Speaking to ThePrint’s National and Strategic Affairs Editor Jyoti Malhotra, former ambassador Ranjit Rae says Oli has been able to ‘whip up anti-India sentiment’ to consolidate his position in Nepal Communist Party.
After receiving support from the opposition Nepali Congress, K.P. Sharma Oli’s govt has moved an amendment to reflect its new map in the national emblem.
Nepal Foreign Minister Pradeep Gyawali said at a parliamentary committee they’re in constant touch with India as ‘we want to resolve the issue through diplomatic means’.
Border trade between the countries resumed in 1992 after remaining suspended for decades after the 1962 India-China War and takes place between June-October every year.
On 15 May, General Naravane had suggested that Nepal might be raising the issue of road construction via Lipulekh to Mansarovar at 'behest of someone else'.
On the first episode of Two Much With Kajol and Twinkle, Aamir Khan and Salman Khan were confronted with another hypocrisy: age gaps. And they didn't come out looking good.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While the IAF remains committed to the Tejas programme and has placed orders for 180 Tejas Mk1A, the force is eagerly waiting for the Tejas Mk 2 version.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
1. After the Sugauli treaty both sides decided the border, And a map of Nepal and India was produced by East India Company which both side signed.
2. Later in 1857 new map appeared, who made it? We dont know because when you change border both side need to agree, Since there is no proof that there was consultation between British raj and Nepal, this new map is illegal. So, As far as Nepal is concerned map of 1816 is official and valid.
3. The new map whoever produced it, is not signed by Nepal, was not informed by British raj to Nepal.
4. There are many other maps which show Lipmpuyadhura stream is the origin of kali river.
5. This truth so absolute that even India when producing new map in November 2, 2020 made a honest mistake showing Limpuyadhura stream as kali river. But after a week they changed.
6. Among three streams originating from that area, other two are smaller, it is international recognized/accepted norm that bigger stream is always the main one. Hence the Limpuyadhura which Nepal is claiming, which was agreed with East India company is the origin of kali tiver.
7. I have heard many Indian saying “oh that is strategically important to India, we can not get out of there.” India has to understand because it is strategically important, they can’t grab neighbors land. So keeping good relation with Nepal is not strategically important to India?
8. Some Indians even go farther and say “well, India has military presence there since 1962, so it belongs to India.” This logic is hilarious Pakistan has occupied part of Kashmir since 1947, it should be theirs then. Also as per India, China has occupied many Indian territory why India is claiming it then?
9. There was no war between India and Nepal when India occupied that area because we didn’t have Army and we thought we can bring back that part by talk.
10. India is a new country it seems it does not know how to behave with its friendly neighbor. On the other hand being oldest country in South Asia Nepal is dealing very maturely with every neighbor.
11. Because of these obvious reason Nepal has to produce its political based on treaty she signed not on sets of imaginations.
12. It is better for India if she stops imagining Chinese ghost on every legitimate move Nepal makes
1. After the Sugauli treaty both sides decided the border, And a map of Nepal and India was produced by East India Company which both side signed.
2. Later in 1857 new map appeared, who made it? We dont know because when you change border both side need to agree, Since there is no proof that there was consultation between British raj and Nepal, this new map is illegal. So, As far as Nepal is concerned map of 1816 is official and valid.
3. The new map whoever produced it, is not signed by Nepal, was not informed by British raj to Nepal.
4. There are many other maps which show Lipmpuyadhura stream is the origin of kali river.
5. This truth so absolute that even India when producing new map in November 2, 2020 made a honest mistake showing Limpuyadhura stream as kali river. But after a week they changed.
6. Among three streams originating from that area, other two are smaller, it is international recognized/accepted norm that bigger stream is always the main one. Hence the Limpuyadhura which Nepal is claiming, which was agreed with East India company is the origin of kali tiver.
7. I have heard many Indian saying “oh that is strategically important to India, we can not get out of there.” India has to understand because it is strategically important, they can’t grab neighbors land. So keeping good relation with Nepal is not strategically important to India?
8. Some Indians even go farther and say “well, India has military presence there since 1962, so it belongs to India.” This logic is hilarious Pakistan has occupied part of Kashmir since 1947, it should be theirs then. Also as per India, China has occupied many Indian territory why India is claiming it then?
9. There was no war between India and Nepal when India occupied that area because we didn’t have Army and we thought we can bring back that part by talk.
10. India is a new country it seems it does not know how to behave with its friendly neighbor. On the other hand being oldest country in South Asia Nepal is dealing very maturely with every neighbor.
11. Because of these obvious reason Nepal has to produce its political based on treaty she signed not on sets of imaginations.
12. It is better for India if she stops imagining Chinese ghost on every legitimate move Nepal makes