A field survey conducted by Centre for Policy Research, University of Texas and UC Berkely tracked changes in open defecation in rural north India in the last five years.
Temple demolished on SC order after 27-year legal battle. Dalits say telling them to find a new spot akin to asking Hindus to build Ram temple outside Ayodhya.
Petitioners in Supreme Court accuse high courts across the country of weakening the stringent clauses of SC/ST Act that Modi govt had restored in 2018.
Recommendations appear in Niti Aayog’s Tax Policy Working Paper Series–II. It says there is a need to shift away from fear-based enforcement to trust-based governance.
In service with the British military since 2019, it is also known as the Martlet missile. Ukrainians have also deployed these missiles against Russian troops.
Education, reservations, govt jobs are meant to bring equality and dignity. That we are a long way from that is evident in the shoe thrown at the CJI and the suicide of Haryana IPS officer. The film Homebound has a lesson too.
The SBM, of late, has/had become more of a political publicity than reality. it has been plagued by political interferance, currupt practices and casteism all sheilded appropriately by the muscle power of the high cast peoploe.
Yesterday, two foreigners were caught spying, when people were going about their morning business. They were caught and thoroughly thrashed. When questioned, the culprits confessed to their voyeurism. It seems they get high on such acts of defecation. The people also earlier reported seeing them around the Print office. The Indian police are investigating the connection. They have not ruled out some foreign country’s role!
Who would have thought Americans like Indian s**t? Did they take samples as proof of census? Maybe, the Print helped these guys with sample collection.
“What also has not changed is that untouchability and social inequality are important parts of why open defecation continues.”
Gold. Even if the government funds building a toilet at home, some refuse to use and this author attributes it untouchability. What a lazy attempt to peddle an agenda.
No data nothing. Just opinion and mentioning a few unfortunate cases of killing to prove that Swatch Bharat is a total failure. Swatch Bharat cannot be a 100% success in such a short span but that does not mean it’s a total failure. It’ll take timee to
change attitude.
Readers..
I request you to mention the foreign authors who write positively on India, culture, development etc., from across the media. I think the ratio could be 1:1000 !!
I have come across hardly anybody all these years.
OR
Due to ‘confirmation bias’ tendency and ‘infererior complex syndrome’, do the Indian media houses pick only these foreign authors who write negatively on India?
Shame, Shame!
Indians in general and especially those of the Angrezi ‘elite’ class, of which the the English media is a part, suffer from a deep inferiority complex. To the extent that foreigners who may have never visited India or just make short peripatetic trips to India are considered authoritaties on Indian society and it’s history, culture, economics, politics etc. Anything that comes from the gora is. God’s truth for them. And this is across the ideological spectrum.
Its a shame that half of India was defecating in the open until now. There was not even an iota of discussion on this and SBM has brought this out of the closet. Don’t these liberals/congress ecosystem have any shame. With what face can they criticize a mission that should have been started 70 years back !!!
actually it was close to 70%…n there was intermittent discussion on open defecation especially since the 2013 WHO report, infact the UPA govt sanctioned a whopping Rs 2000 to each person building a toilet.
now these authors have a problem with the govt giving them 12000.
It seems the author is relieved to be India being not ‘completely open defecation free’ so that India can still be projected as poor. They can still carry on with their racist cartoons.
What’s the problem with them?
Why can’t they see the positive outcome of the SBM which reduced the problem significantly? or atleast people became aware of the problem?
Would it have been the same commentary if there was a Congress government (hypothetical case of SBM by congress !!)?
Why couldn’t the ‘enlightened/poor centric’ congress government achieve the same?
Why do they find happiness in 0.1% or 0.01 % failure of scheme?
So that they can write another LETTER protesting the current government?
WHY not publish a rebuttal by ThePrint, after doing an extensive research?
Why don’t ThePrint stop dependency on foreign authors and encourage domestic ones?
Fully agree with author. defecation increased after SBM. It used to be much less under Nehruji, Indiraji, Rajivji and Soniaji. This government should immediately roll back SBM and restore normalcy.
