Saturday, January 28, 2023
HomeOpinionIran’s Qassem Soleimani was on Bush and Obama’s kill list too but...

Iran’s Qassem Soleimani was on Bush and Obama’s kill list too but Trump went for the attack

Top Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani whom Donald Trump ordered killed was trained to disregard human lives.

Text Size:

The first reactions from Iran to the killing of its commander General Qassem Soleimani in a US air raid ordered by President Donald Trump, has been one of fury, promising ‘severe revenge’ and retaliation. But Iran’s room for manoeuvre is severely restricted, and what we hear coming out of Tehran is merely impotent rage.

Who was Qassem Soleimani

In terms of power he wielded, Qassem Soleimani was the de facto viceroy of Iran, Iraq, and Syria, second only to supreme leader Ali Khamenei. In many ways, he was the “Shia Crescent” – a term used for the rise of Shia governments opposing Sunni monarchies. That crescent was crafted in large part by Soleimani’s unique understanding of Iran’s weaknesses and strengths, and driven by his deep fanaticism.

As a young man, Soleimani had participated in, and was deeply influenced by, Operation Fath ol-Mobin, the turning point of the Iran-Iraq war. This particular assault was successful, because until then, the Iranians had fought on the back foot. The Imperial Iranian Forces had been the most technologically advanced in West Asia until the Shah’s departure in 1979 following the Iranian Revolution. It was staffed by excellent officers from the elite families of Iran. The subsequent purges of this elite meant that the officers chosen to replace them had no operational or command experience. This was when Iran turned to tactics like human wave attacks by massed infantry, and suicidal frontal assaults to liberate areas but at far greater human cost to Iranians than the enemy.

This is where Soleimani came to embrace a callous disregard for human life and never cringed from using it and fusing it with the Shia concept of ‘martyrdom’. He became the US and Israel’s greatest foe precisely because these two countries were sensitive to human losses. At the martyrs’ cemetery opposite Ayatollah Khomeini’s mausoleum in Teheran, which I visited in 2018, the caretaker told me that, according to his estimate, about 7,000-8,000 bodies had come from Syria, a sign of how inured to loss Iran had become as a society. But not everyone had.

In 2006, when Hezbollah’s abduction of Israeli soldiers triggered a full-fledged Israeli invasion, Hezbollah, using Soleimani’s tactics, fought the Israeli military to a standstill. The campaign was considered a failure by Israel, and a huge success for Hezbollah, but the Lebanese, unlike the Iranians, had no stomach for such massive human losses. Despite this, Hezbollah had no choice but to join Assad in Syria under Soleimani’s command, because much of its military strength depended on geographical contiguity through Syria and Iraq with Iran.

Also read: Soleimani’s killing: Iran’s Rouhani vows revenge, Trump waves US flag, war clouds gather

Why was Qassem Soleimani killed now 

If killing him had been off the table for much of George Bush and Barack Obama’s presidency, Donald Trump decided to change Soleimani’s calculus, the same way Soleimani had upended the US-Israeli calculus. My sources in Washington DC told me that eliminating Soleimani had been on the table for a while. Working with flight schedules from and into Syria, US intelligence had figured out the code words used for Soleimani’s travel at some point in 2013. Initial reports seem confused about how many people were killed, but it turns out that there was some kind of a mini-conference of Shia militia leaders at Baghdad airport Friday morning. The US airstrike was clearly a planned decapitation of the Shia militias.

The reason Soleimani wasn’t assassinated earlier is twofold: first was Obama’s refusal to escalate, given that he needed to bring Iran to the table and for the Iran nuclear deal to succeed. Israel and Saudi Arabia’s fury at the Obama nuclear deal was understandable as they were being forced to accept Iranian sponsored terror and sub-conventional actions, effectively footing the tab for Iranian restraint on the nuclear front. The deal was therefore accurately described by both countries as a “license for terror” given to Iran.

The second was after Trump took over. Despite withdrawing from the nuclear deal, he needed Syria pacified and realised that this could not be done without Bashar al-Assad winning the civil war – that is to say, for Soleimani to win the war for Assad. In a sense, it is the impending conclusion of the Syrian civil war and the almost assured victory of the Syrian government that made Soleimani dispensable for the US. Given both leverages – the nuclear deal and Syria – were no longer of any value to the US, the shield around Soleimani (and Iranian sub-conventional actions) disappeared.

