Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray apologised to Shiv Sainiks whose seats went to alliance partners. He also called for a special law to build the Ram temple in Ayodhya.
CM Adityanath had earlier said there would be "very good news", but later dismissed it to say he was talking about a 'deepotsav' to be held in Ayodhya on Diwali.
From wondering if there was ever any legal question asked over birth of Christ to looking for Lord Ram's descendants, SC has dealt with many odd questions.
Neither state govts nor companies earn large profits from lotteries. However, a look at the system shows there’s ample evidence of murky dealings and financial irregularities.
In an interview with Gulistan News this week, Union Home Minister Amit Shah said the government would leave law and order to J&K Police and slowly withdraw troops.
The ‘idea’ Kejriwal's politics grew around was a no-holds-barred fight against corruption. That is the reason Modi govt has now tarred him and his entire party with the same paint.
My God! Can one amend history? History is that which has happened. How do you change something that has already happened? If there are different accounts written by historians who were more or less contemporary to the incidents that are recorded, then you can choose one of the two or three such versions, that’s fine. Important phrase is, “more or less contemporary”, because the incident is likely to have been fresh in the memory of the scribe or historian. That’s understandable. But you cannot CREATE a version two hundred or three hundred years later!
Amit Shah and the rest of the RSS clan must remember that Karl Marx was not even born in the period whose historical accounts they find objectionable. There were no leftist or rightist historians in that period, when that bit of history was happening. They were just responsible people who wrote what they saw.
My God! Can one amend history? History is that which has happened. How do you change something that has already happened? If there are different accounts written by historians who were more or less contemporary to the incidents that are recorded, then you can choose one of the two or three such versions, that’s fine. Important phrase is, “more or less contemporary”, because the incident is likely to have been fresh in the memory of the scribe or historian. That’s understandable. But you cannot CREATE a version two hundred or three hundred years later!
Amit Shah and the rest of the RSS clan must remember that Karl Marx was not even born in the period whose historical accounts they find objectionable. There were no leftist or rightist historians in that period, when that bit of history was happening. They were just responsible people who wrote what they saw.