How government intervention is wrecking India’s banking system
Opinion

How government intervention is wrecking India’s banking system

A summary of Episode 407 of #CutTheClutter where Shekhar Gupta explains why the government should move out of India’s banking system.

Rupee (Representational image) | Dhiraj Singh | Bloomberg File photo

Representational image of Indian rupee | Dhiraj Singh | Bloomberg

New Delhi: Three things of significance have happened in India’s banking and finance sector.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced that 21 nationalised banks would merge to become 12, something of a rescue operation for Yes Bank was reportedly in the works, and a new study by Professor Amartya Lahiri of the University of British Columbia found that while deposits since demonetisation went up, lending by banks did not.

If banks are not able to lend, the banking business comes to a standstill. The big problem right now in the Indian banking system is that there is a loss of confidence on the part of both lender and borrower.

How government banks destroy value

Government banks are suffering more because they have the sword of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and other anti-corruption agencies hanging over their heads. This in turn makes them more diffident about lending, leading to value erosion and wealth destruction.

A good way to establish this is to look at market capitalisations of both private and government banks. India’s largest (and oldest) public sector bank, the State Bank of India (SBI), has a loan book value of Rs 23 lakh crore and a market cap of Rs 2.57 lakh crore.

HDFC Bank, by comparison, has a market cap of Rs 6.31 lakh crore. This number alone has the values of all the PSU banks put together, with Rs 2 lakh crore to spare.

Even though it is much younger than SBI, Kotak Mahindra Bank has a market cap of Rs 3.17 lakh crore. ICICI Bank, despite the crises it has faced, is capped at Rs 3.27 lakh crore.

This is the kind of value loss that governments have caused in their own banks.


Also read: India’s first credit card IPO set for success despite market turmoil caused by coronavirus


The big bank merger

Vijaya Bank and Dena Bank had earlier been merged with the Bank of Baroda, which are together valued at Rs 37,000 crore.

Now, United Bank of India and Oriental Bank of Commerce will be merged with Punjab National Bank, Syndicate Bank will be merged with Canara Bank, Allahabad Bank will be amalgamated with Indian Bank, and Andhra Bank and Corporation Bank will be consolidated with Union Bank of India.

Graphic: Soham Sen/ThePrint

Mergers will work if costs are cut down. Even better would be freeing them from government regulations and controls on lending. As long as they fear regulation, they will not lend.

The case for governments to get out of banking

Bandhan Bank, which got a licence only three to four years back, has already grown to a market cap of Rs 68,353 crore. The value of this bank is more than all the banks that are being merged on 1 April, barring Punjab National Bank.

Axis Bank, which was in a crisis till a few years ago, has come back with a market cap of Rs 1.39 lakh crore — more than all the public banks combined, including PNB but excluding SBI.

AU Small Finance Bank, which was set up in 2017, is valued at Rs 35,715 crore — this is more than Bank of Baroda even after its merger.

This only illustrates further how governments should eject themselves from this business. Twelve badly run banks are no better than 21 badly run banks. The government must free them up.

Amartya Lahiri’s study shows that as of September 2019, deposits have grown to Rs 140 lakh crore, while credit is only about Rs 95 lakh crore — this means Rs 46 lakh crore is somewhere in the banking system. What banks cannot lend profitably will need to be put in government bonds or the RBI, which is usually less than what banks are paying depositors. In this way, banks will continue to make losses.


Also read: Seizing Yes Bank could lead to a contagion, analysts say


The way out

The first thing that has to happen is an improvement in the business environment. For this, the government has to accept that it is a value destroyer, and should not be running these banks. It similarly needs to realise that it cannot run businesses, and that the promise of minimum government has to be kept in running business and industry.

It must give up the idea that public banks are more virtuous than private ones in terms of lending to the needy, because everyone is governed by the same regulations in terms of agricultural credit, etc.

Even when in trouble, private sector banks are not irretrievable.

What can the government do with PSU banks? It can make them autonomous and board-run. It should also remove the Comptroller and Auditor General, CBI and other agencies from their watch, and let perhaps one agency be an auditor. Unless there is theft, the lending process needn’t be criminalised.

Finally, unless the government brings down administered rates, it will be difficult to bring down interest rates.


Also read: To use cryptocurrency or not is no more a question in India. RBI must now fix payment market