What explains the Gita's resurgence in political sphere? Concerted attempt to push it for political mobilisation, or is it organic? A look at its political career in modern Indian history.
BJP leader says Kangana Ranaut should ‘avoid speaking on every subject'. 'Her statements embarrass the party,' says former Punjab minister Manoranjan Kalia.
Unlike the Mahatma, Tamil Nadu's textiles minister R Gandhi has courted his fair share of political controversies & graft allegations like misappropriation of about Rs 60 crore.
The official website of the Olympics confirms that no Indian cyclist competed in the cycling events in Berlin in 1936, while no Olympic games were held in 1942.
Other key promises in the budget include AI- and other technology-enabled services for farmers and continuation of the Ladki Bahin Yojana, which will have the same outlay.
IRIS Lavan was in the region for the International Fleet Review held last month and ‘sought urgent docking in Kochi citing technical issues,’ it is learnt.
The Pakistani political leadership is weak and devoid of any intellect. Its diplomacy is entirely India-China-US focused and suffers from a presumptive view of Afghanistan as a vassal.
Ambedkar , founder of Constitution says” Gita is not a book of religion, nor a treatise on philosophy. what it does is to defend certain dogmas of religion on philosophical ground.” The dogma was that of chaturvarna ( caste system). Ambedkar asks a pertinent question : why does Krisna make performance of varna duty-though void of merit-a necessary condition for salvation? why isnt loving devotion to Krishna enough?
There is no conflict here: All that Gita says is the steadfast adherence to duty (dharma) with dedication and surrender of its fruits to the almighty is one’s responsibility.
What one’s duty, who is the authority to prescribe one’s duty, as per the situation, social context and organization of society is debatable. Whether its shastras & vedas, parents, gurus, leaders or government is the question.
However once duty and the authority is clear, for an ordinary person, at a personal level, the message of Gita gives energy to execute it, solace & comfort if it is not fruitful and confers grace & humility if successful.
Ambedkar , founder of Constitution says” Gita is not a book of religion, nor a treatise on philosophy. what it does is to defend certain dogmas of religion on philosophical ground.” The dogma was that of chaturvarna ( caste system). Ambedkar asks a pertinent question : why does Krisna make performance of varna duty-though void of merit-a necessary condition for salvation? why isnt loving devotion to Krishna enough?
There is no conflict here: All that Gita says is the steadfast adherence to duty (dharma) with dedication and surrender of its fruits to the almighty is one’s responsibility.
What one’s duty, who is the authority to prescribe one’s duty, as per the situation, social context and organization of society is debatable. Whether its shastras & vedas, parents, gurus, leaders or government is the question.
However once duty and the authority is clear, for an ordinary person, at a personal level, the message of Gita gives energy to execute it, solace & comfort if it is not fruitful and confers grace & humility if successful.
So its essentially free therapy.