Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh of the Allahabad High Court recently ruled that a woman who was sexually assaulted 'invited trouble' by drinking alcohol with the accused.
A resolution adopted by AICC says that accountability, without compromising judicial independence, is the need of the hour. The party stands committed to the idea of INDIA bloc.
Top court says no demolition without a 15-day prior notice, which should detail the nature of unauthorised construction; it also said high-handedness of officers won't be tolerated.
In his 1st statement, the 51st chief justice outlined a citizen-centric agenda for judicial reforms, highlighting many challenges that plague the judiciary, including backlog.
National Judicial Data Grid data identifies reasons for delay in nearly 2 cr criminal & civil cases pending before India's district judiciary. Of these, about 1.51 cr are criminal.
The book, ‘Supreme Court and the Indian Economy’, examines the impact of six Supreme Court judgements on economic policy, privatisation, and environmental regulations.
Kavitha, who is the daughter of former Telangana chief minister K Chandrashekar Rao, was arrested by the CBI while she was in judicial custody in the ED case.
The BJP often names him as the architect of India’s many shortcomings and failures, which are amplified on TV news. However, this week, Nehru’s words echoed across television after two very different victories.
On 4 November 2025, NCLAT bench, comprising Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Member Arun Baroka, noted that WhatsApp and Meta are distinct legal entities.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
Classic media has twisted the news in such a way that it seems that the court acquitted the accused in the 11 yr old girl case. But the judge said to try them in aggravated sexual assault. The law is similar in other parts of the world where attempts to has to be proved both by intention and preparation beyond initiation stage, otherwise it becomes case of sexual assault. However, in india femi mob can coerce the court to change order.
Indian women they want marital rape to be illegal like westerner countries but want harsh punishment like middle east countries where marital rape is not illegal. Even there death is hiven only for rape and murder. The prison sentences usually start from 8 years. Also in those countries a false complaint is punishable by several years in jail. They want the best of all worlds. Moreover in india we have special provision of rape in promise of marriage which is not present anywhere. Moreover, the mandatory minimum sentencing in india for rape is the severest among many parts of the world which has led to more victims being killed after rape after the nirbhaya incident. Moreover the higher the punishment, the more burden of proof it requires which has led to reduced convictions
The courts can decide whether the alleged rape happened or not. My bigger worry is — did the woman share the bill for the drinks, food, and the taxi fare when she went to the guy’s place, in this case the alleged rapist?
Because every penny is earned with hard work. If the woman didn’t split the bill on that date, that also needs to be discussed. It should be looked at as a kind of financial rape
This was a brilliant and impactful read. I’d love to see an even deeper dive into this subject from you. There’s so much more to unpack, and your voice is powerful enough to carry it. Please consider writing a more detailed follow-up.
Ms. Kaur would never write on the riots scorching Bengal. On the murderous mobs of Muslims terrorising Hindus in Murshidabad and Malda.
Nor would she speak up on behalf of the hundreds of Hindu women who were violated by the Muslim mobs in Bengal.
Classic media has twisted the news in such a way that it seems that the court acquitted the accused in the 11 yr old girl case. But the judge said to try them in aggravated sexual assault. The law is similar in other parts of the world where attempts to has to be proved both by intention and preparation beyond initiation stage, otherwise it becomes case of sexual assault. However, in india femi mob can coerce the court to change order.
Indian women they want marital rape to be illegal like westerner countries but want harsh punishment like middle east countries where marital rape is not illegal. Even there death is hiven only for rape and murder. The prison sentences usually start from 8 years. Also in those countries a false complaint is punishable by several years in jail. They want the best of all worlds. Moreover in india we have special provision of rape in promise of marriage which is not present anywhere. Moreover, the mandatory minimum sentencing in india for rape is the severest among many parts of the world which has led to more victims being killed after rape after the nirbhaya incident. Moreover the higher the punishment, the more burden of proof it requires which has led to reduced convictions
The courts can decide whether the alleged rape happened or not. My bigger worry is — did the woman share the bill for the drinks, food, and the taxi fare when she went to the guy’s place, in this case the alleged rapist?
Because every penny is earned with hard work. If the woman didn’t split the bill on that date, that also needs to be discussed. It should be looked at as a kind of financial rape
This was a brilliant and impactful read. I’d love to see an even deeper dive into this subject from you. There’s so much more to unpack, and your voice is powerful enough to carry it. Please consider writing a more detailed follow-up.
Ms. Kaur would never write on the riots scorching Bengal. On the murderous mobs of Muslims terrorising Hindus in Murshidabad and Malda.
Nor would she speak up on behalf of the hundreds of Hindu women who were violated by the Muslim mobs in Bengal.