The Indian Army HQ claimed in a paper that the reforms proposed by Indian Army chief General Bipin Rawat would usher in a 'revolution in military affairs'.
By turning a blind eye to the snakes in his own backyard, Trudeau is setting the stage for a disaster of epic proportions for his country, his people, and the world at large.
In Episode 1544 of CutTheClutter, Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta looks at some top economists pointing to the pitfalls of ‘currency nationalism’ with data from 1991 to 2004.
While there are patrolling points (PP) 10, 11, 12, 12A and 13 in the Depsang Plains, the patrol in the region Monday was carried out to only one point as decided by India and China.
While we talk much about our military, we don’t put our national wallet where our mouth is. Nobody is saying we should double our defence spending, but current declining trend must be reversed.
I guess no other work for army chiefs and other chiefs…. Started polluting even defence….. If sudden war and shortage comes then….they will be knowing the value of… People these thoughts wont be helpful in any way whih are coming if the defence sector is clean …. Hearted and why don’t the aged chiefs.. take retirement and give chance to new cadre… They might come with some innovative thoughts.. which will be helpful for our country
They can claim what ever they want but that is not going to change the fact that the people who preceded the current Chief were not fools. They were of same mettle as Gen Rawat think he is made of. So the strength was developed for a two front war with Pakistan and China. What will happen if he (Gen Rawat) in his exuberance cuts the Army strength and we have a war tommorow with our friendly Neighbourhood tommorow. As such we are having a Meager Defence budget as compared to our adversaries and also we want a world power tag. Then we say strength of Army is too much and Defence budget is eaten up by the strength in Payment of dues to Soldiers. What about Ministry of Defence strength (The Civilian Strength working). It is galactic as compared to size of troops they serve. Moreover they serve their awn agenda. What about Massive MESS organisation of Civilians who are also paid out of defence budget. They are almost double the strength of the Army strength. We should first try and apply economics to these people and they proceed to a structure (Army) which has grown after a lot of trial and error, and not merely sit in cushy offices and start forming imaginary theories.
I guess no other work for army chiefs and other chiefs…. Started polluting even defence….. If sudden war and shortage comes then….they will be knowing the value of… People these thoughts wont be helpful in any way whih are coming if the defence sector is clean …. Hearted and why don’t the aged chiefs.. take retirement and give chance to new cadre… They might come with some innovative thoughts.. which will be helpful for our country
They can claim what ever they want but that is not going to change the fact that the people who preceded the current Chief were not fools. They were of same mettle as Gen Rawat think he is made of. So the strength was developed for a two front war with Pakistan and China. What will happen if he (Gen Rawat) in his exuberance cuts the Army strength and we have a war tommorow with our friendly Neighbourhood tommorow. As such we are having a Meager Defence budget as compared to our adversaries and also we want a world power tag. Then we say strength of Army is too much and Defence budget is eaten up by the strength in Payment of dues to Soldiers. What about Ministry of Defence strength (The Civilian Strength working). It is galactic as compared to size of troops they serve. Moreover they serve their awn agenda. What about Massive MESS organisation of Civilians who are also paid out of defence budget. They are almost double the strength of the Army strength. We should first try and apply economics to these people and they proceed to a structure (Army) which has grown after a lot of trial and error, and not merely sit in cushy offices and start forming imaginary theories.