What explains the Gita's resurgence in political sphere? Concerted attempt to push it for political mobilisation, or is it organic? A look at its political career in modern Indian history.
Lawrence Wong along with his wife Loo Tze Lui, laid a wreath at the Gandhi Smriti. Wong is on a 3-day state visit to the country, during which he will hold a bilateral meeting with PM Modi.
Pandit Ashok Sharma, a leader of the Mahasabha and founder of Nana Apte Dham, led the event, demanded that the government revoke Mahatma Gandhi’s title of 'Father of the Nation'.
BJP leader says Kangana Ranaut should ‘avoid speaking on every subject'. 'Her statements embarrass the party,' says former Punjab minister Manoranjan Kalia.
The dogs will survive whatever orders are passed. But institutions are more fragile than we imagine. Once lost, the trust they embody takes generations to rebuild.
With bad loans shrinking & capital buffers stronger, urban co-op banks’ new umbrella body NUCFDC is now prioritising rollout of digital transformation.
If deal goes through, Greece will be 2nd foreign country to procure vehicle. Morocco was first; TATA Group has set up manufacturing unit there with minimum 30 percent indigenous content.
Many of you might think I got something so wrong in National Interest pieces written this year. I might disagree! But some deserve a Mea Culpa. I’d deal with the most recent this week.
Ambedkar , founder of Constitution says” Gita is not a book of religion, nor a treatise on philosophy. what it does is to defend certain dogmas of religion on philosophical ground.” The dogma was that of chaturvarna ( caste system). Ambedkar asks a pertinent question : why does Krisna make performance of varna duty-though void of merit-a necessary condition for salvation? why isnt loving devotion to Krishna enough?
There is no conflict here: All that Gita says is the steadfast adherence to duty (dharma) with dedication and surrender of its fruits to the almighty is one’s responsibility.
What one’s duty, who is the authority to prescribe one’s duty, as per the situation, social context and organization of society is debatable. Whether its shastras & vedas, parents, gurus, leaders or government is the question.
However once duty and the authority is clear, for an ordinary person, at a personal level, the message of Gita gives energy to execute it, solace & comfort if it is not fruitful and confers grace & humility if successful.
Ambedkar , founder of Constitution says” Gita is not a book of religion, nor a treatise on philosophy. what it does is to defend certain dogmas of religion on philosophical ground.” The dogma was that of chaturvarna ( caste system). Ambedkar asks a pertinent question : why does Krisna make performance of varna duty-though void of merit-a necessary condition for salvation? why isnt loving devotion to Krishna enough?
There is no conflict here: All that Gita says is the steadfast adherence to duty (dharma) with dedication and surrender of its fruits to the almighty is one’s responsibility.
What one’s duty, who is the authority to prescribe one’s duty, as per the situation, social context and organization of society is debatable. Whether its shastras & vedas, parents, gurus, leaders or government is the question.
However once duty and the authority is clear, for an ordinary person, at a personal level, the message of Gita gives energy to execute it, solace & comfort if it is not fruitful and confers grace & humility if successful.
So its essentially free therapy.