scorecardresearch
Thursday, April 25, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionWhy the Gunjan Saxena film is not just bad but a national...

Why the Gunjan Saxena film is not just bad but a national embarrassment

In episode 550 of #CutTheClutter, Shekhar Gupta explains why Gunjan Saxena: The Kargil Girl is an example of atrocious film-making.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Indian film industry has made many films about Kargil but those have been fictional. The Jhanvi Kapoor starrer and Sharan Sharma directorial — Gunjan Saxena: The Kargil Girl on Netflix — features something that is close to real life or close to real incidents.

It also mentions the name of a person involved in those incidents. In such cases, there have to be some limitations to how much liberty one can take with the facts, ThePrint’s Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta said in episode 550 of #CutTheClutter.

The movie trivialised the Indian Air Force, and it’s not so much the gender politics of the film, he said, adding that it is simply bad movie-making and shows very low IQ. It’s subtitle should be — you must never join the armed forces if you are a woman, Gupta said.

The first batch of flying women candidates was recruited in 1994. So it’s not as if somebody was the first in 1999 — which is when Kargil took place — as a lot of women were already flying for the Indian Air Force.

Moreover, the recruitment process in the film is made to look arbitrary and crude, Gupta said. Those interviews now are not taken by two officers and there’s always a psychologist, when final selections are to be made. Unlike what has been shown in the movie, medical examinations do not take place the same day and while one may have gotten selected at the end of a trial, one is not told so because similar trials are held with groups all over the country.

The film’s gender politics, where Kapoor’s character is shown to have been treated unequally with sorties getting cancelled, no toilets for women and many others, are far from reality, Gupta said, adding that the fictional representation of the brother-sister relationship in the film is also an insult to the viewers’ intelligence.

Pointing out that Cheetah helicopters were not involved in combat, none of them were shot down during Kargil, and no pilots were taken hostage, he said the film it’s also unfair and unkind to those who actually suffered casualties and those who actually exposed themselves to danger in combat.

Very few films based on military issues remain true to fact, and the Air Force complaining about it is justifiable, Gupta said. He also mentioned how the folklore has extended to the point where many known publications have reported that Saxena has won a Shaurya Chakra, which she has not.

The Vicky Kaushal starrer Uri: The Surgical Strike was also fictionalised, but because it suited the government and the armed forces, they adopted it, said Gupta. Similarly, he said, Sunny Deol’s Border was also fictionalised. “India hasn’t really made a great military history film, the closest we came was Haqeeqat (1964).”

A stirring speech in Nagaland

In the episode, Gupta also spoke about Nagaland Governor R.N. Ravi’s Independence Day addresses in which the latter used strong language. He said Ravi reminded Naga people that they have missed the peace dividend because of some vested interests. Some Naga insurgent leaders have been in Delhi, asking for the removal of the governor — who’s the chief negotiator interlocutor at the Centre’s behalf.

The problem is that these insurgent groups have not done much fighting in a very long time, for a couple of decades in fact, and they have acquired big vested interests and structures where they are now extorting in the name of what they call tax collection, said Gupta. Nagaland’s sovereignty, its own flag and constitution was never on the table and here the governor is right, he said.

Dhoni retires, Chauhan passes away

Moving onto cricket and M.S. Dhoni’s retirement, Gupta said how the former captain cool was the first genuine small town character who took over Indian cricket and gave everybody the belief that you could come into the national cricket team from small towns, and become rich and famous.

Dhoni was also someone completely divorced from the coaching manual, and brought in unconventional cricketers, he added.

While India has been doing well in Test matches, they have not won any ICC trophy since Dhoni retired. So the last ICC trophy India won is the Champions Cup in 2013.

Cricketer and UP minister Chetan Chauhan died due to Covid-related complications at Gurugram’s Medanta Hospital Sunday. Gupta recalled how the “very courageous cricketer” was the most successful opening partner with Sunil Gavaskar. He partnered Gavaskar in 59 innings. In those days, when not that many Test matches were played, Chauhan scored more than 3,000 runs while opening with Gavaskar. He, however, never scored a Test hundred.

Watch the latest episode of CTC here:

 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

10 COMMENTS

  1. I think this nepotis bit is gone too far …its crude how you can put down an actress to such trolls..when in actuality the ovie was good..show e one perfect ovie …just because its dhara productions you can t hsave any excuse to pull th ovie down like this…sad even you have to stoop to such levels

  2. Wish the emphasis was more on her training jungle and snow survival rather awards she received rather than petty things like bathrooms and all….not just IAF women faces such challenges when she enters any Field which is predominantly male dominated , even me being electrical engineer had to visit sites for comissioning where I was the only female ….but I never complained because I have chose to do so!!! Just to show someone good they need not tarnish the reputation of a prestigious organization like IAF where lot of them look up to. She accepted that she was given equal opportunity but why did they show her sorties were cancelled. Some sense should have been by movie makers in portraying things.

  3. Atleast you should have checked the facts before writing anything. You are the Editor-in-chief for God’s sake.
    I have lost all respect for The Print.

  4. Y would u print such a repressive and conceitful article?
    I respected this news platform.
    The claims written are not even facts, the women joined airforce ofcourse! But the first woman to fly for a combat mission, to a combat field is her, and that is just a fact, a fact declared and rewarded by our own army force…how is that to be questioned?

  5. Y would u print such crap? I respected this news platform.
    The claims written are not even facts, the women joined airforce ofcourse! But the first woman to fly for a combat mission, to a combat field is her, and that is just a fact, a fact declared and rewarded by our own army force…how is that to be questioned?

  6. For me what is more embarrassing is the Media in India. How they are competing with each other to spread their own propaganda and lies.. At least in Gunjan Saxena movie they had a disclaimer in the beginning that they took cinematic liberties for entertainment.. its only a movie and not a documentary…

  7. I have neither seen the movie nor have I gone through the issues that people have with it. I suspect much of the opposition might be to the new demon of nepo kids that the actress in the movie represents, Perhaps the issue are not directed to Sexana herself.

  8. ‘Gunjan Saxena’ film – afterall it is a Karan Johar production. Perhaps, a collusion between Johar and Bonnie Kapoor to keep the latter’s daughter’s career alive. Overall shallow movie.

  9. Regarding Nagaland, it is high time the Govt released the Framework AGreement for public knowledge.
    How are we to be sure that “shared sovereignty” and flag and Constitution were not discussed , even indirectly ?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular