Complaint to HC chief justice says judges and collectors of 8 districts were asked to arrange tour for Justice Biswanath Rath’s brother, who has labelled it an ‘attempt to defame’.
Indian judiciary has a corrosive imbalance between the bar and the bench. Those who supervise the district judiciary do so without the lived experience that is essential for meaningful reform.
With the US-India trade deal yet to get done, rupee depreciation may be helping to mitigate India’s loss of competitiveness. The other problem is extreme despondence among overseas equity investors.
Of the total package, $649 million will be utilised for additional hardware, software, and support services, and the remaining for Major Defence Equipment (MDE).
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
As judges r dealing with several sensitive cases for which their family members should be protected during their journey to outside for security and other reasons . providing accommodation to family members of a judge is routine protocol there is no abnormality in this regard . As on 12th & 13th june 2019 the brother of judge travelled through a route which is mao infected areas for which HC protocol rightly informed the collectors and other officers to provide necessary assistance. Dragging a judge in to such a petty matter shows the ulterior motive of the complainant who used to make such complainant against the different judges at different time for which it’s high time the honorable highcourt sould enquire in to conduct of the Complainant. It is utmost duty of every citzen to preserve protect and respect the image of the judges so also courts. As family members president, governor, prime minister and other constitutional authorities of India are getting protocol coverage why their is exception for judges ? As pointed out by the complainant.
As judges r dealing with several sensitive cases for which their family members should be protected during their journey to outside for security and other reasons . providing accommodation to family members of a judge is routine protocol there is no abnormality in this regard . As on 12th & 13th june 2019 the brother of judge travelled through a route which is mao infected areas for which HC protocol rightly informed the collectors and other officers to provide necessary assistance. Dragging a judge in to such a petty matter shows the ulterior motive of the complainant who used to make such complainant against the different judges at different time for which it’s high time the honorable highcourt sould enquire in to conduct of the Complainant. It is utmost duty of every citzen to preserve protect and respect the image of the judges so also courts. As family members president, governor, prime minister and other constitutional authorities of India are getting protocol coverage why their is exception for judges ? As pointed out by the complainant.