Also read: How Modi govt’s budget could be affected by US air strikes to kill Iranian general

What Iran can do

There is little substance in Iranian fury. First, the US is technically on solid legal ground, having conducted proportionate retaliation for an attack by Iran-backed Shiite militias on its embassy compound in Baghdad. Second, Iran simply does not have the wherewithal to take on the US conventionally. Any conventional action by Iran will result in massive retaliation, with Trump itching to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Moreover, as the 1988 Operation Praying Mantis and the shooting down of Iran Air 655 flight demonstrated, the US can sink the Iranian Navy and shoot down a civil airliner with near-total impunity. With Iran’s forces severely stretched from Yemen, through Iraq and into Syria, there really are no viable options for retaliation by Iran; whatever retaliation happens will at best be a pinprick that will be easily absorbed and countered.

Iran could have retaliated through “sub-conventional” actions – the kind of terror or asymmetric warfare that Qassem Soleimani specialised in. But the 3 January US airstrike closed that option – with America clearly saying that if Iran engaged in terrorism against it, the US would escalate to the conventional level and target Iran’s leadership.

In short, the entire Iranian geopolitical playbook of the last 40 years just got thrown out of the window. All up: game, set and match trump.

The author is a senior fellow at the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies. He tweets @iyervval. Views are personal. 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. *lOL* Iran always replies. They just killed about 60+ soldiers in Ain al-Assad with Zulfiqar precision rockets. And using their advanced electronic warfare abilities downed the CIA plane in Afghanistan killing the head of Iran desk at CIA. That’s just one example.

    In the past too they have damaged the zionists viciously multiple times fold for retaliation. Why do you think NATO hasn’t invaded Iran for all these years?

    Abhijit lacks the understanding of West Asia and the global assymetrical war of Iran. This article is filled with dis-information and is a pathetic attempt at salivating at a fake victory by a wannabe western oriented Zionist India.

  2. Iran has been huffing and puffing for last 20 years, but being economically weaker, could not build a modern military force. The world has moved away from unconventional warfare like terrorism and used of militias. Even left wing extermism which was tolerated for some decades is now not supported.

    Iran is between a rock and hard place.

  3. Your assessment is far too optimistic. and underestimates the possibility of Iranian self-destruction. Iran will respond unconventionally which may lead to the end of the regime but America will waste massive treasure, lives and international credibility. War with Iran will be Pyrrhic for the USA.

  4. In this context , it is apt to refer readers to this Vedic astrology writer’s predictive alert of 11 November 2019 in article -“ Astrological probable alerts for 2020” – published in January 2020 issue of Wisdom Magazine Webzine on 1 January 2020 at The related text of the predictive alert in the said article reads as follows :-
    “ 1. This Vedic astrology writer has been predicting yearly alerts for more care and appropriate strategy in the United States for some years past , which have come out to be both meaningful and accurate. Such predictive alerts for 2019 published at were found to be as just said here before. Since the new year 2020 is coming soon , the same exercise has been gone into in relation to the US.
    Predictive Conclusions.
    3. The year 2020 opens with a baggage of concerns and hopes which shaped up in the year gone by. Compulsive expenses grow and some of the concerns turn worrisome calling for solution. These worrisome concerns appear to include strategic interests , something in the sea or oil world , agricultural sector , warfare environment and opponents in the global perspective as well. Assets or energy resources may need attention. Indications also suggest that the US would take wise , appropriate and matching measures to deal with the said worrisome concerns , resulting in some success during first three months of the year 2020. In other words , during about first three months of 2020 , some success or forward movement looks to be likely in national and international affairs with which the US may be engaged. Economy may show signs of forward movement , cooperation of some international groups looks to be becoming available , agricultural sector may get boost or strength , plans of warfare strategies or notable warfare stuff may meet with significant success”.
    It may thus be observed from the aforesaid predictions submitted by this writer on 11 November 2019 for publication , that these can be said to have turned precisely closer and accurate to the actual happenings on the ground on 31 December 2019 and 1 January 2020.

  5. Someone should tell shri ashok JI that if he comments on Trump’s affairs being an Indian citizen, he will not get a visa to the west. CIA may also come after him. His logic for others may come to haunt him. Also that he should get a part time job instead of writing inane comments on articles left right and centre.

  6. You bigot. Sick hindutva mind.
    Shaheed Qasim sulaimani was a respected commander of quds elite force which was responsible for defeating daesh and al nusrah. He was the sole person who had the courage to fight and also mobilize fighter’s to defeat terrorists.

    You just have a pathetic view…

  7. End of the day, he was a formal part of the Iranian state. There are military and intelligence officials in Pakistan who do things that are inimical to India’s security and interests. If they are treated as legitimate targets by our security establishment, we would start ascending the ladder to war. 2. The Iranians are bound to respond, claim ownership of the act, unlike the recent attack on Aramco facilities. That will provide President Trump justification for a more conventional military strike. 3. Both North Korea and Iran demonstrate the limitations / dangers of his form of diplomacy.

Comments are closed.