The headline for this week’s National Interest is inspired by Raj Kapoor’s Bobby (1973). Dimple Kapadia pleads with Rishi Kapoor in Lata Mangeshkar’s voice: “mujhe kuchh kehna hai” (I must tell you something). And Rishi Kapoor responds, in Shailendra Singh’s voice: “mujhe bhi kuchch kehna hai” (even I must tell you something). It tugs at your heart-strings as teenagers bare their love in Anand Bakshi’s subtle lyrics.
There is, however, nothing subtle about the phenomenon we are analysing, by twisting these famous lines, replacing “kehna” with “karna”. So, when faced with a serious crisis, even a grave national emergency like North India’s murderous air quality, our response usually is, echoing Dimple: “mujhe kuchh karna hai” (I must do something about this). The rest of us in the larger governance elite – judiciary, activists, media, and the smartest of all, the politicians – then become Rishi Kapoor’s: “mujhe bhi kuchh karna hai”.
Everybody then does her “something”, salves her conscience, the media conjures up glorious headlines, and talking heads declare victory. Google and check how many times, especially post Diwali and in the winter months, drastic, one-shot solutions have been announced and hailed as a brave death-blow to smog. There is no effort to research and address the larger problem. It takes too long, real solutions aren’t “sexy”. They require too much time, and onerous hard work. Yet, you can’t be seen to be doing nothing about this emergency. So let’s at least do “something”. No harm if it gives me an opportunity to ride my own pet hobby-horse, or slay my own favourite demon. Because when I have done my something, my responsibility is over. You can, meanwhile, buy that air-purifier (which costs more than an air-conditioner) and keep that steroid inhaler handy. And if you can’t afford these, gasp, and pray.
This is a quick recounting of some headline-grabbing things our champion smog-slayers have done in the last many years. Somebody has banned all vehicles beyond a certain age in the capital, another has cracked down on diesel, a pollution tax has been levied on heavy trucks entering the city, work-stoppage has been ordered at construction sites on a whim, water-spraying ordered, household summarily fined (Rs 50,000 no less) for leaving debris on the kerbside, an ‘odd-even’ scheme for cars has been implemented with endless fanfare on TV channels, sponsored by air-purifier brands, and now the sale of crackers has been banned. How much better is our air quality as a result? Check the readings on your air filter.
Also Read: How Delhi’s air crisis can be resolved by curbing paddy cultivation in Punjab, Haryana
There is no doubt that the activist-judiciary complex that rose in the mid-1990s, the years of Supreme Court’s Mr Justice “Environment” Kuldip Singh and PIL warrior M.C. Mehta, has made a real contribution. Its high point was the successful shifting of the capital’s public and commercial transport to CNG. It brought about a phenomenal improvement in air quality. But this benefit peaked a decade back.
Much that has followed since then is gimmicky, thoughtless, arrogant, dictatorial. Something on the lines of: we, the activists, judges, and friends in the media, know what is best for you. So we order, and you follow. On fear of contempt of court. Ask no questions, seek no accountability. Meanwhile, also learn to nebulise your children.
Delhi’s air is a desperate problem, but some of the solutions have been too desperate and unthinking. For example, the overnight shifting of all of Delhi’s cottage industry to outlying areas like Bawana, with no time, patience, or commitment to build infrastructure – physical or human. Industry and jobs were moved out before public transport and housing could fetch up, so the result was job losses, spawning of new slums, and illegal housing sprawls built by land-grab mafias and simply shifting the capital’s pollution from its relatively core areas to the outskirts. There was insufficient thought to the kind of industry Delhi should have, and on a policy to move in that direction.
Funny, the belief that one privileged community can load its pollution on a lesser one. That poison-laden air does not respect municipal or even national boundaries was a lesson we were taught by the father of modern environmental activism, Lester Brown, in his bible on the issue, World Without Borders, published in 1972.
In 2015, AAP, a party of former activists, took power in Delhi. It was quick to see the opportunity to shift from its old anti-corruption agenda to anti-pollution, and took gimmickry to another plane altogether. I have compiled the following facts with the help of my colleague Rajgopal Singh.
First, it announced the so-called ‘odd-even’ scheme, which made no difference to air quality. Then followed the promise of installation of five giant air purifiers, a mist fountain, and a virtual chimney in the most polluted areas. It was even done on “trial basis” in October 2016. There were other promises: mechanised, vacuum-sweeping of Delhi’s roads to reduce dust, our nastiest lung-destroyer. Spotted one of those lately?
The Environment Pollution Control Authority (EPCA), the Supreme Court, and the National Green Tribunal, meanwhile, kept doing their own thing, passing so many orders on vehicles and fuels that you’d need to call McKinsey to make sense of these. A reading of the comprehensive EPCA report submitted to the Supreme Court on 1 February this year is revealing, especially the section on status report on implementation of SC orders (page 14-20).
