scorecardresearch
Friday, April 19, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeIndiaGovernancePoll panel to study NITI Aayog vice-chair's Congress jibe, see if it...

Poll panel to study NITI Aayog vice-chair’s Congress jibe, see if it violated model code

After Congress promised a minimum income guarantee of Rs 72,000/year to India's poorest, NITI Aayog vice-chairman Rajiv Kumar accused the party of “saying & doing anything to win elections”.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The Election Commission has sought the transcript of a controversial statement made by NITI Aayog vice-chairman Rajiv Kumar against the Congress, to examine whether it violated the model code of conduct, ThePrint has learnt.

After Congress president Rahul Gandhi promised a minimum income guarantee of Rs 72,000/year to the poorest Indian families if the party was voted to office, Kumar accused the party of “saying and doing anything to win elections”.

In an interview to news agency ANI Monday, Kumar said, “It’s an old pattern followed by Congress. They say and do anything to win elections. Poverty was removed in 1966, One Rank One Pension was later implemented, everyone received proper education under Right of Education! So you see then can say & do anything [sic].”

According to sources in the Election Commission, the poll panel took suo motu cognisance of the statement, and sought the exact transcript to ascertain if the statement violated the model code of conduct.

The notice came after several Twitter users questioned whether Kumar, a high-ranking government official, could make such a politically-loaded statement. especially when the code was in force.

Apart from his interview to ANI, Kumar had also put out a series of tweets, lambasting the Congress for announcing a scheme that would “bust fiscal discipline, create strong disincentives against work and which will never be implemented”.

Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala Tuesday criticised the NITI Aayog, the government think tank formed under the Narendra Modi administration after the dissolution of the Planning Commission, saying it had become a “Rajneeti Aayog (political commission)”.


Also read: Now, Niti Aayog to ensure credibility of India’s economic data


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

3 COMMENTS

  1. May be Neeti Aayog wrong to comment, but the truth can’t be denied that a irresponsible commitment to lure the voters without assessing the quantum of the funds such promised is commendable. It will make our Indians idle and unproductive . More over if Rs.400/- is the minimum wage, how can anyone prove getting lesser than it. So stop befooling people. Let India work and justify the people to prove to be worth earning Rs.12000/-.

  2. Narendra Modi’s prime task has been to weaken the national institutions, politicise them, fill up key posts, including even that of the nation’s President, with RSS stalwarts, and to weaken the judiciary. Remember the unprecedented, historic press conference by four senior Supreme Court judges to express their lack of confidence in their chief, that too in the context of a fake encounter killing case in which the ruling party chief, Amit Shah was the prime accused.

  3. Violation of the Model Code of Conduct is a lesser issue. What is more important is to question whether someone in this position can be so blatantly political / partisan. It is evident that a government servant deputed to Niti Aayog cannot. Those who are political appointees have a little more latitude / autonomy perhaps, but they serve a federal institution that deals extensively with the states, many ruled by opposition parties. It is just a matter of time before service chiefs start criticising previous governments, their failure to procure weapons systems in time, perhaps to respond more forcefully to provocations. This is the new normal.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular