scorecardresearch
Friday, March 29, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeOpinionMadras High Court making khula valid isn't enough without codifying Muslim personal...

Madras High Court making khula valid isn’t enough without codifying Muslim personal law

Muslim personal laws are, by nature, discriminatory towards women. While the Muslim Women Act 2019 was one step forward, now there's a need to codify personal laws.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

In November 2022, the Kerala High Court held a remarkable judgment stating that Muslim women have the absolute right to divorce their husbands without taking their consent — a type of divorce known as khula in sharia. The court dismissed a review petition filed by a man challenging the divorce granted to his wife under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939. The husband asserted that the divorce was not absolute and was different from talaq.

Earlier this month, the Madras High Court followed suit, ruling that Muslim women have the right to terminate marriage through khula (which is different from talaq, where both partners consent to divorce). The HC also asserted in a separate hearing that it could only be granted by a statutory court.

The absurd and unfair idea that a Muslim man can divorce his wife at will while the woman’s right to break the marriage is subject to the husband’s consent is widely accepted among Indian Muslims. The Kerala and Madras high courts have challenged the status quo. It is a necessary change in light of the Islamic clergy’s misogynistic interpretation of sharia.

Having moved one step forward, there’s still, however, a question that needs to be addressed. Will talaq also come under the purview of statutory bodies? The Madras High Court asserted in a separate hearing that only family courts can grant khula and not private sharia councils. The same court, in 2017, had ruled that Muslim clerics have no authority to issue divorce certificates

If talaq indeed also comes under the State’s purview, then procedures for Muslim men should also be clarified.

Moreover, what will be the role of sharia councils in society if statutory bodies are made the sole authority on divorce? A clear set of guidelines should be provided, and councils should be instructed not to handle matters related to divorce, maintenance, and inheritance.


Also read: Why BJP didn’t want PM Modi’s words about Pasmandas, Bohras, and Church to come…


A wide spectrum of discrimination

Although it appears that the courts are doing their best to be fairer toward Muslim women, it may not be of much use if the law itself is discriminatory. As far as Muslim civil matters are concerned, they are governed by Muslim personal laws, which are not in line with ideas of gender equality. Men can practise polygamy and divorce their wives unilaterally. Until 2019, when the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act was passed, men could even practise instant triple talaq. According to Muslim inheritance laws, a son inherits double the share of a daughter; a wife receives one-eighth share of the deceased husband’s wealth if she has children and one-fourth if she does not, whereas the husband receives one-fourth share of the wife’s wealth if he has children and half if he does not.

Furthermore, guardianship (hizanat) law discriminates against women — mothers are not regarded as natural guardians of their children. While they can retain custody when the child is a minor, the ultimate hizanat lies with the father who is deemed responsible for the child’s welfare.

It’s evident that such laws not only reflect patriarchal ideologies but also violate fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution. And this is just the tip of the iceberg — there’s an even wider spectrum of discrimination in Muslim personal laws.

Go beyond the 2019 Act

Prior to the introduction of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act 2019, women were subjected to oral and written threats of talaq, even over electronic devices. There was a big legal vacuum that further disadvantaged Muslim women. By outlawing instant triple talaq and making inclusions for maintenance and custody, the Act became the first step in the right direction. But there is a need to do more to safeguard women, especially where the societal setup is patriarchal.

As much as I appreciate courts’ decisions and amendments in Muslim family law, it is imperative to make fundamental, not superficial, changes to achieve gender equality. Muslim law needs to be codified and sharia councils must be given strict guidelines to ensure that they do not act as a parallel judiciary. In this regard, the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) can help Muslim women who are looking for justice but are too scared to speak up. Societal interference will be minimised and each citizen will get equal treatment before the law.

Amana Begam Ansari is a columnist, writer, and TV News Panelist. She also runs a weekly YouTube show called ‘India This Week by Amana and Khalid’. She tweets @Amana_Ansari. Views are personal.

(Edited by Humra Laeeq)

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular