Supreme Court has observed it is not just govt’s legal duty but constitutional duty to protect all places of worship, under a 1991 Act which excludes Ayodhya.
The test raises a question. Why have Russian nuclear strategists now invested in the Burevestnik, when the US abandoned nuclear ramjet propulsion in 1964?
Tajikistan did not want to extend the lease because of apparent pressure from Russia & China over non-regional military personnel at the air base, it is learnt.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
What was brought in by a constitutional amendment (secularism, as a policy of state during the Emergency ), can be gotten rid of with another constitutional amendment…it’s all about a matter of time, and opportunity.
What if the majority of the people of the countruy want their places of worship Kashi & Mathura to be unadulterated by structures from Arabic religion and where the tryant Truk-Arabic-Mongol rulers have publicly placed plaques writings that the Hindu structure was destroyed intentionally for showing the might of Arabic religion. Why in India we need to protect these Arabic structures to crumple our own fundamental right to practise a pluralistic culture. Infact we are safeguarding the rights of a monthestic and a political and barbaric version of that Arabic tradition which proclaims their hatred in their everday prayers for non-believers of their religion.
I had always supported a legal resolution for all property disputes, including the Ayodhya issue, and am glad that the issue was finally resolved legally. However, thanks to the BJP’s political ambitions, Kashi and Mathura temples cannot be restored now as the SC has declared their protection a part of the unalterable fundamental structure of constitution. This is sad to me as a history-loving, Shiva bhakt, Odia brahmana as, unlike Ayodhya, there is documented proof of Aurangzeb destroying temples at these locations to build mosques. The truth is that Shiva bhakts and Krushna bhakts, not Muslims, will be second-rate citizens in this country. This is ironic as Rama himself was a Shiva bhakt.
How long will it take for a majoritarian Govt to amend this law or nullify it. I dont think 1991 act can deter organisations like RSS VHP to hold back and not to repeat Babri again.
But why dont you willingly return the places… if any doubt google the gyanvapi mosque image at Kashi. The image itself is the proof that the place is not a mosque (as per Islam).
Why……. Your ancestor demolished our temple and now you are justifying the law. One sided tolerance have left us in ruins in the past.
Why……. Your ancestor demolished our temple and now you are justifying the law. One sided tolerance have left us in ruins in the past.
The law did not stop the demolition of the mosque and will not stop the HIndutva from doing it again because the Supreme Court gave in to the mob of India!
It Will Somewhere Lead To Civil War.
What was brought in by a constitutional amendment (secularism, as a policy of state during the Emergency ), can be gotten rid of with another constitutional amendment…it’s all about a matter of time, and opportunity.
What if Kashi and Mathura too are made exceptions to the 1991 law?
What if the majority of the people of the countruy want their places of worship Kashi & Mathura to be unadulterated by structures from Arabic religion and where the tryant Truk-Arabic-Mongol rulers have publicly placed plaques writings that the Hindu structure was destroyed intentionally for showing the might of Arabic religion. Why in India we need to protect these Arabic structures to crumple our own fundamental right to practise a pluralistic culture. Infact we are safeguarding the rights of a monthestic and a political and barbaric version of that Arabic tradition which proclaims their hatred in their everday prayers for non-believers of their religion.
I had always supported a legal resolution for all property disputes, including the Ayodhya issue, and am glad that the issue was finally resolved legally. However, thanks to the BJP’s political ambitions, Kashi and Mathura temples cannot be restored now as the SC has declared their protection a part of the unalterable fundamental structure of constitution. This is sad to me as a history-loving, Shiva bhakt, Odia brahmana as, unlike Ayodhya, there is documented proof of Aurangzeb destroying temples at these locations to build mosques. The truth is that Shiva bhakts and Krushna bhakts, not Muslims, will be second-rate citizens in this country. This is ironic as Rama himself was a Shiva bhakt.
How long will it take for a majoritarian Govt to amend this law or nullify it. I dont think 1991 act can deter organisations like RSS VHP to hold back and not to repeat Babri again.
But why dont you willingly return the places… if any doubt google the gyanvapi mosque image at Kashi. The image itself is the proof that the place is not a mosque (as per Islam).
Why……. Your ancestor demolished our temple and now you are justifying the law. One sided tolerance have left us in ruins in the past.
Why……. Your ancestor demolished our temple and now you are justifying the law. One sided tolerance have left us in ruins in the past.
The law did not stop the demolition of the mosque and will not stop the HIndutva from doing it again because the Supreme Court gave in to the mob of India!