Saket court orders IIT-Delhi to pay Swamy his salary for the period between 1972 and 1991. BJP leader had taught economics in the institute in the late 1960s.
10 Russian students are in India to work with local students on projects like space tech & clean energy. These will be presented to Putin & Modi on 5 October.
The claim that VB-GRAMG provides an employment guarantee is incorrect. The only guarantee is to 'empower' the Centre to allow partial implementation in notified areas alone.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
This is not just good governance in IIT Delhi,but it is a trecherious act of management to hang of a visiting lecturer ,by not giving his due in time .Asking for more than one education job, seems to be a nice option .But carrying out for years in court is like Pakistan and kashmir talk ,which does not come to any solution .Swamys courage and paitaient needs to be honoured .At the end ,member of party was instrumental ,means big quotion mark of hatredness .
This type of legal battle needs to be stopped soon,bringing out of court settlement .Spending for legal matter from tax payers money is an offence too.
If he was sacked by IIT IT DOES NOT MEAN HE SHOULD NOT WORK ELSEWHETE. HIS CASE IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT AND ONE COURT ALSO CONFIRM. THEY SHOULD HAVE PUT AND END BUT AS IITIANS ARE WISE THEY CHASED THE FAILING CASE. SNY FA WOULD HAVE ADVISED. BECAUSE IT IS LAWYER THEY DO EHAT YOU TELL. THEY ARE SERVANTS OF CLIENT. THEY TELL WJETHER THE CASE IS STRLNG OR.WRAK IF THEY ATE GE TLEME
Legal battle for not to give dues ,and asking earning details ,is like linking every thing for one ,intention to snap earning .
This is not just good governance in IIT Delhi,but it is a trecherious act of management to hang of a visiting lecturer ,by not giving his due in time .Asking for more than one education job, seems to be a nice option .But carrying out for years in court is like Pakistan and kashmir talk ,which does not come to any solution .Swamys courage and paitaient needs to be honoured .At the end ,member of party was instrumental ,means big quotion mark of hatredness .
This type of legal battle needs to be stopped soon,bringing out of court settlement .Spending for legal matter from tax payers money is an offence too.
If he was sacked by IIT IT DOES NOT MEAN HE SHOULD NOT WORK ELSEWHETE. HIS CASE IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT AND ONE COURT ALSO CONFIRM. THEY SHOULD HAVE PUT AND END BUT AS IITIANS ARE WISE THEY CHASED THE FAILING CASE. SNY FA WOULD HAVE ADVISED. BECAUSE IT IS LAWYER THEY DO EHAT YOU TELL. THEY ARE SERVANTS OF CLIENT. THEY TELL WJETHER THE CASE IS STRLNG OR.WRAK IF THEY ATE GE TLEME