'Vidhayak putra' Aklavya Singh Gaur also wants all Muslim traders to vacate rented shops in the next 2 months. The trigger for this direction seems to be a recent ‘love jihad’ case.
3-day programme comes weeks after Madhya Pradesh minister Vijay Shah made controversial remark about Colonel Sofiya Qureshi. Speakers included senior leaders like Amit Shah & Rajnath Singh.
Bench of Justices Surya Kant & N. Kotiswar Singh stayed BJP leader’s arrest, but rebuked him for ‘filthy, crass’ comments & ‘insincere’ public apology.
According to party insiders, the leadership feels row may die down soon but removing him will give ammo to Oppn while country is 'celebrating Modi govt's befitting reply to Pakistan'.
Chintamani Malviya has criticised BJP govt's decision to permanently acquire farmers' land for Ujjain Simhastha, previously acquired temporarily for 3-6 months for the religious fair.
Israel sees Iran as an existential threat. But the US, Turkey & Gulf states fear refugee flows or attacks on oil sites. These countries need a stable end-state for the whole region over more strikes.
As per the timeline decided, 5 prototypes of India’s own fifth-generation fighter are set to be rolled out by 2031, with the first by 2028 using the GE 414 engine.
The key to fighting a war successfully, or even launching it, is a clear objective. That’s an entirely political call. It isn’t emotional or purely military.
The Print is so selective in it’s reporting. Despite a grossly biased and partisan reportage, it lays claim to unhyphenated journalism.
It has reported this incident because a Hindu is at fault while Muslims are the supposed victims.
Had it been the other way round, would The Print have reported it?
As an example, just the other day, in Govandi area of Mumbai, a Durga idol being carried to the pandal by the faithful was attacked by Muslims near a mosque and broken into pieces. Did The Print report that story? It could have, but it chose not to.
The Print is so selective in it’s reporting. Despite a grossly biased and partisan reportage, it lays claim to unhyphenated journalism.
It has reported this incident because a Hindu is at fault while Muslims are the supposed victims.
Had it been the other way round, would The Print have reported it?
As an example, just the other day, in Govandi area of Mumbai, a Durga idol being carried to the pandal by the faithful was attacked by Muslims near a mosque and broken into pieces. Did The Print report that story? It could have, but it chose not to.