Advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the lead petitioner and the All India Sunni Waqf Board, told the Supreme Court that he was being put through "torture" in assisting with the case.
Nirmohi Akhara, one of the claimants to the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site, said just offering prayers couldn’t be taken as joint Hindu-Muslim possession.
Research paper, however, finds lowest indebtedness level among Muslims at 12.3% & highest among Hindus at 14.9%. Overall national financial inclusion level at 87.2%, indebtedness at 14.7%.
Fresh details of operation conducted by IAF, Army have come out in gazette notification giving citations of those who were awarded Vir Chakra for their bravery.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
Won’t work. The issue merits closure with the delivery of a landmark judgment by the apex court. After that, a deer park, devoted to the ideals of Lord Buddha, should come up, an enclave of ahimsa and enlightenment.
The enough areas for buddha park elsewhere, that place is considered as birth place, & only temple will be constructed.
Not only SC should not look at another mediation attempt but it must give its judgment on the title dispute of the plot of land expeditiously. Whatever Government has to do after its judgment is another matter and politics will decide if government takes over the land or whatever follows thereafter. If this brief is clear, then it should not wander into issues of faith such as did Ram exist? How to prove he was born at that spot? etc. Let not wisdom of SC be wasted on these issues. Overall, the issue is simple- any structure built by or anything associated with a foreign ruler in India is a potential case for demolition, name change etc. and the collateral issues are to be managed in a civic way. Faith or ethnicity of such ruler is immaterial.
If this thesis is accepted, North and South Block, Rashtrapati Bhavan and Parliament House should be demolished, the CPWD should be tasked with drawing up plans for proper sarkari construction, awarded to L 1.
I said “potential case for demolition” and for not “fit case for demolition”!! The structures mentioned above are well accepted and indianized (read hinduized, if you so wish) since long.!!
Buddha? Are you insane? It is believed by Hindus to be Ram’s birthplace.
Funny thing , if ‘supreme’ wisdom could not resolve it in so many years , how is it ‘supreme ‘?
Won’t work. The issue merits closure with the delivery of a landmark judgment by the apex court. After that, a deer park, devoted to the ideals of Lord Buddha, should come up, an enclave of ahimsa and enlightenment.
The enough areas for buddha park elsewhere, that place is considered as birth place, & only temple will be constructed.
Not only SC should not look at another mediation attempt but it must give its judgment on the title dispute of the plot of land expeditiously. Whatever Government has to do after its judgment is another matter and politics will decide if government takes over the land or whatever follows thereafter. If this brief is clear, then it should not wander into issues of faith such as did Ram exist? How to prove he was born at that spot? etc. Let not wisdom of SC be wasted on these issues. Overall, the issue is simple- any structure built by or anything associated with a foreign ruler in India is a potential case for demolition, name change etc. and the collateral issues are to be managed in a civic way. Faith or ethnicity of such ruler is immaterial.
If this thesis is accepted, North and South Block, Rashtrapati Bhavan and Parliament House should be demolished, the CPWD should be tasked with drawing up plans for proper sarkari construction, awarded to L 1.
I said “potential case for demolition” and for not “fit case for demolition”!! The structures mentioned above are well accepted and indianized (read hinduized, if you so wish) since long.!!