On 17 October 2023, the Supreme Court rejected the plea for queer persons' right to marry. A year later, a discussion on lawyer Rohin Bhatt’s book discloses what went wrong.
Mehrub Moiz Awan, a transgender politician and rights activist in Pakistan told ThePrint the country was seeing the weaponisation of homosexuality by Right-wing groups.
Urvashi Vaid was ‘the most prolific LGBTQ organiser in history’; her peers describe her as a prophet of the LGBTQ movement. It all began at an anti-Vietnam War rally she attended at 11.
It's 'developed, Western European countries' that show highest acceptance of legalising same-sex marriage, but India is among exceptions, finds survey.
Court will take up 12 pleas — 2 filed in the SC, and 10 others in high courts — that seek legal recognition for same-sex marriage. Modi govt has opposed demand as ‘elitist view’.
SC considering broadening scope of Gender Sensitization & Internal Complaints Committee. Changes come after lawyer Rohin Bhatt wrote to CJI to end 'discrimination against queer community'.
Is there a place for a counter-bureaucracy, or a separate and competing bureaucracy to counterbalance the force of the executive’s bureaucracy, asked author MH Mody in 1980.
With bad loans shrinking & capital buffers stronger, urban co-op banks’ new umbrella body NUCFDC is now prioritising rollout of digital transformation.
If deal goes through, Greece will be 2nd foreign country to procure vehicle. Morocco was first; TATA Group has set up manufacturing unit there with minimum 30 percent indigenous content.
Many of you might think I got something so wrong in National Interest pieces written this year. I might disagree! But some deserve a Mea Culpa. I’d deal with the most recent this week.
The issue is that India does not have a common civil code. So this is not about one law being changed, it is one per religion, plus special marriage act. And if it is religion based what is the authority of the Supreme Court of any country to decide what is allowed for a religion. Hence the dilemma. In order to do this, there should be a uniform civil code that gives the courts the authority to decide on this or issues like this in a denomination non specific manner
The fact that there are no comments here shows that this isn’t a subject too many people care deeply about, as opposed to the west, where it has been co-opted by one side of their cuture wars. I think the most sensible thing would be to have a civil union kind of thing which disregards sex and orientation. But can the court mandate that it exist to safeguard queer rights under India’s constitution? Governments may just ignore the court, as they have before. The time for this idea has just not come yet in India.
The issue is that India does not have a common civil code. So this is not about one law being changed, it is one per religion, plus special marriage act. And if it is religion based what is the authority of the Supreme Court of any country to decide what is allowed for a religion. Hence the dilemma. In order to do this, there should be a uniform civil code that gives the courts the authority to decide on this or issues like this in a denomination non specific manner
The fact that there are no comments here shows that this isn’t a subject too many people care deeply about, as opposed to the west, where it has been co-opted by one side of their cuture wars. I think the most sensible thing would be to have a civil union kind of thing which disregards sex and orientation. But can the court mandate that it exist to safeguard queer rights under India’s constitution? Governments may just ignore the court, as they have before. The time for this idea has just not come yet in India.