Kejriwal’s Delhi govt said effective stubble fire counts in Punjab & Haryana increased to 2,577 in the last 24 hours, pushing air pollution levels to severe.
Top BJP leaders moved swiftly to cobble together a majority in the 90-member Haryana Assembly after the party's tally fell six short of the majority mark.
Two questions are pertinent: Why does the Trump administration keep making the same mistakes on the peace proposal? And what does a hurried peace plan mean on the ground?
While global corporations setting up GCCs in India continue to express confidence in availability of skilled AI engineers, the panel argued that India’s real challenge lies elsewhere.
Without a Congress revival, there can be no challenge to the BJP pan-nationally. Modi’s party is growing, and almost entirely at the cost of the Congress.
I don’t think there is anything comparable between them – the states, the circumstances, the people and the ethos.
First, Haryana is much much different than Bihar in every respect – economically, socially and politically. They are, therefore, simply not comparable.
Politics of Bihar has been much more sensitive but matured than Haryana.
Lalu ji has been a product of great revolution with his socialistic leanings – with deep rooted social commitments.
We may criticise Lalu ji for each and every ill of Bihar, for his alleged involvement in mafias and for not caring anything around him. But fact remains, he have had the capability of giving direction to his times politics – an undisputed leader of real mass appeal. He would not go with the TIME but would create his own TIME on his own terms. There has not been any other leader of such a mass appeal in Bihar. He would create his own space wherever he would be. No leader anywhere in the country could be comparable to him during his time. And this all only slowly finished him.
There is nothing that people know about Tejashwi politically. But surely he doesn’t have thrFire of his father within him. The way he behaved after the debacle of his party recently proved only his complete lack of any virtue of a Leader. Thus one can’t conclude he will not do what Dushyant has done. He is nowhere and no way like his father and apparently he does not at all know about any of the political skills of his father. He seems like an core opportunist and will, in all probability, very well do anything for power given the opportunity.
Therefore, Mandal ji, you seem to be keeping in mind Lalu ji while talking about Tejashwi. And this appears to be a fallacy only!
This author has a habit of eulogizing the fodder eating thug family from Bihar. He feels everyone is out to marginalise the backward sections and sees heros in dacoits like Lalu and Tejashwi. While yes, Tejashwi might never ally with BJP because it will impact the Muslim vote, everyone is Patna’s corridors of powers know how BJP has got tejashwi under it’s thumb by fear of CBI and ED. Everyone knows the Grand Alliance Govt fell because Nitish Kumar preempted an attempt by Lalu to strike a deal with BJP in return for relief in Fodder and Railway scam cases. This marauding gang of looters called the rjd has always compromised with ideology and tried to solicit back room deals in lieu of favours, but yes they won’t up front support BJP because they want Muslims to continue to believe their “secular credentials”. If this charade gives pleasure to this biased, myopic and uninformed author, so be it.
Hindustan ki rajneeti me koi Sant-mahatma nahi hai -as recently said by sanjay raut of SS.Jis ka koi sidhhant na ho,moral na ho,desh ki koi parwah na ho,aur khood-chor,corrupt, kamina,gaddar,nich ghatia,immoral,jootha,dhongi,farebi,paisa khau,maha brasht aadi mahan goon wala ho wo hi is desh me raj neta ban sakta hai aur survive ho pata hai.
Why is Muslim drama important, was India didn’t got divided on the basis of religion? Why people with Arabi names are considered part of India.
Lastly, regarding the writers demography it also proves why Haryana is ahead then Bihar. Haryana almost kicked Ms out in 1947 except ( in Mewat district which is the most backward of the state) where Bihar kept them and suffered.
Dushyant is made himself by himself without the support of his father or traditonal party. But Tejasvi is just a big zero without the name of Lalu ( chara chor)
The writer is a rabid communal. On one hand he claims that RJD is a secular party and on the other he talks about getting the Muslim vote is most important for the party. Print allows such writers free space.
