scorecardresearch
Wednesday, June 26, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeEntertainmentLive Nation ticket buyers sue in wake of US Justice Department case

Live Nation ticket buyers sue in wake of US Justice Department case

Follow Us :
Text Size:

By Mike Scarcella
(Reuters) – Live Nation and its Ticketmaster unit have been hit with the first in a likely wave of new consumer antitrust lawsuits after the U.S. government and states sued to break up the two companies on Thursday.

The first consumer class-action lawsuit to piggyback on the government cases was filed later on Thursday in Manhattan federal court, seeking $5 billion in damages on behalf of potentially millions of ticket purchasers.

The cases accuse Live Nation of exerting monopoly control over the live events industry, threatening venues that work with rivals and boxing out competitors.

Consumer cases related to U.S. or state attorneys general lawsuits can pile up quickly and put added legal pressure on companies.

Lawyers for the class action plaintiffs at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd and Israel David did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Live Nation on Thursday called the government lawsuit “baseless” and said there was “more competition than ever” in the live events market.

Lawyers who reviewed the government complaint said Live Nation could base its defense partly on the Justice Department’s decision to sign off on Live Nation’s Ticketmaster acquisition more than a decade ago.

Crowell & Moring’s Eric Enson, an antitrust lawyer who is not involved in the lawsuit, said the government’s case raised thorny “legal and factual questions about whether a breakup is a legally permissible remedy.”

The case might resonate with consumers who have long complained about ticket prices, he said, “but proving antitrust cases to juries can be difficult.”

However, antitrust legal scholar Rebecca Allensworth of Vanderbilt University said while the public’s opinion of Live Nation is legally unimportant, “appearances matter in cases, maybe especially when they are decided by juries.”

The Justice Department said the prior case involved a different antitrust law and that Live Nation had since shown “more expansive forms” of anticompetitive conduct.

(Reporting by Mike Scarcella; Editing by David Bario and Nick Zieminski)

Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibilty for its content.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

  • Tags

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular