On 17 October 2023, the Supreme Court rejected the plea for queer persons' right to marry. A year later, a discussion on lawyer Rohin Bhatt’s book discloses what went wrong.
Mehrub Moiz Awan, a transgender politician and rights activist in Pakistan told ThePrint the country was seeing the weaponisation of homosexuality by Right-wing groups.
Urvashi Vaid was ‘the most prolific LGBTQ organiser in history’; her peers describe her as a prophet of the LGBTQ movement. It all began at an anti-Vietnam War rally she attended at 11.
It's 'developed, Western European countries' that show highest acceptance of legalising same-sex marriage, but India is among exceptions, finds survey.
Court will take up 12 pleas — 2 filed in the SC, and 10 others in high courts — that seek legal recognition for same-sex marriage. Modi govt has opposed demand as ‘elitist view’.
SC considering broadening scope of Gender Sensitization & Internal Complaints Committee. Changes come after lawyer Rohin Bhatt wrote to CJI to end 'discrimination against queer community'.
Mumbai’s Color Positive Foundation is holding its first pride march on 28 January. But other top LGBTQI+ organisations like Humsafar Trust and Azaadi Mumbai have kept a distance.
The Hindu religion based on which his party runs its political business, acknowledges not just same sex relationships but also marriage, writes Raj Gopinathan.
At Hindu College, Zakir Husain College, Jesus and Mary College, and Sri Guru Gobind Singh College, the demands of students for a queer collective are met with resistance, ignorance, indifference, and even threats by authorities.
Delhi lawyer Rohin Bhatt got 'death threats' after his letter to CJI came out in public domain. He sought inclusion of section in SC advocates' appearance slips for mentioning pronouns.
On 29 May 1951, Jawaharlal Nehru defended adding 'reasonable restrictions' to Article 19, arguing that free speech must be balanced with national security and unity.
On bilateral ties, Admiral Paparo said India-US ties have an exponential effect on deterrence, because it demonstrates a unity of purpose among us to maintain the peace.
This is the game every nation is now learning to play. Some are finding new allies or seeing value among nations where they’d seen marginal interest. The starkest example is India & Europe.
The issue is that India does not have a common civil code. So this is not about one law being changed, it is one per religion, plus special marriage act. And if it is religion based what is the authority of the Supreme Court of any country to decide what is allowed for a religion. Hence the dilemma. In order to do this, there should be a uniform civil code that gives the courts the authority to decide on this or issues like this in a denomination non specific manner
The fact that there are no comments here shows that this isn’t a subject too many people care deeply about, as opposed to the west, where it has been co-opted by one side of their cuture wars. I think the most sensible thing would be to have a civil union kind of thing which disregards sex and orientation. But can the court mandate that it exist to safeguard queer rights under India’s constitution? Governments may just ignore the court, as they have before. The time for this idea has just not come yet in India.
The issue is that India does not have a common civil code. So this is not about one law being changed, it is one per religion, plus special marriage act. And if it is religion based what is the authority of the Supreme Court of any country to decide what is allowed for a religion. Hence the dilemma. In order to do this, there should be a uniform civil code that gives the courts the authority to decide on this or issues like this in a denomination non specific manner
The fact that there are no comments here shows that this isn’t a subject too many people care deeply about, as opposed to the west, where it has been co-opted by one side of their cuture wars. I think the most sensible thing would be to have a civil union kind of thing which disregards sex and orientation. But can the court mandate that it exist to safeguard queer rights under India’s constitution? Governments may just ignore the court, as they have before. The time for this idea has just not come yet in India.