scorecardresearch
Add as a preferred source on Google
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

Support our Journalism

9th Anniversary: Free Tote & Mug

Subscribe
HomeFeaturesHow 10 Downing Street made it to Booking.com as a holiday stay....

How 10 Downing Street made it to Booking.com as a holiday stay. Highlight: Larry the cat

A fake listing for the British PM’s residence stayed on Booking.com for two months and even got reservation requests, says a report by Which?, a UK consumer group.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: For about two months, one of London’s most famous addresses was listed on Booking.com as a holiday stay: 10 Downing Street, the official residence of the British Prime Minister. There was even a glowing review that mentioned Larry, the cat who lives there.

It was all part of an elaborate ruse by a UK consumer group, Which?, to expose loopholes in Booking.com’s checks against fake listings. The platform failed utterly, according to the consumer group.

In a 2 September report titled ‘How we listed 10 Downing Street as a holiday home on Booking.com’, Which? described how it created the fake property listing and how easy getting it live turned out to be.  Enquiries immediately came from customers who seemed to have taken the listing seriously.

“We thought listing the Prime Minister’s residence as a holiday let was so absurd and obviously a scam that Booking.com would stop it. It didn’t. Instead, the listing went live and we were able to take bookings in just a few hours,” the report noted.

 

The failure could be “comical”, it added, were it not for the many people reporting being scammed on Booking.com.

In a post on X, Which? also called on the UK telecommunications regulator Ofcom to “crack down on platforms leaving their customers vulnerable to scams”.


Also Read: Porn apps advertised on FB, Insta being used as bait to empty bank accounts, hijack phones, govt warns


 

A glowing ‘review’

 The listing for 10 Downing Street promised a “1 bedroom apartment in the heart of London”, just a four-minute walk from the Houses of Parliament. The report said 14 people asked about its availability in the first 20 minutes.

 Which? later posted a fake review of the stay, giving it a 10 out of 10 rating. The review said it was “unbelievable” that Booking.com had allowed a stay at the Prime Minister’s residence. It described “hanging out with Larry the Cat” as a highlight.

The report said Which? had been warning about scams on Booking.com for two years. In October 2024, it created a fake listing in about 15 minutes without undergoing any identity verification. After this, Booking.com tightened its checks, partly in response to new UK rules requiring accommodation platforms to verify listings, but the 10 Downing Street experiment showed those safeguards could still be easily bypassed.

 Even after Which? notified Booking.com that the property was fake, the listing was not removed until 27 August, about two months after it was created.


Also Read: Are AI agents going rogue? Anthropic study of simulations shows sabotage, concealment of fraud


 

What Booking.com has said

Booking.com has denied that the 10 Downing Street experiment signals wider problems on its platform.

“This limited test is not a true reflection of the experience of millions of listings or reviews published on our platform,” the BBC quoted a spokesperson as saying.

The company said the property was not live and bookable for the entire two-month period. Because the listing had been closed, it said, some of its automatic fraud controls were not triggered to remove it completely.

Booking.com also said it uses “a range of checks and verification measures”, along with AI, to detect fraudulent listings. It said these measures help it remove most such listings within 24 hours. It added that fraud was becoming increasingly sophisticated and that it was continuing to strengthen its defences.

(Edited by Asavari Singh)

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Nine Years, Made Possible by Readers

In 2017, Shekhar Gupta started ThePrint with a simple belief: Indian readers want journalism that asks why and what next, not just what. And that enough of them would be willing to pay for good journalism.

Nine years on, that belief has held.

And, in these nine years, we’ve stayed true to our mission. We’ve been asking the follow-up questions, going beyond the headlines and explaining what’s actually happening. We’ve travelled across the country to bring you in-depth, visually-compelling stories from the ground.

It’s been nine years of readers choosing to make this possible. If you’d like to be one of them:

Support ThePrint

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular