Prasar Bharti has time and again accused foreign media of “biased” and “fake” reportage, with CEO Vempati saying such coverage creates wrong perception of India.
Compassion and cohabitation with animals are ingrained in the Indian value system. A humane solution must be found for the rising conflict between man and free-range animals.
New bill aims to fix key issues with IBC 2016, including delays & patchy implementation, and protect creditors, with window for genuine promoters to retain control of their companies.
Putin sees this as a victory. Europeans have decided to deal with Trump on his terms for the sake of the larger Western alliance. We look at the lessons for us in India.
Such a coloured-language is the new-norm on part of a quasi-autonomous, self-sustainable Prasar Bharti® that it’s barely shocking.
Forget about their whining to other outlets. And Mr “Whatever doesn’t suit the narrative of Indian Establishment is the enemy of facts” CEO sounds like a well-versed spin doctor.
That, or Ms Amrita was too-scared/very-ill-prepared. But anyhoo, she should’ve asked that “why only amplify the publishing of international-press in affairs nothing to do with India?”. Have his canards risen to the extent that any notable event re “the Republic” of India will not be covered fairly by the foreign press? If so, anything to substantiate his arguments with or he just have misdirections and dog-whistles like every other social-media “expert” next door?
That every conchshell-blaring Bollywood, daily-soaps-as-“series” and other output other than newsgathering have financial blessings of the estate of His Holiness Karl Marx?
Still better than BBC
“News Jihad”?!? Seriously?
Such a coloured-language is the new-norm on part of a quasi-autonomous, self-sustainable Prasar Bharti® that it’s barely shocking.
Forget about their whining to other outlets. And Mr “Whatever doesn’t suit the narrative of Indian Establishment is the enemy of facts” CEO sounds like a well-versed spin doctor.
That, or Ms Amrita was too-scared/very-ill-prepared. But anyhoo, she should’ve asked that “why only amplify the publishing of international-press in affairs nothing to do with India?”. Have his canards risen to the extent that any notable event re “the Republic” of India will not be covered fairly by the foreign press? If so, anything to substantiate his arguments with or he just have misdirections and dog-whistles like every other social-media “expert” next door?
The foreign coverage is fake because the domestic coverage by the Marxist media is also fake.
What’s a “Marxist media[sic]”?
That every conchshell-blaring Bollywood, daily-soaps-as-“series” and other output other than newsgathering have financial blessings of the estate of His Holiness Karl Marx?