Representative image (Commons)
Text Size:

In 2017, mathematics education professor Rochelle Gutiérrez wrote that “mathematics operates as whiteness.” Word of this spread quickly, leading to a strong backlash of hate mail and offensive comments on Gutiérrez’s social media. This soundbite is often quoted without context, so here is some context:

“Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White. School mathematics curricula emphasizing terms like Pythagorean theorem and pi perpetuate a perception that mathematics was largely developed by Greeks and other Europeans. Perhaps more importantly, mathematics operates with unearned privilege in society, just like Whiteness.”

In this sense, at least in the US, one could certainly argue that mathematics operates as whiteness. In this blog, I would like to pose the question: Can mathematics do otherwise? Can mathematics be antiracist?

Last semester, I developed a class called Inequalities: Numbers and Justice, aimed towards non-majors. My students ranged from undergraduate seniors to students in the local high school, with majors ranging from Government to Chinese to Computer Science. It was the second incarnation of a course I had taught years ago, in which we worked through the ideas in Gutstein and Peterson’s Rethinking Mathematics: Teaching Social Justice by the Numbers, which was written at the middle-school level. In Inequalities, my hope was to develop these ideas into a college-level course.

Over the course of the semester, we explored how notions of fairness and equality have been considered from the point of view of mathematics and economics. What ways were these ideas defined, and given the definitions, how can they be measured? We covered topics ranging from the misuses of statistics to gerrymandering to racial capitalism and climate change. In the end, students were able to appreciate the complexities of fairness, the deep inequities that capitalism produces, and questioned the idea that mathematics is politically neutral.

Can mathematics, specifically beyond the K-12 level, be antiracist? Are critical mathematics pedagogy (the application of critical theory to mathematics education) and “higher” mathematics (college mathematics and beyond) necessarily in opposition to each other? Social justice is a popular phrase these days, even in mathematics circles, but what does it mean? In a recent volumeMathematics for Social Justice: Resources for the College Classroom, editors Gizem Karaali and Lily Khadjavi describe the work as part of a “national movement to include social justice material into mathematics teaching”. While the volume represents an important effort in bringing discussions around race, gender, class, and power into the college mathematics classroom, I am left wanting more.

Attempts to shoehorn social justice into mathematics curricula perhaps say more about the political leanings of the teacher than anything else. At the same time, we must be wary of diversity initiatives in mathematics which simply reproduce a different class of scientists that perpetuate structures of domination and oppression, in place of work to dismantle the whiteness which mathematics operates as, and to truly equip students for a world of growing inequality and climate catastrophe. After all, would it have been better if it were nonwhite people who developed the atomic bomb? Or the technology to surveil, incarcerate, and deport vulnerable communities?

These small-scale reforms to the system leave the larger problems of capitalism, imperialism, and white supremacy intact. As Piper H. wrote in an earlier post,

“Most of us do not have good role models for what a feminist math department would look like. I have this talk that I give and afterwards, I will often get concerned white men asking me what they can do to fight sexism. But they’re not really thinking about ending sexism. They’re thinking about progress. They want to know which benefits the cis male hoarders-of-power can offer to women so that we don’t feel so bad and complain so much and contribute to such dismal numbers. This is natural, reasonable even, but sexist all the same.”

Indeed, what would a feminist — an intersectional, anti-racist, and class-consciously feminist — math department look like?

Also read: The last place you think you will find a special math equation – rat whiskers

Should mathematics be antiracist?

Before we consider the question further, we ought to ask whether mathematics should be doing the work of social justice. Such questions have been asked for some time now in the physical sciences. See the update below.

To be certain, mathematics educators have thought long and hard about the ways in which mathematics education intersects with issues of race, gender, class, and power, at least since Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The teaching of mathematics is deeply embedded in politics, and inasmuch as some would prefer to view abstract mathematics as occurring in a vacuum, the social dimension of mathematics education has wide implications.

But what about the majority of college mathematics professors who are not trained in mathematics education but in mathematics? They are highly involved in the production of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors and the maintenance of power structures in college mathematics classrooms and departments. These mathematicians are not hired primarily based on their pedagogical ability, even at many liberal arts schools.

There are practical and cultural differences between research mathematics and mathematics education (let us admit this binary for the sake of discussion). One could say that mathematics education is concerned about the formation of mathematically literate students, the interplay between oppression, power, and privilege in the context of mathematics education, especially in K-12 settings; whereas in mathematics, we are concerned about mathematics qua mathematics, often as divorced from social reality (except as applied to the physical sciences and engineering). Indeed, in my field, number theory, it is a common boast that the solution of famous problems like Fermat’s Last Theorem are of no immediate practical use. Therefore, simply to attempt to have abstract and socially-engaged mathematics at the same time is to have a kind of a mathematical double-consciousness, and to attempt to bridge the two is a highly non-trivial endeavor.

Nonetheless, one thing is clear: if mathematics is political (and also racial and gendered), then we must be on the side of justice, whatever that may look like. In other words, if mathematics can be antiracist, then it ought to be.

