Saturday, March 18, 2023
HomeOpinionHow China's project to de-Islamicise its Uyghur Muslims began and continues

How China’s project to de-Islamicise its Uyghur Muslims began and continues

In episode 577 of 'Cut the Clutter', ThePrint's Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta discusses the Uyghur issue and a new report that maps China's 'cultural erasure' of the region.

Text Size:

New Delhi: The Chinese government has destroyed tens of thousands of mosques and graveyards in the Xinjiang province, according to a new report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI). In episode 577 of ‘Cut the Clutter’, ThePrint’s Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta unpacks the what, where, who, when, why, and how of China’s project to de-Islamicise or Sinicise the Uyghur Muslims of Xinjiang.

The Uyghurs are a Turkic-speaking ethnic minority in China, which is otherwise dominated by the Han Chinese. Although constituting the majority population in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Province, the Chinese government refuses to consider them as the indigenous population.

“They regard them as a national minority, which means they work with the presumption that Uyghurs belong to all of China. So they can claim no special rights in the province,” said Shekhar Gupta.

Also read: US readies ‘harsh’ sanctions on China over abuses in Xinjiang

The what

The ASPI study, which was led by the think tank’s researcher Nathan Ruser, had mapped the “cultural erasure” of the region using satellite images.

“These are quite telling,” Gupta remarked on the images and added, “This looks like there is a deliberate and strong campaign to change the character of the place. So it loses somehow its distinct Islamic character.”

The satellite images accessed by ASPI also showed the razing of the famous Ordam Mazar, a settlement in the Great Bughra Desert, believed to be the site from where Islam spread across the region.

The other most noteworthy finding of the study is the proliferation of the internment or “re-education” camps.

“The Chinese have said that they have demolished most of their detention centres. On the other hand, 60 of the detention centres have been expanded since 2018. Fourteen new detention centres are being built,” he said.

The number of detainees in these centres is anywhere between eight to 20 lakhs. “This would put one in five Uyghurs inside a detention centre,” Gupta said.

The where

A landlocked region, Xinjiang is located in the north-west of China and covers a large area of 16 lakh square kilometres. Despite this, the province is thinly populated and characterised by a number of deserts including the Taklamakan and Dzoosotoyn Elisen deserts.

“So this is really in the middle of nowhere, very large, very few people, and has borders with eight countries,” Gupta noted. The eight countries include Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Afghanistan and Russia.

Pakistan and India also figure in this list albeit with a twist. Gupta elucidated that if the official Indian map is to be considered, which does not include Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK), Xinjiang doesn’t share a border with Pakistan. “That’s why this region is crucial. And that’s why the Kashmir issue becomes so crucial for China as well,” he said.

Also read: How China is defending its detention of Muslims to the world while selling the BRI dream

The why and who

Trouble in the region began as far back as the 10th century, when the Mongols conquered Xinjiang or Sinkiang, as it was earlier known. A Buddhist region under the Kingdom of Khotan, Xinjiang was then converted to Islam.

“And then Islam grew in this province, or this area became essentially Islamic … They (the Mongol rulers) kept fighting … with the Chinese rulers, that is Ming Dynasty, and then the Ching Dynasty. Later, between 1644 and 1941, Xinjiang was made a part of China,” Gupta said and added, “The Chinese, on the other hand, insist that Xinjiang has been a part of China since 200 BC.”

The Chinese communist party, since the time of leader Mao Zedong, have believed religion and ethnicity to be “terrible things”, said Gupta. It was with the Great Leap Forward, a so-called economic and social campaign led by China from 1958 and 1962, that the government began forcefully assimilating the Uyghurs.

Then in 1966 came the Cultural Revolution.

“These attacks again started, but significantly, Muslim mosques and places of worship were not desecrated. They were still standing,” he said.

The when

Gupta explained the events which led up to the de-Islamisation of the area. It all started in 1997 when riots started taking place in the region, which led to the killings of hundreds of people. “It was after that the Chinese Communist Party thought that this was an area of concern. And this is also when a proliferation of mosques took place,” he said.

The subsequent years have been marked by rising tension between the Chinese and Uyghur separatists, and terrorist attacks.

