Everybody has a piece of advice when it comes to finding a suitable boy. Because, clearly, a woman just doesn’t have it in her to take the right decision.
Going through their Instagrams and dissecting their ‘statements’ is not the astute political commentary you think it is—it is time for us to back off from targeting 20-year-olds.
Companies are borrowing more from banks and public. Economists say high capacity utilisation & growing new orders could set stage for renewed investment push by India Inc.
New Delhi has, in past, too, objected to Chinese construction activities in Shaksgam Valley. Work in this strategic region gathered pace after the 2017 Doklam stand-off.
A theme has not yet emerged for BJP & people see lack of a contest, which makes it unexciting. For all these reasons, 2024 is turning out to be an unexpectedly theme-less election.
Rhea was involved in drug cartel since 2017 – a long time much before she started dating SSR – the accessed drug chats date back to 2017 – SSR was in relationship with Ankita Lokhande back then. In 2017 for whom had she been procuring these stuff The Print – can u please elaborate on this in your blind article – the way other media houses are targeting her passing their own judgement – in the same way I can see your article too is giving a lame conclusion – SSR wasn’t the right choice for Rhea ? Are you also not following the same footsteps as the other mainstream media giving your own verdict ? ? ? Ok I agree to your article stated facts – but does in pure love does a partner push their loved ones towards such a sinister path- encourage him to get deeply involved into it knowing it very well that it would gradually destroy him OR try her level best to bring him back to the right track – Rhea might be taking him to the doctor’s but on other hand she kept on providing him those drugs if her claims are to be believed? Then what’s the purpose to take him to the doctor? all in vain ? Stop practising one- sided journalism through such rubbish articles.
I don’t believe that posting such article is going to change the real truth behind all this fuss.This matter is not about “feminism” someone’s life has been taken away and all we are doing is supporting someone who took advantage of her innocent boyfriend.We all know that she took drugs and even gave it to her boyfriend knowing the fact that she is not supposed to do so legally or morally.Instead of helping him out of the situation by either informing his parents about it or by helping him out by herself through medications or through other things she gave a damn and gave him drugs in an inappropriate amount.She even restricted him from communicating with his family.She totally isolated him from the world.HOW IS THAT NOT WRONG?Talking about NIRBHAYA CASE YES OF COURSE THE RAPIST HAD TO DIE WHETHER OR NOT HIS WIFE PLEADED OR BEGGED FOR HER HUSBAND’S LIFE.Someone’s life has been taken away and we all are wasting our time in debating about unnecessary issues.Instead of catching the real culprit we all are bringing up these issues which are totally not related to this matter.Even I am a girl and I know how narrow minded out society is.I know how women are blamed for everything but this matter has nothing to do with it.
Seriously? You just choose to ignore that she had been a part of a drug raket for a very long time?
DEALING IN DRUGS IS A CRIME, NO MATTER WHAT EXCUSE YOU GIVE OR FOR WHOMSOEVER YOU ARE DOING IT OR EVEN IF YOU ARE DOING IT FOR THE SAKE OF “LOVE”.
So Ms. Jyoti, is it wrong to expect some one to take right decision, how many wrong decision did she not make, ok tell me one right decision from rhea,rather giving paid article why can’t you try and think. I won’t say she selected wrong guy, but when she says he was depressed,she fulfilled his wishes for drug’s, that too in huge qty, she needed common sense only for that to do right thing. Why not inform Family on the seriousness, why did not she give medical file, and when he had panic attack why leave suddenly? Why not call anyone at his home or flat mates when she got news?? what stopped her. Why accusing only SSR for drug’s when clearly she also took it, it’s Sad that just coz someone is not alive you put all blame on him. Clearly she did not make wise decision, distanced family and friends..let her prove it otherwise. Stop this fake FEMENISM, if she is in jail that is due to her involvement and solid proof.
Like an ‘adarniya abala nari’, she procured banned substances for her man. This was a grown up woman making her own free choice. And then, when caught in her own web, she turned around and cried ‘smash patriarchy’. Bravo!
Well written article.. all true about the society. Imagine an ex girlfriend ankita asking on social media, should rhea who loved sushant have allowed him to smoke marijuana? Procured it for sushant ? She is so wrong for it jail her!
It’s cringeworthy ! Ankita has no education on depression or marijuana legal in 36 countries for medical reasons. That jibe. Taking india back to stone age.
Rhea is innocent and this girl we pray is unbroken from this psycho witchhunt on her. Love and power to rhe
Absolutely. We all are responsible for the society.We should do our part to give a better message not to argue to proof ourself right
To understand patriarchy you have to understand feudal mindset. In feudal set up men rigorously works in the field whole days and dies in the battlefield whenever war happens. Women has relatively much sheltered existence. Hence position of women is subservient to man. In industrialised set up man and increasing doing the same work but old habits die hard. Dominance once gained is difficult to give up. India is still a land of feudal mindset and remain so for another 1000 years.
