They said they fell in love and decided to live together. Of the 12 couples, seven women were Muslim residing with Hindu men, while five women were Hindu living with Muslim men.
Justice Bhatia says SC’s remarks have had a ‘chilling effect’ on him. He sought a roster change as debate widens to judicial independence & pendency in one of India’s busiest HCs.
Accused of a 1982 murder involving a land dispute, Dhani Ram was in his 50s when he was convicted. His challenge to the trial court conviction has been pending for over 40 years.
Official says ED will move SC against Allahabad HC order. Case pertains to allegations against Satinder Singh Bhasin, former MD of Bhasin Infotech and Infrastructure (BIIPL).
While Justice Rajiv Gupta ruled in favour of acquittal of the accused, Justice Harvir Singh partially affirmed 2022 order of trial court, convicting & sentencing them to death.
Koli’s counsel said this is the second instance in Indian judicial history where the Supreme Court has acquitted a death row convict after the dismissal of a review petition.
At 2nd such summit in Punjab for top investors organised by AAP since it came to power in Punjab, Lakshmi Mittal announced his Bathinda refinery has increased production of LPG by 3,000 tonnes/day.
The Nirouyeh Vijeh Pasdaran Velayat, or NOPO, was the only force Ali Khamenei trusted.It was founded in 1991 and is more feared than the Revolutionary Guards.
Trump has ushered in the age of humiliation. His method is to push around America’s friends rudely and publicly. He knows none of them can afford to fight back.
Wrong? The Allahabad High Court seems to have taken a very narrow view of the issue. By focusing only on whether a formal conversion had happened, it sidestepped the larger concern about vulnerability, coercion, and the real-world fallout that sometimes emerges in such cases.
Protecting adult choice is important—but so is acknowledging patterns of misuse if they exist. The judgment reads idealistic, almost clinical, as if social tensions and documented instances of exploitation are irrelevant unless neatly packaged into an FIR. A court can defend liberty without appearing oblivious to ground realities—and that balance feels missing here.
Wrong? The Allahabad High Court seems to have taken a very narrow view of the issue. By focusing only on whether a formal conversion had happened, it sidestepped the larger concern about vulnerability, coercion, and the real-world fallout that sometimes emerges in such cases.
Protecting adult choice is important—but so is acknowledging patterns of misuse if they exist. The judgment reads idealistic, almost clinical, as if social tensions and documented instances of exploitation are irrelevant unless neatly packaged into an FIR. A court can defend liberty without appearing oblivious to ground realities—and that balance feels missing here.