Under this model, battery is provided to EV owners on a subscription basis or lease. With more people open to buying EV cars, the lower upfront cost could likely drive wider acceptance.
The armoured platform is India's first amphibious infantry combat wheeled vehicle. Last year, the Royal Moroccan Armed Forces had procured 90 military trucks from the Tata Group.
How come Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey and Sri Lanka remain constitutional, democratic and stable despite Islam and Buddhism respectively, but Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar don’t?
The mindset of this Brahman Modi media is pathetic…. he either doesn’t possess knowledge about the kurmi caste or he is just too jealous…. kurmis are over 10% in Bihar if we include thé EBC subcaste of kurmi i.e dhanukh or mandal.
And koeri is easily 8% so this is the base vote bank of JDU and Nitish kumar. And as far as favourism is concerned he has done even 10% for his caste of what other sawarn CMs did in their period
Actually the author is partly right about the low population of kurmis , kurmi population is indeed low but more like 3%-4%. Dhanuks are not kurmis , it’s just because the population of kurmi is quite low, some folks have tried to include dhanuks within kurmi fold to bolster their numbers. It’s like the case of bhumihars who call themselves brahmins but the brahmins don’t really consider them as their own .
And i thought that Mandal is just a surname, it’s used by many castes including Ahirs/Yadavs. B.P Mandal of Mandal commission was an Ahir/Yadav.
Castiest Mishra just trying to defame an OBC leader. Can you not see dominance of so called upper caste in Bihar, just trying to mislead people
We didn’t thought such wrong data from your side.
Next time we careful about Nitish Kumar, who have no black spot at their image.
Ban such journalist who give wrong data for the profit of their own Aaka political.
Vikas Gangwar
Mishra Shame On You ,Brahmin Terrorist.
Kurmis and Yadavs are politically against each other ,but we both are OBC’s ,So Whenever a Brahmin Like you try to tarnish backward caste leaders image
Mishraji (author) got his facts all wrong. But if researches about brahmin in bihar they are about 4% and key post even now. Article is written from a political malicious biased narrative.
The print first of all correct your fact that kurmis are near about 6℅ in bihar and nitish kumar is not caste favouring goon . And your report is intentionally biased to target
Assembly poll , you have no agenda on development whatever nitish have done in a state like bihar can’t be comparable . Don’t be so panic nitish is going forward with bihar to take oath for fourth term cm in 2020
What a biased story!! What can anyone expect from general caste dominant media and that too brahmins. It’s clearly showing in this report. That’s the reason why Yadav goons are good in balancing the terms with them.
Such a biased reporting can be in the gene of only brahmins. From where he got the figure of Kurmis being only 2% instead of 10% plus of Bihar’s population? Why does not he demands caste based census which will show him the real ficture that it is the Brahmins who are 2% now instead of even 3%.
Such an awful writing. The writer is ridden with political sickness. He has deliberately missed out the actual IAS and IPS officers Nitish brought in and has always preferred and caste isn’t a factor in their promotions.
This article is prejudice, shows the amount of cliché and xenophobia The Print carries for Bihar and how critical they are about upliftment of lower castes. The Print is terrible and pathetic.
Looks like someone is feeling that Brahmins who are roughly at 5% of the population of India but occupy 50% of the most influential posts are not happy about the rise of OBCs, SCs and STs. Such selective and misleading post by ThePrint is shameful.
The mindset of this Brahman Modi media is pathetic…. he either doesn’t possess knowledge about the kurmi caste or he is just too jealous…. kurmis are over 10% in Bihar if we include thé EBC subcaste of kurmi i.e dhanukh or mandal.
And koeri is easily 8% so this is the base vote bank of JDU and Nitish kumar. And as far as favourism is concerned he has done even 10% for his caste of what other sawarn CMs did in their period
Actually the author is partly right about the low population of kurmis , kurmi population is indeed low but more like 3%-4%. Dhanuks are not kurmis , it’s just because the population of kurmi is quite low, some folks have tried to include dhanuks within kurmi fold to bolster their numbers. It’s like the case of bhumihars who call themselves brahmins but the brahmins don’t really consider them as their own .
And i thought that Mandal is just a surname, it’s used by many castes including Ahirs/Yadavs. B.P Mandal of Mandal commission was an Ahir/Yadav.
Castiest Mishra just trying to defame an OBC leader. Can you not see dominance of so called upper caste in Bihar, just trying to mislead people
Just jealous to uplift of backward caste and Easily ignored domination of so called upper caste in Bihar
The Print
We didn’t thought such wrong data from your side.
Next time we careful about Nitish Kumar, who have no black spot at their image.
Ban such journalist who give wrong data for the profit of their own Aaka political.
Vikas Gangwar
Mishra Shame On You ,Brahmin Terrorist.
Kurmis and Yadavs are politically against each other ,but we both are OBC’s ,So Whenever a Brahmin Like you try to tarnish backward caste leaders image
किसने जनगणना की है कि कुर्मी की जनसंख्या दो प्रतिशत है ? चुनाव देखते ही बकवास शुरू।दिमागी खुन्नस के शिकार मिश्रा जी
Such a wastage of time to read your article.. Get some life Mishra ji..
Mishraji (author) got his facts all wrong. But if researches about brahmin in bihar they are about 4% and key post even now. Article is written from a political malicious biased narrative.
Don’t be so panic nitish will finish 2020 also.
The print first of all correct your fact that kurmis are near about 6℅ in bihar and nitish kumar is not caste favouring goon . And your report is intentionally biased to target
Assembly poll , you have no agenda on development whatever nitish have done in a state like bihar can’t be comparable . Don’t be so panic nitish is going forward with bihar to take oath for fourth term cm in 2020
Weather knowingly or unknowingly keeping Satish kumar ( then an M.L.A. from Ashthawan) away from even one mention in the description is astounding.
Totally biased upper caste perceptions.
They will not talk about Brahmin Terrorism.
Jealous of Backwards upliftment.
What a biased story!! What can anyone expect from general caste dominant media and that too brahmins. It’s clearly showing in this report. That’s the reason why Yadav goons are good in balancing the terms with them.
A blatant attempt to tarnish Nitish Kumar’s image, just before election.
Such a biased reporting can be in the gene of only brahmins. From where he got the figure of Kurmis being only 2% instead of 10% plus of Bihar’s population? Why does not he demands caste based census which will show him the real ficture that it is the Brahmins who are 2% now instead of even 3%.
Highly baised article….writer will nvr tell abt brahminwad across country
Very biased reporting.
Such an awful writing. The writer is ridden with political sickness. He has deliberately missed out the actual IAS and IPS officers Nitish brought in and has always preferred and caste isn’t a factor in their promotions.
IAS : Deepak Kumar, Anjani Kumar, Sanjay Kumar, Pratyay Amrit, Anand Kishore and Sanjay Agarwal
IPS : Manu Maharaj and Garima Kumar
This article is prejudice, shows the amount of cliché and xenophobia The Print carries for Bihar and how critical they are about upliftment of lower castes. The Print is terrible and pathetic.
Looks like someone is feeling that Brahmins who are roughly at 5% of the population of India but occupy 50% of the most influential posts are not happy about the rise of OBCs, SCs and STs. Such selective and misleading post by ThePrint is shameful.