Also Read: This is how London tackled air pollution. Delhi can learn
Even more instructive is the report EPCA has submitted on 4 April this year, detailing the Supreme Court’s action plan on the capital’s smog (page 10-29). It is well-meaning, comprehensive, and would usher in the perfect world. But it is impossible to implement, short of a revolution. Or, let me push the envelope, even after a full revolution. It has steps that will be binding on at least two dozen agencies of the Centre and several states besides, indeed, Delhi. It will have implications on budgets (buy thousands more buses and create special corridors for them), fuels, taxes, agriculture in adjoining and distant states, Haryana and Punjab, municipal and civic operations.
If you read each point of this plan, and the agency tasked for compliance, you will see that the least it will take to implement is a full-time Supreme Court bench, or may be the entire Supreme Court sitting on a daily basis with a dozen empowered committees to oversee everything. With the greatest respect, we have to say that while this makes brilliantly reassuring reading, it’s not going to happen. A cruel fact-check: no new buses have been bought by Delhi after the surge during the Commonwealth Games in 2010, the ongoing Metro Phase-3 is the first to be delayed by more than a year, and even the plan for Phase-4 is delayed by a full 2.5 years. The whole mess is what we might call a dog’s breakfast, which even Gods can’t unscramble.
It’s harsh, but not speaking the truth would be cowardly and dishonest to our children’s lungs. These committees, created as a result of an M.C. Mehta PIL beginning 1985, have done a stellar job, but have now outlived their utility. Now they are bored, tired and repetitive like any other government bureaucracy with its sense of entitlement. In its 20th year now, the EPCA could be among our longest lasting Court-mandated authorities. Its chief, Bhure Lal (whose name recently surfaced as a Bofors investigator), took over the EPCA in 1998, and has carried on through the tenure of 17 chief justices of India. All that would have been fine if, meanwhile, our air quality had improved.
It’s time for the Centre to set up a new, empowered political authority, under the Prime Minister if necessary, including all concerned chief ministers, set targets for it, and be held accountable. It’s time also, I say with the greatest humility, for the courts to get off the kerb. They have done a lot, but why let the executive pass the buck to them, sit back, and mock the ineffectuality of their actions?
Also Read: TV channel melodrama has its uses this week. It’s about Delhi air pollution
One such foolish order was about the banning of more than 10 year old diesel vehicles in the NCR .
10 years is an arbitrary date. Either diesel is carcinogenic or it is not.
Secondly for this order to be effective it is essential that the MV ACT of all NCR states should be amended. As far as I actually ascertained even till end 2018 other than may be Delhi ,no other state had amended its Act to issue RC for 10 years. Despite the NGT and Supreme Court ruling the RC for a diesel vehicle was valid for 15 years and the State Governments were charging , at least Haryana was, one time charge for 15 years.
This only led to harrassment of owners of such vehicles.
I disagree with the tenor of the article in placing the blame for nothing good happening to air quality in Delhi at the doors of courts, activists and litigants. After all courts didn’t ask for some one to file a petition. Concerned citizen has no pleasure in pursuing a thankless litigation. But it is because those entrusted with doing what they should don’t do it that these have to intervene. Let us say (for a minute imagine) we are law abiding, rule of law prevails. Then if cracker sale is banned no one would sell and that much less cracker would go up in smoke and that much air quality would improve. But, no, we enjoy breaking the law at the first opportunity we get, rule of law ki eisi ki taisi. Now, suddenly the law becomes bad, law maker becomes bad. This is not done.
bhure lal as EPCA chief and sunita narain as DG is like combining Laattoo Shah (of the DDCA) and Justic Lodha —
oligarchic ; expensive; ineffectual.
I agree especially with the bit about “courts getting off the kerb”. Courts will do better with doing what they are mandated to do by the constitution. One word of advice for activists too. Instead of rushing to court with their frivolous PIL they would better approach governments or sit on Dharanas. These elites with deep pockets to pay for hiring senior advocates in SC must realise that for every frivolous PIL they file they delay the justice for some innocent rotting in jails or some victims waiting for justice years on.
Instead of doing all these, why not give a thought to shift national capital to other place along with supreme court premises. This will solve the problem to maximum extent and i think it will be cost effective also.
I think its worth giving a thought!
Karna toh hum sab ko padega, aur bahut kuchh, bina vilamb. A full blown health crisis is upon us, most visibly in Delhi. India is losing 2.5 million citizens prematurely each year to pollution. Many more must be suffering, losing economic output and quality of life. 2. Not a job for the judiciary, although some of its interventions have been very useful. It is for the executive, working with the legislature, to assess what the environmental consequences of $ 6 trillion in GDP will be, how we can get there without our lungs seizing up. Citizens will have to modify lifestyles, out of conviction and responsibility rather than just executive or judicial fiat. 3. A permanent, nationwide ban on fircrackers would have great symbolic value, like Mahatma Gandhi picking up a lump of salt.