The Indian Army HQ claimed in a paper that the reforms proposed by Indian Army chief General Bipin Rawat would usher in a 'revolution in military affairs'.
Once seen as a fading presence on India’s investment & startup picture, the state is slowly moving up the ladder, with policy reforms & infrastructure building.
Agreement signed during 17th Joint Working Group (JWG) on defence cooperation. Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh met Director General in Israeli Ministry of Defence Amir Baram Tuesday.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
I guess no other work for army chiefs and other chiefs…. Started polluting even defence….. If sudden war and shortage comes then….they will be knowing the value of… People these thoughts wont be helpful in any way whih are coming if the defence sector is clean …. Hearted and why don’t the aged chiefs.. take retirement and give chance to new cadre… They might come with some innovative thoughts.. which will be helpful for our country
They can claim what ever they want but that is not going to change the fact that the people who preceded the current Chief were not fools. They were of same mettle as Gen Rawat think he is made of. So the strength was developed for a two front war with Pakistan and China. What will happen if he (Gen Rawat) in his exuberance cuts the Army strength and we have a war tommorow with our friendly Neighbourhood tommorow. As such we are having a Meager Defence budget as compared to our adversaries and also we want a world power tag. Then we say strength of Army is too much and Defence budget is eaten up by the strength in Payment of dues to Soldiers. What about Ministry of Defence strength (The Civilian Strength working). It is galactic as compared to size of troops they serve. Moreover they serve their awn agenda. What about Massive MESS organisation of Civilians who are also paid out of defence budget. They are almost double the strength of the Army strength. We should first try and apply economics to these people and they proceed to a structure (Army) which has grown after a lot of trial and error, and not merely sit in cushy offices and start forming imaginary theories.
I guess no other work for army chiefs and other chiefs…. Started polluting even defence….. If sudden war and shortage comes then….they will be knowing the value of… People these thoughts wont be helpful in any way whih are coming if the defence sector is clean …. Hearted and why don’t the aged chiefs.. take retirement and give chance to new cadre… They might come with some innovative thoughts.. which will be helpful for our country
They can claim what ever they want but that is not going to change the fact that the people who preceded the current Chief were not fools. They were of same mettle as Gen Rawat think he is made of. So the strength was developed for a two front war with Pakistan and China. What will happen if he (Gen Rawat) in his exuberance cuts the Army strength and we have a war tommorow with our friendly Neighbourhood tommorow. As such we are having a Meager Defence budget as compared to our adversaries and also we want a world power tag. Then we say strength of Army is too much and Defence budget is eaten up by the strength in Payment of dues to Soldiers. What about Ministry of Defence strength (The Civilian Strength working). It is galactic as compared to size of troops they serve. Moreover they serve their awn agenda. What about Massive MESS organisation of Civilians who are also paid out of defence budget. They are almost double the strength of the Army strength. We should first try and apply economics to these people and they proceed to a structure (Army) which has grown after a lot of trial and error, and not merely sit in cushy offices and start forming imaginary theories.