Also read: RSS-linked outfit vouches for Vedic maths books that will make students forget calculators

Towards a critical research mathematics

Mathematics education research has made it clear that the teaching of mathematics is a highly political act. But what about the content of mathematics? In other words, what kind of “pure” mathematics might be useful for antiracist mathematics? Is that even the right question to ask? Can the abstractions in college mathematics and beyond, ideas from say, category theory, differential geometry, or abstract algebra open up new ways of critically approaching the social?

In Inequalities, we discussed applications of social choice theory, metric geometry, and random walks to gerrymandering. Some of this follows the work of Moon Duchin’s Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group (MGGG) at Tufts and MIT, which is doing exciting work, especially given the upcoming 2020 census. We debated Andrew Hacker’s controversial op-ed, Is Algebra Necessary?, which advocates for replacing the standard mathematics curriculum with “citizen statistics” that would “familiarize students with the kinds of numbers that describe and delineate our personal and public lives.”

We also spent time on fair division, a subfield of behavioral economics initially studied by mathematicians such as Hugo Steinhaus, which continues to hold the interest of mathematicians. More complicated fair division problems lead to matching problems in graph theory, for example the Gale-Shapley algorithm in the Stable Marriage problem. The latter was applied to the School Choice problem of matching students to schools, as described in the module. This is an example of a class of problems that construct simplified models of social reality, as one does in the physical sciences, in order to study it.

Another example is the Petrie multiplier, which describes a power law in a model of sexism. The model assumes that men and women are equally sexist, similar to the way that the Schelling model of segregation assumes that people are equally (non)racist, and simply prefer to be with their own kind. One might argue that this approach reveals mathematical laws that force certain phenomena to occur, without discussing how external factors might intervene in reality. Might it be possible for models of social phenomena to account for the complexities of race, gender, class, and nation?

I don’t pretend to have the answers to the questions I am asking. This small sampling suggests a handful of possibilities for mathematics as, say, an intersectional, anti-racist, and class-consciously feminist enterprise. In any case, if we can agree that mathematics can operate as whiteness, then we have a moral duty to ask how mathematics might be otherwise. There is much work left to do. With the strength of our combined mathematical creativity, what might we come up with if we dared to imagine?

Tian An Wong is Visiting Assistant Professor of Mathematics & Statistics at Smith College. Views are personal.

This article was first published on the American Mathematical Society’s blog.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism

15 Comments Share Your Views


  1. For God’s sake, you’re not arguing that math is racist. You’re arguing that math pedagogy and application are racist. Phrasing it as the first could be misinterpreted and dismantle STEM in the university, the other fits within the equity ideas that have already devalued the humanities. I have a feeling you’re hoping people can’t draw the distinction.

    • lol no…the best of math originate in india, get worldwide recognition from arabia and greece and the credits are taken by europe…africa isn’t in this equation

  2. It is really courageous with the kind of garbage you post (like this) and ask for donations to support your “journalism”.

  3. A while back when I first heard the statement “Math is Racist” I was certain someone was being very, very sarcastic. After reading this article attempting to show how math IS actually racist I know better. Not sarcastic, merely mentally disturbed. This is such garbage. How anyone can actually believe what is presented here concerns me. I do though see why todays graduates are so twisted in their thinking. Applying prejudice to everything & believing White Privilege exists in something as untouchable as mathematics is absurd. Go peddle your idiotic theories elswhere. Stop brainwashing young minds.

  4. So, language is important because using it precisely gets people to a common understanding of the issues involved. If I say, “Math is racist” I am saying that mathematical principles operate differently depending on the race of the user, which is a patently absurd thing to say. If I say, “the story about how Math principles were discovered is racist” I am saying that the math storytellers are telling an inaccurate story that denies the contributions of people of color. This could very well be true, a racism of ommission, if you will. If I say, “students of color cannot learn math as well as white students” then I may be making a racist statement if my intent is to say that because of race students of color cannot learn math as well as white students. If my intent is to say that the students of color in my class do not perform as well as white students I may be pointing to a few things, one, inequities emerging from the racial communities I teach or, two, that I am a racist teacher and I cannot teach children of color as well as I can teach white students.

    When I was in high school I had a teacher that said, “some of you will fail, and then become teachers.” Then, came the old saw, “some of you will be bigger failures and you will teach teachers how to teach.” It was a dark and unfair thing to say but the current flow from white professors in the schools of education is not helping their case. May I suggest, speak plainly about fairness to help others.

  5. When the Nazis came to power in Germany and Austria, they “cleaned” the so called “Jewish Mathematics” from universities. The German academic math never really discovered.
    Now there are people calling mathematics racist and “whiteness” thinking being modern and liberal…..

  6. To the doubters: Anti-racist mathematics is where students have to show their working out. Racist mathematics, on the other hand, is more concerned with the final solution.

    • So the ratio of a circle to it’s circumference is racist? I think we need to work more on our mental health system…

  7. Though a relief reading something apart from political justification but disgust to frame ‘queen of science’ in a bias.
    Mathematics is a language of science – only a mathematical equation describes instance in Nature. Imagine any stream of science strictly or only using respective elements?
    Though India has a legacy being ancestor of mathematics and thought – fell short of publicity and globally marketing. With Data science now proves application of thought to reality.

  8. How about you use that “feminist”, “anti-racist” and “non-white” math and built a machine based on its premise. In case it works, we’ll see how we proceed.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here