“There was also a failed plane hijacking incident. When that happened, then they (the Chinese government) widened this attack on Muslim minorities and linked it to George Bush’s Global War on Terror,” Gupta surmised.

Just like how the US is waging a war on terror in Pakistan, Afghanistan and other parts of the Middle East, China said it could do the same in Xinjiang as the Uyghur issue had been caused by the same influence, Gupta noted.

This, and most significantly Chinese President Xi Jinping’s leaked 2014 speech denouncing “religious extremism”, marked the beginning of the sinicisation of the Uyghurs.

Also read: Why Pakistan champions Islamic causes globally but ignores Uighur persecution by BFF China

The how

As a part of this process, mosques were taken over and turned into bars or shops, 30 Muslim names were banned and Uyghurs were placed in detention centres.

“People have been arrested and put in detention centres for all kinds of alleged crimes, including visiting ‘troublesome countries’ like Turkmenistan and Turkey,” Gupta said.

In the detention centres, which are akin to maximum-security prisons, the detainees are taught to “sing praises of Communism”. These facilities are strictly monitored by security cameras. “All the satellite data also tells you that since the 2017-18, when there were 39 cameras, the number has tripled now, so more and more people are being put into camps,” Gupta added.

ASPI report adds to US-China friction 

The ASPI report has become another thorn in US-China relations. The Communist government termed the report as “total nonsense” and motivated by the US government.

Gupta, however, refuted the claim of the ASPI data being fake, pointing to other reports, which highlighted the dismal situation of the Uyghurs.

He also remarked on the irony of the entire conflict. “I mean, you have a situation where millions of Muslims are being persecuted and systematically, de-Islamicised … But no Muslim nation is complaining. In fact, some of the largest Muslim nations are China’s closest friends,” he remarked.

“But America is complaining … It is Trump’s America, which is now pushing back strongly,” he said.

Watch the the full CTC episode here:

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. Professor Gupta, in the tone of your one-day journalism professor’s sermon on the subject of Uyghur’s in China, you unfortunately scored an “F” grade.
    The biggest fault of your sermon lies in citing from a dubious source: The ASPI study. Simply because a source is prefixed with “US,” or “Australia” does not grant it automatic credibility. That’s journalism 101 and I’m really sorry I have to remind you of this.
    If you had dug further, you would have found that one of the main sources of the ASPI study is Adrian Zenz, which The Grayzone has exposed to be a “far-right [Christian] fundamentalist German researcher cited on China, Xinjiang, and the Uyghurs” with fanatical religious motive.
    Sure, you tried to pass off by springing caveats about this and that throughout your sermon, and I honestly would have marked you a “D” grade (or even slightly higher) if you were to cite The Grayzone with your usual qualification. but alas you seemed not to have the journalistic courage to even mention this alternative source, perhaps it would blow too large a hole in the story you are trying to spin so you conveniently swept it under the carpet.
    I would not even bother to point our the far too many factual inaccuracies in your feeble attempt to pontificate on a subject that you obviously poorly grasp. It’s best that you go back to China 101 and Uyghur 101 in your own leisure.
    Moving away from your dismal “F” grade in this sermon to the larger political point you are trying to impress upon your audience, I won’t argue with your anti-everything Chinese sentiment as that’s your personal opinion, but I invite you to ponder about thesd:
    1. A far-right fanatical Christian on a crusade for the Moslem Uyghur, how believable is that?
    2. Do you seriously think the silence of the Arab nations and governments are due to folly or cold-heartedness toward their Moslem brethens? They might know better about the hidden agenda than you give them credits for!
    3. You also cited the pompous Mike Pompeo, so let me remind you that he’s a right-wing evangelical Baptist in the same boat or worse than Adrian Zenz. And if you think these right-wing Christian fanatics will play nice with Hindus, banish that naive thought because the Hindus are next-in-line in their target list.
    Let’s hope you fare better next time.
    p/s: I know you had your interns doing most of the research for you on this sermon but I pin the failure squarely on you as you are the boss and you should have the journalistic courage to rise above narrow-minded politics.

Comments are closed.