As a matter of fact, it is true!! In absolute numbers of population!! 🙂 🙂 .-) … Who cares for % of population?
1961 – 439,235,000 —- Nehruji
1981 – 683,329,000 —- Indiraji
1991 – 846,387,888 —– Rajivji ( slightly stretched.. acturally after his government)
2011 – 1,210,726,932 — Soniaji
(source-wiki)
The SBM, of late, has/had become more of a political publicity than reality. it has been plagued by political interferance, currupt practices and casteism all sheilded appropriately by the muscle power of the high cast peoploe.
It is very sad that Hindus are still defecating open in this 21st century.God,save these Hindus!
Yesterday, two foreigners were caught spying, when people were going about their morning business. They were caught and thoroughly thrashed. When questioned, the culprits confessed to their voyeurism. It seems they get high on such acts of defecation. The people also earlier reported seeing them around the Print office. The Indian police are investigating the connection. They have not ruled out some foreign country’s role!
Who would have thought Americans like Indian s**t? Did they take samples as proof of census? Maybe, the Print helped these guys with sample collection.
“What also has not changed is that untouchability and social inequality are important parts of why open defecation continues.”
Gold. Even if the government funds building a toilet at home, some refuse to use and this author attributes it untouchability. What a lazy attempt to peddle an agenda.
Thanks for preaching. You guys are so superior to us. Should we leave now? Time for lota.
No data nothing. Just opinion and mentioning a few unfortunate cases of killing to prove that Swatch Bharat is a total failure. Swatch Bharat cannot be a 100% success in such a short span but that does not mean it’s a total failure. It’ll take timee to
change attitude.
Readers..
I request you to mention the foreign authors who write positively on India, culture, development etc., from across the media. I think the ratio could be 1:1000 !!
I have come across hardly anybody all these years.
OR
Due to ‘confirmation bias’ tendency and ‘infererior complex syndrome’, do the Indian media houses pick only these foreign authors who write negatively on India?
Shame, Shame!
Indians in general and especially those of the Angrezi ‘elite’ class, of which the the English media is a part, suffer from a deep inferiority complex. To the extent that foreigners who may have never visited India or just make short peripatetic trips to India are considered authoritaties on Indian society and it’s history, culture, economics, politics etc. Anything that comes from the gora is. God’s truth for them. And this is across the ideological spectrum.
Its a shame that half of India was defecating in the open until now. There was not even an iota of discussion on this and SBM has brought this out of the closet. Don’t these liberals/congress ecosystem have any shame. With what face can they criticize a mission that should have been started 70 years back !!!
actually it was close to 70%…n there was intermittent discussion on open defecation especially since the 2013 WHO report, infact the UPA govt sanctioned a whopping Rs 2000 to each person building a toilet.
now these authors have a problem with the govt giving them 12000.
It seems the author is relieved to be India being not ‘completely open defecation free’ so that India can still be projected as poor. They can still carry on with their racist cartoons.
What’s the problem with them?
Why can’t they see the positive outcome of the SBM which reduced the problem significantly? or atleast people became aware of the problem?
Would it have been the same commentary if there was a Congress government (hypothetical case of SBM by congress !!)?
Why couldn’t the ‘enlightened/poor centric’ congress government achieve the same?
Why do they find happiness in 0.1% or 0.01 % failure of scheme?
So that they can write another LETTER protesting the current government?
WHY not publish a rebuttal by ThePrint, after doing an extensive research?
Why don’t ThePrint stop dependency on foreign authors and encourage domestic ones?
Fully agree with author. defecation increased after SBM. It used to be much less under Nehruji, Indiraji, Rajivji and Soniaji. This government should immediately roll back SBM and restore normalcy.
??
Best line so far!
As a matter of fact, it is true!! In absolute numbers of population!! 🙂 🙂 .-) … Who cares for % of population?
1961 – 439,235,000 —- Nehruji
1981 – 683,329,000 —- Indiraji
1991 – 846,387,888 —– Rajivji ( slightly stretched.. acturally after his government)
2011 – 1,210,726,932 — Soniaji
(source-wiki)
Any guess for Rahulji?