How ridiculous PRINT! Rhea was the wrong choice for Sushant and not the other way. Despite all evidence you are supporting the wrong person. Sushant was the people’s choice actor and had a great potential. Very intelligent, talented and a philanthropist. He had joined films in 2013 and made a mark in a short span . People were jealous of him and did all possible thing to demoralize him and finally he is no more. How cruel and malicious the world is to show such malice against a person who is no more. God will be the leveller. I have tremendous faith in the almighty. I will support Sushant Singh Rajput despite your devious attempt to tarnish his image. My prayers for SSR. May justice prevail and may the dishonest ,immortal people bite the dust.
inadvertently, the family’s allegations have justified the earlier point that SSR was troublesome and industry big-wigs stayed away. Today, his girlfriend, his colleagues, his friends and even his cook are in trouble!
The author is the same person who said when girl friend comes into life of person, he should forget his parents. Looks like she is so obsessed with culprit. Birds of the same feather flock together.
Nothing written in the article can justify Rhea purchasing drugs on behalf of her lover boy and in fact encouraging his alleged addiction and in effect causing aggravations in his mental state. What kind of love is this? No matter what the author of this article states, I view live-in relation as strictly short-term, whereas the married wife would always have a long term view and would never, barring a few exceptions, encourage addictions of her husband. Furthermore, a married wife would enjoy all the rights of inheritance, a live-in partner is without any rights whatsoever. And this conclusion is based on the liberal assumption that whatever Rhea has stated is factual. If the assumption is not true, Rhea is in for greater trouble. What has she gained by the relationship.? Young girls need to take this into account and desist from going into short-term relationships without any application of mind. This will not, in my view, contribute to a healthy society.
PP Ji…. yes you are right, your type is always right.
But your calm chauvinism is confusing. So: if live in is inherently short term and without a wife’s rights ( totally correct re Indian society), then why should live in have any responsibility to mental state and alleged other addiction of lover boy – full grown man that, until proof emerged, everyone was denying had any mental trouble?
Would your attitude work in reverse gender also? If the suicide had been the girl?
the whole Rhea Chakraborthy issue is a frame-up .The case is a hoax.It is only misguided officers in PMO who started this futile excercise when narender modi cried out that he feels very sad on sushant’s suicide as sushant was a good TV star.thereafter the overzelousness knew no bounds.The case was given various colours just because prime minister took a fancy for sushant.nothing more. everybody knows film stars take to drugs etc when they turn out failures.Sushant was not a successful star.he could not reach dizzy heights like amitabh bachan or salman khan.He was depressed,broke and had no money to pay his cook’s salary.Morever he had not much roles either and whatever he had ,there was no money in it.Please try to help that poor Rhea chakraborthy.
Get uncles from gulf to help her with money and drugs.
Do you have any shame in you? Who is this everybody ? And your claim aboud Sushant not being successful is a bloody joke. So get your facts right. And if you have nothing good to say, then I’d say shut the hell up.
The author and editor should check facts before writing an article. I will never read The Print again. This is such a lousy article and very biased.
Rhea was involved in drug cartel since 2017 – a long time much before she started dating SSR – the accessed drug chats date back to 2017 – SSR was in relationship with Ankita Lokhande back then. In 2017 for whom had she been procuring these stuff The Print – can u please elaborate on this in your blind article – the way other media houses are targeting her passing their own judgement – in the same way I can see your article too is giving a lame conclusion – SSR wasn’t the right choice for Rhea ? Are you also not following the same footsteps as the other mainstream media giving your own verdict ? ? ? Ok I agree to your article stated facts – but does in pure love does a partner push their loved ones towards such a sinister path- encourage him to get deeply involved into it knowing it very well that it would gradually destroy him OR try her level best to bring him back to the right track – Rhea might be taking him to the doctor’s but on other hand she kept on providing him those drugs if her claims are to be believed? Then what’s the purpose to take him to the doctor? all in vain ? Stop practising one- sided journalism through such rubbish articles.
I don’t believe that posting such article is going to change the real truth behind all this fuss.This matter is not about “feminism” someone’s life has been taken away and all we are doing is supporting someone who took advantage of her innocent boyfriend.We all know that she took drugs and even gave it to her boyfriend knowing the fact that she is not supposed to do so legally or morally.Instead of helping him out of the situation by either informing his parents about it or by helping him out by herself through medications or through other things she gave a damn and gave him drugs in an inappropriate amount.She even restricted him from communicating with his family.She totally isolated him from the world.HOW IS THAT NOT WRONG?Talking about NIRBHAYA CASE YES OF COURSE THE RAPIST HAD TO DIE WHETHER OR NOT HIS WIFE PLEADED OR BEGGED FOR HER HUSBAND’S LIFE.Someone’s life has been taken away and we all are wasting our time in debating about unnecessary issues.Instead of catching the real culprit we all are bringing up these issues which are totally not related to this matter.Even I am a girl and I know how narrow minded out society is.I know how women are blamed for everything but this matter has nothing to do with it.
Seriously? You just choose to ignore that she had been a part of a drug raket for a very long time?
DEALING IN DRUGS IS A CRIME, NO MATTER WHAT EXCUSE YOU GIVE OR FOR WHOMSOEVER YOU ARE DOING IT OR EVEN IF YOU ARE DOING IT FOR THE SAKE OF “LOVE”.
