Bahrain couple, who adopted 8-year old girl from Bhopal adoption agency Udaan in July, now wants to send her back as she is displaying 'violent behaviour'.
Former CEO Howard Schultz once told shareholders those who opposed his support of same-sex marriage were free to invest elsewhere. But now, CEO Brian Niccol seems to be selling Starbucks as a place that just, well, sells coffee.
New CPI series will take 2024 as base year, will provide more accurate measure of inflation, spending on digital services. Expected to enhance representation and reliability, says Saurabh Garg.
Tajikistan did not want to extend the lease because of apparent pressure from Russia & China over non-regional military personnel at the air base, it is learnt.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
What was wrong with the surrogacy scheme which this government abolished? Consider the benefits of that method:
1) The “parent” couple would get the child which was “half” their own anyway
2) they would get a new born, and not an 8 or 5 year old child who would take time to “adopt” them as parents
3) the surrogate mother would get the financial benefit all for herself rather than the agent parking away major chunk for himself
4) the government could take the initiative and control all such requests for surrogacy through its own offices abroad, thus completely rooting out any role of dubious agents
5) by directly controlling surrogacy traffic, government would also ensure that a woman wasn’t “over using” herself thereby affecting the baby’s and her own health
6) last but not the least, cases of “child thefts” will reduce drastically if no one has the incentive to “sell” a child to someone.
Government can still reconsider their decision. “Agents” are the curse of every business.
What was wrong with the surrogacy scheme which this government abolished? Consider the benefits of that method:
1) The “parent” couple would get the child which was “half” their own anyway
2) they would get a new born, and not an 8 or 5 year old child who would take time to “adopt” them as parents
3) the surrogate mother would get the financial benefit all for herself rather than the agent parking away major chunk for himself
4) the government could take the initiative and control all such requests for surrogacy through its own offices abroad, thus completely rooting out any role of dubious agents
5) by directly controlling surrogacy traffic, government would also ensure that a woman wasn’t “over using” herself thereby affecting the baby’s and her own health
6) last but not the least, cases of “child thefts” will reduce drastically if no one has the incentive to “sell” a child to someone.
Government can still reconsider their decision. “Agents” are the curse of every business.