Home ministry, in reply to an RTI, told information panel the police force does not have right to form any association without permission of the central govt.
I conducted a disability issues session for the civil servants of the 94th Foundation Class of 2019 at the training in Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration.
With 20.2 percent of its total loans in default by the end of last year, Bangladesh had the weakest banking system in Asia. Despite reforms, it will take time to recover.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
Recognition of all Central Civil Service Associations by govt under provisions of Rules 1993; Art 33 of constitution (50th amendmt) & GoI decision below Rule 15 CCS (conduct Rules) are relevent.
Police forces Restrictions of Rights Act 1966 appends Police Act 1861 at SL no. 2 of list of acts affected.
Section 3 (b) of the Police Forces Restriction of Rights Act, 1966 which flows from the constitution of India clearly prohibits any central government employee from forming an association or union without the express prior sanction of the central government unless the association so formed is purely for social, religious or recreational purposes. In other words service associations have to have sanction of the central government and charitable associations have to be registered with registrar of societies. If CIPSA is registered as a charitable association then it can not work for the furtherance of service interests of those in service. The objectives of CIPSA clearly stipulate that it is to work for the welfare of retired officers, rehabilitation and housing etc. The CIPSA has definitely gone beyond the scope of their registered bylaws in contesting in courts to safeguard the interests of their serving colleagues. Saying that the Police Forces Restriction of Rights Act, 1966 does not apply to them is totally baseless and misleading. Schedule annexed to the same act is a list of Police establishments which come under the ambit of this act. Police act, 1861 is one of them which has been amended from time to time.
If police who are to uphold rule of law start forming association, will it be army, called to protect law from such unionism?
If the logic put forth is assumed to be valid will it not be extended to CAPF and then to Army as well?
Need to understand the spirit behind such legislation instead of arguing to uphold self interest.
The actual fact is post joining the services these officers are so busy in managing their postings and Political bosses. Exceptions are always there, Shri Ajit Doval , Shri K Vijay Kumar, who can undermine their contributions. But most of them forget the basic tenants of any Uniform Officer this is why now they have gone to say that IPS are not under the ambit of Police Officers (Restrictions of Rights) Act. It means they want to say that they are not Police Officers rather they are competitors of IAS. This is why the policing in most of the states are not prepared to meet the challenges. The few IPS officers who wants to work honestly are overwhelmed by inefficient but good managers.
CIPSA
Recognition of all Central Civil Service Associations by govt under provisions of Rules 1993; Art 33 of constitution (50th amendmt) & GoI decision below Rule 15 CCS (conduct Rules) are relevent.
Police forces Restrictions of Rights Act 1966 appends Police Act 1861 at SL no. 2 of list of acts affected.
Section 3 (b) of the Police Forces Restriction of Rights Act, 1966 which flows from the constitution of India clearly prohibits any central government employee from forming an association or union without the express prior sanction of the central government unless the association so formed is purely for social, religious or recreational purposes. In other words service associations have to have sanction of the central government and charitable associations have to be registered with registrar of societies. If CIPSA is registered as a charitable association then it can not work for the furtherance of service interests of those in service. The objectives of CIPSA clearly stipulate that it is to work for the welfare of retired officers, rehabilitation and housing etc. The CIPSA has definitely gone beyond the scope of their registered bylaws in contesting in courts to safeguard the interests of their serving colleagues. Saying that the Police Forces Restriction of Rights Act, 1966 does not apply to them is totally baseless and misleading. Schedule annexed to the same act is a list of Police establishments which come under the ambit of this act. Police act, 1861 is one of them which has been amended from time to time.
If police who are to uphold rule of law start forming association, will it be army, called to protect law from such unionism?
If the logic put forth is assumed to be valid will it not be extended to CAPF and then to Army as well?
Need to understand the spirit behind such legislation instead of arguing to uphold self interest.
The actual fact is post joining the services these officers are so busy in managing their postings and Political bosses. Exceptions are always there, Shri Ajit Doval , Shri K Vijay Kumar, who can undermine their contributions. But most of them forget the basic tenants of any Uniform Officer this is why now they have gone to say that IPS are not under the ambit of Police Officers (Restrictions of Rights) Act. It means they want to say that they are not Police Officers rather they are competitors of IAS. This is why the policing in most of the states are not prepared to meet the challenges. The few IPS officers who wants to work honestly are overwhelmed by inefficient but good managers.