Shatrughan Sinha, who joined Congress last week, says BJP now an autocratic party and he prefers the 'better party... one of Nehru-Gandhis, Patel and Manmohan'.
A bench headed by CJI Rajan Gogoi rejected RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav's bail plea a day after the CBI strongly opposed it claiming he would conduct political activities.
The symbolism of Yadav chieftains bending before Mayawati could alter the future of politics in UP and Bihar.
The image of Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD)...
Tej Pratap had earlier approached a civil court with a divorce petition which was declined due to technical reasons following which he moved a fresh application.
The conventional wisdom is that if a govt fails to improve the lot of the voters, it is punished. Kumar presided over an economic disaster for 20 years and was re-elected by a landslide.
Indian govt officials last month skipped Turkish National Day celebrations in Delhi, in a message to Ankara following its support for Islamabad, particularly during Operation Sindoor.
Bihar is blessed with a land more fertile for revolutions than any in India. Why has it fallen so far behind then? Constant obsession with politics is at the root of its destruction.
Akhilesh JI can manage somehow but Lalu JI must be given full security because he has so much danger inside jail from goonda people staying in jail. Lalu JI and his sons are only hope for Bihari people so modi must give full security to Lalu JI.
There are bunch of people who lost security cover, both from and outside BJP but by headlining Akhilesh and Lalu, the article seems to be suggesting a political vendetta rather than a standard process of government doing its job.
Akhilesh JI can manage somehow but Lalu JI must be given full security because he has so much danger inside jail from goonda people staying in jail. Lalu JI and his sons are only hope for Bihari people so modi must give full security to Lalu JI.
There are bunch of people who lost security cover, both from and outside BJP but by headlining Akhilesh and Lalu, the article seems to be suggesting a political vendetta rather than a standard process of government doing its job.
Should you be publishing the names or relationship of people whose security cover is being removed?