So Ms. Jyoti, is it wrong to expect some one to take right decision, how many wrong decision did she not make, ok tell me one right decision from rhea,rather giving paid article why can’t you try and think. I won’t say she selected wrong guy, but when she says he was depressed,she fulfilled his wishes for drug’s, that too in huge qty, she needed common sense only for that to do right thing. Why not inform Family on the seriousness, why did not she give medical file, and when he had panic attack why leave suddenly? Why not call anyone at his home or flat mates when she got news?? what stopped her. Why accusing only SSR for drug’s when clearly she also took it, it’s Sad that just coz someone is not alive you put all blame on him. Clearly she did not make wise decision, distanced family and friends..let her prove it otherwise. Stop this fake FEMENISM, if she is in jail that is due to her involvement and solid proof.
Very well said.
The Print Peddling for a drug peddler. Wow. no moral compass.
Like an ‘adarniya abala nari’, she procured banned substances for her man. This was a grown up woman making her own free choice. And then, when caught in her own web, she turned around and cried ‘smash patriarchy’. Bravo!
Well written article.. all true about the society. Imagine an ex girlfriend ankita asking on social media, should rhea who loved sushant have allowed him to smoke marijuana? Procured it for sushant ? She is so wrong for it jail her!
It’s cringeworthy ! Ankita has no education on depression or marijuana legal in 36 countries for medical reasons. That jibe. Taking india back to stone age.
Rhea is innocent and this girl we pray is unbroken from this psycho witchhunt on her. Love and power to rhe
Fake victimhood, bogus arguments, fake article.
Absolutely. We all are responsible for the society.We should do our part to give a better message not to argue to proof ourself right
To understand patriarchy you have to understand feudal mindset. In feudal set up men rigorously works in the field whole days and dies in the battlefield whenever war happens. Women has relatively much sheltered existence. Hence position of women is subservient to man. In industrialised set up man and increasing doing the same work but old habits die hard. Dominance once gained is difficult to give up. India is still a land of feudal mindset and remain so for another 1000 years.
Whole day, man and woman
How ridiculous PRINT! Rhea was the wrong choice for Sushant and not the other way. Despite all evidence you are supporting the wrong person. Sushant was the people’s choice actor and had a great potential. Very intelligent, talented and a philanthropist. He had joined films in 2013 and made a mark in a short span . People were jealous of him and did all possible thing to demoralize him and finally he is no more. How cruel and malicious the world is to show such malice against a person who is no more. God will be the leveller. I have tremendous faith in the almighty. I will support Sushant Singh Rajput despite your devious attempt to tarnish his image. My prayers for SSR. May justice prevail and may the dishonest ,immortal people bite the dust.
inadvertently, the family’s allegations have justified the earlier point that SSR was troublesome and industry big-wigs stayed away. Today, his girlfriend, his colleagues, his friends and even his cook are in trouble!
The author is the same person who said when girl friend comes into life of person, he should forget his parents. Looks like she is so obsessed with culprit. Birds of the same feather flock together.
Nothing written in the article can justify Rhea purchasing drugs on behalf of her lover boy and in fact encouraging his alleged addiction and in effect causing aggravations in his mental state. What kind of love is this? No matter what the author of this article states, I view live-in relation as strictly short-term, whereas the married wife would always have a long term view and would never, barring a few exceptions, encourage addictions of her husband. Furthermore, a married wife would enjoy all the rights of inheritance, a live-in partner is without any rights whatsoever. And this conclusion is based on the liberal assumption that whatever Rhea has stated is factual. If the assumption is not true, Rhea is in for greater trouble. What has she gained by the relationship.? Young girls need to take this into account and desist from going into short-term relationships without any application of mind. This will not, in my view, contribute to a healthy society.
PP Ji…. yes you are right, your type is always right.
But your calm chauvinism is confusing. So: if live in is inherently short term and without a wife’s rights ( totally correct re Indian society), then why should live in have any responsibility to mental state and alleged other addiction of lover boy – full grown man that, until proof emerged, everyone was denying had any mental trouble?
Would your attitude work in reverse gender also? If the suicide had been the girl?
the whole Rhea Chakraborthy issue is a frame-up .The case is a hoax.It is only misguided officers in PMO who started this futile excercise when narender modi cried out that he feels very sad on sushant’s suicide as sushant was a good TV star.thereafter the overzelousness knew no bounds.The case was given various colours just because prime minister took a fancy for sushant.nothing more. everybody knows film stars take to drugs etc when they turn out failures.Sushant was not a successful star.he could not reach dizzy heights like amitabh bachan or salman khan.He was depressed,broke and had no money to pay his cook’s salary.Morever he had not much roles either and whatever he had ,there was no money in it.Please try to help that poor Rhea chakraborthy.
Get uncles from gulf to help her with money and drugs.
Do you have any shame in you? Who is this everybody ? And your claim aboud Sushant not being successful is a bloody joke. So get your facts right. And if you have nothing good to say, then I’d say shut the hell up.