In any case is Tejasvi a full time politician? The writer should do a fact check.
Tejasvi Yadav is a head strong young political thug. He is no politician. On his own, he would have been a non-entity in Bihar politics. Do you think that playing caste politics as the Yadavs do in Bihar is secularism. You define secularism rater narrowly, as pro-Muslim politics. Post 2014, such view has by and large failed.
I don’t think there is anything comparable between them – the states, the circumstances, the people and the ethos.
First, Haryana is much much different than Bihar in every respect – economically, socially and politically. They are, therefore, simply not comparable.
Politics of Bihar has been much more sensitive but matured than Haryana.
Lalu ji has been a product of great revolution with his socialistic leanings – with deep rooted social commitments.
We may criticise Lalu ji for each and every ill of Bihar, for his alleged involvement in mafias and for not caring anything around him. But fact remains, he have had the capability of giving direction to his times politics – an undisputed leader of real mass appeal. He would not go with the TIME but would create his own TIME on his own terms. There has not been any other leader of such a mass appeal in Bihar. He would create his own space wherever he would be. No leader anywhere in the country could be comparable to him during his time. And this all only slowly finished him.
There is nothing that people know about Tejashwi politically. But surely he doesn’t have thrFire of his father within him. The way he behaved after the debacle of his party recently proved only his complete lack of any virtue of a Leader. Thus one can’t conclude he will not do what Dushyant has done. He is nowhere and no way like his father and apparently he does not at all know about any of the political skills of his father. He seems like an core opportunist and will, in all probability, very well do anything for power given the opportunity.
Therefore, Mandal ji, you seem to be keeping in mind Lalu ji while talking about Tejashwi. And this appears to be a fallacy only!
This author has a habit of eulogizing the fodder eating thug family from Bihar. He feels everyone is out to marginalise the backward sections and sees heros in dacoits like Lalu and Tejashwi. While yes, Tejashwi might never ally with BJP because it will impact the Muslim vote, everyone is Patna’s corridors of powers know how BJP has got tejashwi under it’s thumb by fear of CBI and ED. Everyone knows the Grand Alliance Govt fell because Nitish Kumar preempted an attempt by Lalu to strike a deal with BJP in return for relief in Fodder and Railway scam cases. This marauding gang of looters called the rjd has always compromised with ideology and tried to solicit back room deals in lieu of favours, but yes they won’t up front support BJP because they want Muslims to continue to believe their “secular credentials”. If this charade gives pleasure to this biased, myopic and uninformed author, so be it.
Is secularism pro-muslim and anti-hindu. Please define what is secularism.
Hindustan ki rajneeti me koi Sant-mahatma nahi hai -as recently said by sanjay raut of SS.Jis ka koi sidhhant na ho,moral na ho,desh ki koi parwah na ho,aur khood-chor,corrupt, kamina,gaddar,nich ghatia,immoral,jootha,dhongi,farebi,paisa khau,maha brasht aadi mahan goon wala ho wo hi is desh me raj neta ban sakta hai aur survive ho pata hai.
Why is Muslim drama important, was India didn’t got divided on the basis of religion? Why people with Arabi names are considered part of India.
Lastly, regarding the writers demography it also proves why Haryana is ahead then Bihar. Haryana almost kicked Ms out in 1947 except ( in Mewat district which is the most backward of the state) where Bihar kept them and suffered.
Dushyant is made himself by himself without the support of his father or traditonal party. But Tejasvi is just a big zero without the name of Lalu ( chara chor)
The writer is a rabid communal. On one hand he claims that RJD is a secular party and on the other he talks about getting the Muslim vote is most important for the party. Print allows such writers free space.
In any case is Tejasvi a full time politician? The writer should do a fact check.
Tejasvi Yadav is a head strong young political thug. He is no politician. On his own, he would have been a non-entity in Bihar politics. Do you think that playing caste politics as the Yadavs do in Bihar is secularism. You define secularism rater narrowly, as pro-Muslim politics. Post 2014, such view has by and large failed.