A survey by NGO Common Cause and Lokniti shows Adivasis are most afraid of being framed for Maoist activities, while Dalits are afraid of being falsely accused of petty thefts.
The existence of films like Rajinikanth’s latest Kaala suggests that the world’s largest film industry could stand to gain from films which talk about caste.
Are Dalits of Raghopur and West Bengal not Dalits? Only when Dalits are attacked in Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh, there is mass outrage among urban intellectuals.
Maharashtra will be the third state after Tamil Nadu and Madhya Pradesh to have such a scheme, a govt-constituted panel to finalise modalities of the plan.
If this step even partially achieves its desired results, there will be so much dislocation in the country’s economic structure as to prove a national calamity, advocate AG Mulgaokar wrote in 1969.
Recommendations appear in Niti Aayog’s Tax Policy Working Paper Series–II. It says there is a need to shift away from fear-based enforcement to trust-based governance.
In service with the British military since 2019, it is also known as the Martlet missile. Ukrainians have also deployed these missiles against Russian troops.
Education, reservations, govt jobs are meant to bring equality and dignity. That we are a long way from that is evident in the shoe thrown at the CJI and the suicide of Haryana IPS officer. The film Homebound has a lesson too.
Vibudha LK. Correct, so what should be the minimum sample size for such deduction? Coming from a research background, for prevalence estimation, a’g to any widely understood formula for sample size calculation like 4pq/lsquare, the sample size seems more than enough.
I don’t know whether you have a science background or not but if you are demanding a sample bigger than this then you should also stop believing in clinical trials and modern medicine. All of them are conducted in a far lesser population than this, because the criteria should be at least minimum sample size not any magic number that one considers important by virtue of experience etc.
I am sorry I am not using my real name because I don’t want to be abused and trolled, I am too old for that. Probably you wouldn’t, but many do. Please ask for clarification if you want to know further about the same.
I’m sorry if you were trolled or abused. Everyone experience that at one or the other point in their life including me. And, you make a good point. But the thing is, a research in Chemistry or Medicine is a totally diff ball game. A person in UK or US can be tested for medicinal purpose and the same medicine can be use in other parts of the world. But thats not the same thing here right. What I feel is not the same as what you feel. Two people coming from the same background, with the same education and bringing up, will feel differently about different topics. Hence, you can’t, and I stress it, you simply cannot put up a headline saying 1 in 2 Indian Muslims, jus because you claim that you have interviewed some 0.001% of the population. Because each individual has a different feeling. You cannot generalise it. All you achieve in doing so is creating fear and incepting your own opinions in people’s mind. Which is so wrong on so many levels. Hope you get my point.
I hope they dont cancel my reply
The population of India is 135.4 crores aprox.
You claim to do a study among merely 15,000 respondants. That is approx 0.001% of the total population. And u put up a headline stating 1 in 2 muslim feels something. I mean, how desperate are you? You should be ashamed of your articles.
I hope they dont cancel my reply
Vibudha LK. Correct, so what should be the minimum sample size for such deduction? Coming from a research background, for prevalence estimation, a’g to any widely understood formula for sample size calculation like 4pq/lsquare, the sample size seems more than enough.
I don’t know whether you have a science background or not but if you are demanding a sample bigger than this then you should also stop believing in clinical trials and modern medicine. All of them are conducted in a far lesser population than this, because the criteria should be at least minimum sample size not any magic number that one considers important by virtue of experience etc.
I am sorry I am not using my real name because I don’t want to be abused and trolled, I am too old for that. Probably you wouldn’t, but many do. Please ask for clarification if you want to know further about the same.
I’m sorry if you were trolled or abused. Everyone experience that at one or the other point in their life including me. And, you make a good point. But the thing is, a research in Chemistry or Medicine is a totally diff ball game. A person in UK or US can be tested for medicinal purpose and the same medicine can be use in other parts of the world. But thats not the same thing here right. What I feel is not the same as what you feel. Two people coming from the same background, with the same education and bringing up, will feel differently about different topics. Hence, you can’t, and I stress it, you simply cannot put up a headline saying 1 in 2 Indian Muslims, jus because you claim that you have interviewed some 0.001% of the population. Because each individual has a different feeling. You cannot generalise it. All you achieve in doing so is creating fear and incepting your own opinions in people’s mind. Which is so wrong on so many levels. Hope you get my point.
I hope they dont cancel my reply
The population of India is 135.4 crores aprox.
You claim to do a study among merely 15,000 respondants. That is approx 0.001% of the total population. And u put up a headline stating 1 in 2 muslim feels something. I mean, how desperate are you? You should be ashamed of your articles.