Speaking to ThePrint RS MP Ram Chander Jangra stood by his statement, asserting it was made in specific context as he was at a function to celebrate birth anniversary of Rani Ahilyabai.
Anil Firojiya, BJP MP from Ujjain, said the reality show was promoting obscenity in society and laying out 'dirty details' of contestants' personal lives in the public domain.
Over 100 BJP SC/ST MPs presented Modi a memorandum on the issue, say PM has 'assured them' it's just an observation. NDA allies & opposition parties, too, have expressed objections.
Nurses’ outfits have taken exception to BJP MP Ram Chander Jangra’s ‘misogynist sense of humour’ in Parliament, formal complaint lodged with Haryana State Commission for Women.
CM Soren has asked police and administration to take strict action. Matter has sparked anger among Jharkhand's political and social circles in backdrop of Mahto's criminal history.
Claiming innocence, Rawat announces he won’t fight any election in his public life till proven innocent. An FIR was lodged at Kotwali police station of Barabanki on Sunday night.
On Sunday night, Baghel’s health deteriorated. After a thorough physical examination, doctors declared the politician dead, citing organ failure as the cause.
Ram Shankar Katheria was sentenced to 2-yr jail in a 2011 assault & rioting case. Court points to lacunae in Representation of the People Act, while mentioning delay in conviction.
MP/MLA court sentences Etawah MP to 2 yrs in prison in 12-yr-old case against him for assaulting official of power distribution firm during a protest against the company at mall in Agra.
FIR filed Saturday against MP Subrat Pathak, 9 supporters & dozens of unknown persons in connection with alleged altercation at police post over people detained in kidnapping case.
On 29 May 1951, Jawaharlal Nehru defended adding 'reasonable restrictions' to Article 19, arguing that free speech must be balanced with national security and unity.
On bilateral ties, Admiral Paparo said India-US ties have an exponential effect on deterrence, because it demonstrates a unity of purpose among us to maintain the peace.
This is the game every nation is now learning to play. Some are finding new allies or seeing value among nations where they’d seen marginal interest. The starkest example is India & Europe.
Really feel sad and frustrated after reading your news article but also happy that you have reported this the shameful act of honorable member of Rajya Sabha. I fully appreciate and salute your guts to show real face of such shameless people.
Sometimes I wonder does our country really needed democracy? See what kind of leaders represent the citizens of our country. I only hope people will be more careful while voting.
May God save us all and our country.
Women are equal to men, and in many cases much better. No doubt that this is true in the matter of courage and loyalty. The terrorists wouldn’t have killed women because that would have reflected on their social sense of bravery.
Thus, if the women had shielded the men – perhaps many people would have been saved or the terrorists would have perhaps been delayed enough for others to come and intervene.
This same strategy can be used to save lives in times of war – by enabling women to come forward and defend the lives of men, and their own lives. However, menfolk will feel highly humiliated by this suggestion, even though it’s intelligent and practical….and they will vociferously oppose it, and claim that they are more courageous, etc, etc.
In matters of business, it can be observed that many business people keep all their wealth in the names of their women – specially those who are corrupt or exploitative – they keep all their ill-gotten wealth in their wives, daughters’ and minors’ names. It’s obviously very difficult for the law abiding authorities to go after the women. It’s the Shikhandi principle.
You can check for yourselves how the ultra rich coaching owners of Delhi and Kota guard their ill-gotten wealth – the gentlemen don’t own anything, but their partners do. You can also see how the authorities bend over backwards (in a show of chivalry) to please the women – once a woman’s name is on it – it’s a social phenomenon.
All in all, it’s not a bad idea – is it?
Really feel sad and frustrated after reading your news article but also happy that you have reported this the shameful act of honorable member of Rajya Sabha. I fully appreciate and salute your guts to show real face of such shameless people.
Sometimes I wonder does our country really needed democracy? See what kind of leaders represent the citizens of our country. I only hope people will be more careful while voting.
May God save us all and our country.
Women are equal to men, and in many cases much better. No doubt that this is true in the matter of courage and loyalty. The terrorists wouldn’t have killed women because that would have reflected on their social sense of bravery.
Thus, if the women had shielded the men – perhaps many people would have been saved or the terrorists would have perhaps been delayed enough for others to come and intervene.
This same strategy can be used to save lives in times of war – by enabling women to come forward and defend the lives of men, and their own lives. However, menfolk will feel highly humiliated by this suggestion, even though it’s intelligent and practical….and they will vociferously oppose it, and claim that they are more courageous, etc, etc.
In matters of business, it can be observed that many business people keep all their wealth in the names of their women – specially those who are corrupt or exploitative – they keep all their ill-gotten wealth in their wives, daughters’ and minors’ names. It’s obviously very difficult for the law abiding authorities to go after the women. It’s the Shikhandi principle.
You can check for yourselves how the ultra rich coaching owners of Delhi and Kota guard their ill-gotten wealth – the gentlemen don’t own anything, but their partners do. You can also see how the authorities bend over backwards (in a show of chivalry) to please the women – once a woman’s name is on it – it’s a social phenomenon.
All in all, it’s not a bad idea – is it?
He should ask if his female relatives if they would have had courage to do this.