Besides claiming to have 2 Indian pilots and even an Israeli pilot in custody, Pakistan also placed a dead crow in Balakot as part of its propaganda war.
The FIR by Pakistan's forestry department details the damage suffered by 19 trees after unidentified Indian fighter jets 'hastily dropped their payload'.
On the day the Indian Air Force downed a Pakistani F-16 and lost a MiG-21 Bison, it also lost 6 personnel in an Mi-17 V5 chopper crash about 100 km away.
Congress president Rahul Gandhi hosts G-20 envoys for lunch, discusses range of issues from terror to elections to his minimum income guarantee promise.
After a hiatus of three decades, India-China border trade was resumed through Lipulekh pass in 1992. But the volumes were nowhere close to the earlier times, since the markets they served were now better connected with highways.
Gurugram: Stirring a storm in Haryana's real estate circles, the Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP)—the state's urban development agency—has taken on the role of...
In its toughest time in decades because of floods, Punjab would’ve expected PM Modi to visit. If he has the time for a Bihar tour, why not a short visit to next-door Punjab?
It seems Indian govt deliberately downplayed the attack. When Sushma Swaraj went to China, it was portrayed as a defensive strike against militants and it wasn’t a military strike. The PM didn’t speak or release a statement about the successful, operation, all of these seems to be deliberate choices and doesn’t look like mistakes. We can only make a guess for the reason, only the decision makers would know the real reason. It seems plausible, with the strike they sent the message to Pakistan and didn’t want to gloat about to give Pakistan a face saver, so that this doesn’t escalate any further. What do I know, but this seems the most plausible answer, wonder why none of the high and mighty journalist thought of this option
Dear Rubina, The same to you, someone in Pakistan to unpack the pack of lies by Pakistani propaganda
1. IAF bombing at Balakot: Pak did not accept any damage other than trees, then why they cordon off the area for 15 days after strike and not allowed any media person ????
2. F16: Pak did not accept using it, then from where ARAAM missile part came ? They also did not accept F16 downing by a MIG (which itself was downed later in dogfight) Then how F16 wing commander Shahzaz ud din died ? Lynched after ejecting from falling F16 hit by R73 missile from MIG Bison, people gone by Pak propagande and thought him to be an Indian pilot and lynched him.
3. What is the mystery of the second captured Indian Pilot claimed by Pak TV but rejected by Pak defence official later ? Actually, he was the 2nd twin sitter fallen F16 pilot, died by falling ….
GET AWARE RUBINA, YOUR ENTIRE NATION is sitting on Pak lies and propaganda …
So you mean to say Indian government has never and will never lie or try to hide facts from its public in election year? Are you really thay naive or do you consider us that naive? On one hand, Pakistan is so weak and fragile and on the other, you portray it as a powerful state with great psy-ops machinery.. Why are you making us all confused? Can’t we raise geniune questions or shortcomings in our Indian government narrative now?
And, how do we confirm that you are not part of an Indian psy-ops launched to confuse us even more?
(Of course assuming I am the typical anti-national)
It seems Indian govt deliberately downplayed the attack. When Sushma Swaraj went to China, it was portrayed as a defensive strike against militants and it wasn’t a military strike. The PM didn’t speak or release a statement about the successful, operation, all of these seems to be deliberate choices and doesn’t look like mistakes. We can only make a guess for the reason, only the decision makers would know the real reason. It seems plausible, with the strike they sent the message to Pakistan and didn’t want to gloat about to give Pakistan a face saver, so that this doesn’t escalate any further. What do I know, but this seems the most plausible answer, wonder why none of the high and mighty journalist thought of this option
I wish someone from India could tell truth to Indian Nation. It is totally biased article with a clear tilt to sell IAF narrative.
Dear Rubina, The same to you, someone in Pakistan to unpack the pack of lies by Pakistani propaganda
1. IAF bombing at Balakot: Pak did not accept any damage other than trees, then why they cordon off the area for 15 days after strike and not allowed any media person ????
2. F16: Pak did not accept using it, then from where ARAAM missile part came ? They also did not accept F16 downing by a MIG (which itself was downed later in dogfight) Then how F16 wing commander Shahzaz ud din died ? Lynched after ejecting from falling F16 hit by R73 missile from MIG Bison, people gone by Pak propagande and thought him to be an Indian pilot and lynched him.
3. What is the mystery of the second captured Indian Pilot claimed by Pak TV but rejected by Pak defence official later ? Actually, he was the 2nd twin sitter fallen F16 pilot, died by falling ….
GET AWARE RUBINA, YOUR ENTIRE NATION is sitting on Pak lies and propaganda …
So you mean to say Indian government has never and will never lie or try to hide facts from its public in election year? Are you really thay naive or do you consider us that naive? On one hand, Pakistan is so weak and fragile and on the other, you portray it as a powerful state with great psy-ops machinery.. Why are you making us all confused? Can’t we raise geniune questions or shortcomings in our Indian government narrative now?
And, how do we confirm that you are not part of an Indian psy-ops launched to confuse us even more?
(Of course assuming I am the typical anti-national)
Reporting at zenith. The singular achievement by India was that its forces intruded in Pakistan, leave aside the PoK areas.