
Untill govt don’t implement gender neutral law (especially rape & Dv ) nothing will be good .
How do two people dating prove that there was consent or not? Or two strangers, it could be a consentual one night stand.
Same as every other rape case. Rape cases are problematic. No one assumes or thinks that a person may have wanted to be robbed, or assaulted. But when sexual contact it is possible that a participant may have wanted it, or may have not. That rape cases are unlike any other crime isn’t any reason to throw up our hands and not address it.
We should formally define what rape is first to have a serious discussion around it. In my opinion violence may be the sole criterion rather than just the male organ getting inside a female organ. All confusion may go away with this definition. Rape defined through penetration somehow glorifies the male organ and at the same time vilify the female organ, as if everything is lost as far as she is concerned. I guess, some sort of patriarchal fantasy, nothing more.
A person could use the real or implied threat of violence to coerce a person into intercourse. That doesn’t mean there was consent just because violence did not happen.
There is no such thing as marital rape.Don’t get married in that case if you intend to deny your husband sex.First see all the laws which are biased against men before making such asinine assertions.This is the reason Indian judiciary is bogged down no thanks to these frivolous assertions.
India is the only country in the world who have 49+ gender biased law …..
According to data boys r more prone to sexual assault (52%)than girls , according to indian law male can’t be raped , can’t be molested best part is that even child caant be raped by women they r booked under pocso .
We live in a country where we want to control rape by allowing Women child rapist to hide their name & face .
more than 85% cases r fake & in 498A 98% cases r fake ….women file rape cases on bf & person to take revenge from women .
We already know in India boy r booked for rape if he breakup with girl girl can’t it means girls never do break up (gold digger ) …we all noe the women (bhabi ) r indulging in extra martial affairs in every cities of India but according to law , women caant be punished for this & this adultery is termed as women empowerment even in divorce men loose 4-5 year with great financial looses .
Feminist & some gold digger noe if women started lifted & prosecuted for sex on the pretext of marriage not a single educated girl of metro cities would be left .
For martial rape , feminist r saying law should not be discriminative just bcoz of its misuse .
Then y govt r so regressive in implementing Gender Neutral law .
Just like every developed countries who have gender neutral law .
At last during my whole life I observed that feminist r not only anti male but they r anti nationalist .
Only bcoz of Feminist & some male feminist too Delhi r considered as rape capital , most of the rape cases r fake ,
they never demand to punish false accuser (anti nationalist) .
They demand only gender biased law but say right to equality’ this time in India not a single law is in favour of men & they demand one more biased law , martial rape (anti men ) .
Untill govt don’t implement gender neutral law (especially rape & Dv ) nothing will be good .
curious to know from supporters of separate #maritalrape law (despite having a bomb 498a)..how you want a accused husband to prove consent ?
How does a wife prove she didn’t consent?
How do two people dating prove that there was consent or not? Or two strangers, it could be a consentual one night stand.
Same as every other rape case. Rape cases are problematic. No one assumes or thinks that a person may have wanted to be robbed, or assaulted. But when sexual contact it is possible that a participant may have wanted it, or may have not. That rape cases are unlike any other crime isn’t any reason to throw up our hands and not address it.
We should formally define what rape is first to have a serious discussion around it. In my opinion violence may be the sole criterion rather than just the male organ getting inside a female organ. All confusion may go away with this definition. Rape defined through penetration somehow glorifies the male organ and at the same time vilify the female organ, as if everything is lost as far as she is concerned. I guess, some sort of patriarchal fantasy, nothing more.
A person could use the real or implied threat of violence to coerce a person into intercourse. That doesn’t mean there was consent just because violence did not happen.