Zafar Sareshwala who is considered close to Modi | @zafarsareshwala/twitter
Zafar Sareshwala who is considered close to Modi | @zafarsareshwala/twitter
Text Size:

Lt Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah said there was a day’s delay in deploying the Army in Gujarat in 2002. Zafar Sareshwala asks why he kept mum so far.

New Delhi: Days after retired Army officer and academician Lt General Zameer Uddin Shah said there was a delay in deploying the Army during the 2002 Gujarat riots, Zafar Sareshwala, a prominent Muslim businessman from Gujarat believed to be close to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has questioned his 16-year silence.

“If you knew something so damning and so malicious, why did you keep silent for 17 years (sic)?” Sareshwala asked. “And why are you speaking about it now – just six months before the election?”

In a recent Walk the Talk interview with ThePrint’s editor-in-chief Shekhar Gupta, Shah said the Modi-led Gujarat government at the time had delayed the deployment of the Army by one day, which caused an extra day of rioting.

Shah, whose recent book The Sarkari Mussalman has stirred up a controversy over sections relating to the riots, was leading the Army in quelling the riots in the state.


Also read: India’s young Muslims are taking the IAS, IPS route to get a share of power


“This is exactly what a ‘Sarkari Mussalman’ does — when in position of power, he remains quiet just to establish his secular credentials,” said Sareshwala, clarifying that he had the “highest respect” for Shah as an Army officer and academician.

“I have met him on three occasions myself, and Gujarat would invariably come up in our discussion. But he never ever uttered a word about the delay.”

Lost opportunities to speak up

In the aftermath of the riots, three commissions were set up to probe the carnage — the U.C. Banerjee Commission, the Nanawati-Mehta Commission, and the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT).

Sareshwala, a former vice-chancellor of Hyderabad’s Maulana Azad National Urdu University, said Shah could’ve spoken up on any of these three occasions.

“Why did he not say anything when these reports were being made? What is the point of speaking now?” he asked. “He can’t say ‘I was not called by these commissions’… If a horrible crime is committed and you are witness to it, will you wait for the court to call you or will you go and depose as a witness yourself?”

Sareshwala added that in 2015, he himself had set up a meeting between Prime Minister Modi and Shah — who was then vice-chancellor of the Aligarh Muslim University — to discuss the issue of the university’s minority character.

“At that time, he met the PM and praised him immensely. Even then he didn’t bring this up. So why now, at a time when he has written a book?” Sareshwala asked.

‘Gujarat’s Muslims have moved on’

Sareshwala said as a victim of the riots himself, he didn’t “want this issue to be raked up now…If you said it when it would have made a difference, I would have appreciated it, but not now”.


Also read: ‘We don’t even think of riots’: For many first-time voters in Gujarat, 2002 is irrelevant


He also asked why Shah has never come forward to help the Muslims of Gujarat by mentoring young Muslims to join the Army, or set up schools or coaching centres.

“If you rake up 2002 in 2018, it will only cause damage to the Gujarati Muslim, who has moved on now.”

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

8 Comments Share Your Views

8 COMMENTS

  1. Afsos. Zameer Ahmad ke Zameer ko Islami rang lag gata isne to wardi ki bhi laaj nahi rakhi ye bhoolgaya ke Hindustan ne hi isse General banaya muslim deshun mein Hindu ki kya halat hai bhhol hi Gaya Kya Kya abh bhi Hinduon ko musalmano pe bharose karna chahiye_Hinduo sab bar socho—-kabhi nahi guru Nanak ji ka updesh yaadkaro

    • KP ji itna mat boliye. Mujhe nahin maloom aap kis umar ke hain, lekin agar aap 1965 mein iss desh mein thay toh aapko ABDUL HAMID ka naam yaad hoga. 1965 mein Pakistan se war hua thaa, itna toh aapko maloom hoga. Uss war mein Abdul Hamid ka kya role thaa zara kisi-se pata keejiye.

  2. The matter is too serious to be left at comments . It appears to implead a person no less than the Honourable PM.Isn’t an impartial enquiry called for ?The fact of the matter is far more important than the person of the retired General or the issue of delay.

  3. To sell books one needs to add masala else no one will buy them. The same reason why romance stories of lead actors get buzzing before a movies release.

    • The General is one of the finest of the finest! There was a delay and we all know why! He has simply stated it and not in relation to any election! Nikhil you would do by not passing such ill-informed and opinionated judgement on an accomplished professional patriot!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here