'Vidhayak putra' Aklavya Singh Gaur also wants all Muslim traders to vacate rented shops in the next 2 months. The trigger for this direction seems to be a recent ‘love jihad’ case.
3-day programme comes weeks after Madhya Pradesh minister Vijay Shah made controversial remark about Colonel Sofiya Qureshi. Speakers included senior leaders like Amit Shah & Rajnath Singh.
Bench of Justices Surya Kant & N. Kotiswar Singh stayed BJP leader’s arrest, but rebuked him for ‘filthy, crass’ comments & ‘insincere’ public apology.
According to party insiders, the leadership feels row may die down soon but removing him will give ammo to Oppn while country is 'celebrating Modi govt's befitting reply to Pakistan'.
Chintamani Malviya has criticised BJP govt's decision to permanently acquire farmers' land for Ujjain Simhastha, previously acquired temporarily for 3-6 months for the religious fair.
Releasing Export Preparedness Index report, NITI Aayog CEO says Centre has ‘ticked a lot of boxes’, & responsibility of driving the next phase of export growth now rests with states.
The proposed project costing about Rs 3.25 lakh crore will entail procurement of 18 aircraft in fly away condition & the rest made in India with up to 60% indigenous content.
UK, EFTA already in the bag and EU on the way, many members of RCEP except China signed up, and even restrictions on China being lifted, India has changed its mind on trade.
The Print is so selective in it’s reporting. Despite a grossly biased and partisan reportage, it lays claim to unhyphenated journalism.
It has reported this incident because a Hindu is at fault while Muslims are the supposed victims.
Had it been the other way round, would The Print have reported it?
As an example, just the other day, in Govandi area of Mumbai, a Durga idol being carried to the pandal by the faithful was attacked by Muslims near a mosque and broken into pieces. Did The Print report that story? It could have, but it chose not to.
The Print is so selective in it’s reporting. Despite a grossly biased and partisan reportage, it lays claim to unhyphenated journalism.
It has reported this incident because a Hindu is at fault while Muslims are the supposed victims.
Had it been the other way round, would The Print have reported it?
As an example, just the other day, in Govandi area of Mumbai, a Durga idol being carried to the pandal by the faithful was attacked by Muslims near a mosque and broken into pieces. Did The Print report that story? It could have, but it chose not to.